Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 423–432 | Cite as

Assembly design system based on engineering connection

  • Wensheng Yin
Research Article


An assembly design system is an important part of computer-aided design systems, which are important tools for realizing product concept design. The traditional assembly design system does not record the connection information of production on the engineering layer; consequently, the upstream design idea cannot be fully used in the downstream design. An assembly design model based on the relationship of engineering connection is presented. In this model, all nodes are divided into two categories: The component and the connection. Moreover, the product is constructed on the basis of the connection relationship of the components. The model is an And/Or graph and has the ability to record all assembly schemes. This model records only the connection information that has engineering application value in the product design. In addition, this model can significantly reduce the number of combinations, and is very favorable for the assembly sequence planning in the downstream. The system contains a connection knowledge system that can be mapped to the connection node, and the connection knowledge obtained in practice can be returned to the knowledge system. Finally, VC++ 6.0 is used to develop a prototype system called Connect-based Assembly Planning (CAP). The relationship between the CAP system and the commercial assembly design system is also established.


product design assembly design engineering connection assembly sequence planning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bourjault A. Contribution to a methodological approach of automated assembly: Automatic generation of assembly sequence. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Besancon: University of Franche-comte, 1984 (in French)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delchambre A. Computer-aided Assembly Planning. London: Chapman & Hall, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Mello L, Sanderson A. A correct and complete algorithm for the generation of mechanical assembly sequences. In: Proceedings of 1989 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Scottsdale: IEEE, 1989, 7(2): 228–240Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee S. Subassembly identification and evaluation for assembly planning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1994, 24(3): 493–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Su Q. A hierarchical approach on assembly sequence planning and optimal sequences analyzing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2009, 25(1): 224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang Y, Liu J. Assembly unit partitioning for collaborative assembly planning. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 45 (10): 172–179 (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dini G, Santochi M. Automated sequencing and subassembly detection in assembly planning. CIRP-Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 1992, 41(1): 1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang Y, Huang C. Disassembly matrix for disassembly processes of products. International Journal of Production Research, 2002, 40 (2): 255–273CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang Y, Lee C S G. A framework of knowledge-based assembly planning. In: Proceedings of 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Sacramento, 1991, 599–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eng T H, Ling Z K, Olson W, et al. Feature-based assembly modeling and sequence generation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1999, 36(1): 17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang G, Li H, Deng K. Research on planning of assembly model and assembly sequence based on characteristics. Journal of Machine Design, 2010, 27(1): 18–21 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomas J P. A Petri net framework for representing mechanical assembly sequences. In: Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Raleigh, 1992, 2116–2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zha X F, Lim S Y E, Fok S C. Integrate knowledge-based assembly sequence planning. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1998, 14(1): 50–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gui J K, Mäntylä M. Functional understanding of assembly modeling. Computer-Aided Design, 1994, 26(6): 435–451CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yin Z, Ding H, Li H, et al. A connector-based hierarchical approach to assembly sequence planning for mechanical assemblies. Computer-Aided Design, 2003, 35(1): 37–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang G, Yin G, Deng K, et al. Study on assembly sequence planning based on knowledge. Mechanical Science and Technology, 2006, 25(3): 273–276 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dong T, Tong R, Zhang L, et al. Assembly sequence planning using directed-connector knowledge. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 2004, 16(1): 128–133 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li R, Fu Y, Feng H. Assembly sequence planning based on connecter-structure knowledge. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2008, 14(6): 1130–1135 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yin W. Problem oriented analysis and decision expert system. Application Research of Computers, 2008, 25(12): 3645–3649, 3653 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yin W. Standard model of knowledge representation. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical Science and EngineeringHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations