Advertisement

Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 179–210 | Cite as

Model-based nonlinear control of hydraulic servo systems: Challenges, developments and perspectives

  • Jianyong Yao
Review Article
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

Hydraulic servo system plays a significant role in industries, and usually acts as a core point in control and power transmission. Although linear theory-based control methods have been well established, advanced controller design methods for hydraulic servo system to achieve high performance is still an unending pursuit along with the development of modern industry. Essential nonlinearity is a unique feature and makes model-based nonlinear control more attractive, due to benefit from prior knowledge of the servo valve controlled hydraulic system. In this paper, a discussion for challenges in model-based nonlinear control, latest developments and brief perspectives of hydraulic servo systems are presented: Modelling uncertainty in hydraulic system is a major challenge, which includes parametric uncertainty and time-varying disturbance; some specific requirements also arise ad hoc difficulties such as nonlinear friction during low velocity tracking, severe disturbance, periodic disturbance, etc.; to handle various challenges, nonlinear solutions including parameter adaptation, nonlinear robust control, state and disturbance observation, backstepping design and so on, are proposed and integrated, theoretical analysis and lots of applications reveal their powerful capability to solve pertinent problems; and at the end, some perspectives and associated research topics (measurement noise, constraints, inner valve dynamics, input nonlinearity, etc.) in nonlinear hydraulic servo control are briefly explored and discussed.

Keywords

hydraulic servo system adaptive control robust control nonlinear friction disturbance compensation repetitive control noise alleviation constraint control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51675279), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (Grant Nos. 2014M551593 and 2015T80553), and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province in China (Grant No. BK20141402). The author also wants to express his appreciation to Prof. B. Yao for hosting his visit at Purdue University from October 2010 to October 2011, and the guidance in adaptive and robust design.

References

  1. 1.
    Merritt H E. Hydraulic Control Systems. New York: Wiley, 1967Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yao B, Bu F, Reedy J, et al. Adaptive robust motion control of single-rod hydraulic actuators: Theory and experiments. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2000, 5(1): 79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krstic M, Kanellakopoulos I, Kokotovic P V. Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design. New York: Wiley, 1995zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armstrong-Hélouvry B, Dupont P, Canudas de Wit C. A survey of models, analysis tools and compensation methods for the control of machines with friction. Automatica, 1994, 30(7): 1083–1138CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Canudas de Wit C, Olsson H, Astrom K J, et al. A new model for control of systems with friction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1995, 40(3): 419–425MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Swevers J, Al-Bender F, Ganseman C G, et al. An integrated friction model structure with improved presliding behavior for accurate friction compensation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2000, 45(4): 675–686MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yao J, Jiao Z, Ma D, et al. High-accuracy tracking control of hydraulic rotary actuators with modelling uncertainties. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2014, 19(2): 633–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yao J, Deng W, Jiao Z. RISE-based adaptive control of hydraulic systems with asymptotic tracking. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2017, 14(3): 1524–1531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lischinsky P, Canudas de Wit C, Morel G. Friction compensation for an industrial hydraulic robot. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 1999, 19 (1): 25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Swaroop D, Hedrick J K, Yip P P, et al. Dynamic surface control for a class of nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2000, 45(10): 1893–1899MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yip P P, Hedrick J K. Adaptive dynamic surface control: A simplified algorithm for adaptive backstepping control of nonlinear systems. International Journal of Control, 1998, 71(5): 959–979MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farrell J A, Polycarpou M, Sharma M, et al. Command filtered backstepping. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2009, 54 (6): 1391–1395MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dong W, Farrell J A, Polycarpou M M, et al. Command filtered adaptive backstepping. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2012, 20(3): 566–580CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guan C, Pan S. Adaptive sliding mode control of electro-hydraulic system with nonlinear unknown parameters. Control Engineering Practice, 2008, 16(11): 1275–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guan C, Pan S. Nonlinear adaptive robust control of single-rod electro-hydraulic actuator with unknown nonlinear parameters. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2008, 16(3): 434–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mintsa H A, Venugopal R, Kenne J P, et al. Feedback linearizationbased position control of an electrohydraulic servo system with supply pressure uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2012, 20(4): 1092–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yao J, Yang G, Jiao Z. High dynamic feedback linearization control of hydraulic actuators with backstepping. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 2015, 229: 728–737Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yao J, Jiao Z, Yao B, et al. Nonlinear adaptive robust force control of hydraulic load simulator. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2012, 25 (5): 766–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang G, Yao J, Le G, et al. Adaptive integral robust control of hydraulic systems with asymptotic tracking. Mechatronics, 2016, 40: 78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Deng W, Yao J. Adaptive integral robust control and application to electromechanical servo systems. ISA Transactions, 2017, 67: 256–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yang G, Yao J, Le G, et al. Asymptotic output tracking control of electro-hydraulic systems with unmatched disturbances. IET Control Theory & Applications, 2016, 10(18): 2543–2551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yao B, Xu L. On the design of adaptive robust repetitive controllers. In Proceedings of 2001 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2001, 1–9Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yao J, Jiao Z, Ma D. A practical nonlinear adaptive control of hydraulic servomechanisms with periodic-like disturbances. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2015, 20(6): 2752–2760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yao J, Deng W, Jiao Z. Adaptive control of hydraulic actuators with LuGre model based friction compensation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2015, 62(10): 6469–6477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xu L, Yao B. Adaptive robust control of mechanical systems with nonlinear dynamic friction compensation. International Journal of Control, 2008, 81(2): 167–176MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tan Y, Kanellakopoulos I. Adaptive nonlinear friction compensation with parametric uncertainties. In Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference. San Diego: IEEE, 1999, 2511–2515Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zheng Q, Gao L, Gao Z. On stability analysis of active disturbance rejection control for nonlinear time-varying plants with unknown dynamics. In Proceedings of 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. New Orleans: IEEE, 2007, 3501–3506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yao J, Jiao Z, Ma D. Extended-state-observer-based output feedback nonlinear robust control of hydraulic systems with backstepping. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2014, 61(11): 6285–6293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tee K P, Ge S S, Tay E H. Barrier Lyapunov function for the control of output-constrained nonlinear systems. Automatica, 2009, 45(4): 918–927MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ngo K B, Mahony R, Jiang Z P. Integrator backstepping using barrier functions for systems with multiple state constraints. In Proceedings of 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and 2005 European Control Conference. Seville: IEEE, 2005, 8306–8312Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Deng W, Yao J, Jiao Z. Adaptive backstepping motion control of hydraulic actuators with velocity and acceleration constraints. In Proceedings of 2014 IEEE Chinese Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference (CGNCC). Yantai: IEEE, 2014, 219–224Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sadegh N, Horowitz R. Stability and robustness analysis of a class of adaptive controllers for robot manipulators. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1990, 9(3): 74–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations