Advertisement

Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 126–137 | Cite as

An identification method for enclosed voids restriction in manufacturability design for additive manufacturing structures

  • Shutian LiuEmail author
  • Quhao Li
  • Wenjiong Chen
  • Liyong Tong
  • Gengdong Cheng
Research Article

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, such as selective laser sintering (SLS) and fused deposition modeling (FDM), have become the powerful tools for direct manufacturing of complex parts. This breakthrough in manufacturing technology makes the fabrication of new geometrical features and multiple materials possible. Past researches on designs and design methods often focused on how to obtain desired functional performance of the structures or parts, specific manufacturing capabilities as well as manufacturing constraints of AM were neglected. However, the inherent constraints in AM processes should be taken into account in design process. In this paper, the enclosed voids, one type of manufacturing constraints of AM, are investigated. In mathematics, enclosed voids restriction expressed as the solid structure is simplyconnected. We propose an equivalent description of simply-connected constraint for avoiding enclosed voids in structures, named as virtual temperature method (VTM). In this method, suppose that the voids in structure are filled with a virtual heating material with high heat conductivity and solid areas are filled with another virtual material with low heat conductivity. Once the enclosed voids exist in structure, the maximum temperature value of structure will be very high. Based upon this method, the simplyconnected constraint is equivalent to maximum temperature constraint. And this method can be easily used to formulate the simply-connected constraint in topology optimization. The effectiveness of this description method is illustrated by several examples. Based upon topology optimization, an example of 3D cantilever beam is used to illustrate the trade-off between manufacturability and functionality. Moreover, the three optimized structures are fabricated by FDM technology to indicate further the necessity of considering the simply-connected constraint in design phase for AM.

Keywords

additive manufacturing topology optimization manufacturability constraints design for additive manufacturing simply-connected constraint 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kruth J P, Leu M C, Nakagawa T. Progress in additive manufacturing and rapid prototyping. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 1998, 47(2): 525–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gibson I, Rosen D W, Stucker B. Additive Manufacturing Technologies. New York: Springer, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murr L E, Gaytan S M, Ramirez D A, et al. Metal fabrication by additive manufacturing using laser and electron beam melting technologies. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2012, 28(1): 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gu D, Meiners W, Wissenbach K, et al. Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: Materials, processes and mechanisms. International Materials Reviews, 2012, 57(3): 133–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Turner B N, Strong R, Gold S A. A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2014, 20: 192–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim D S, Bae S W, Choi K H. Development of industrial SFF system using dual laser and optimal process. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2007, 23(6): 659–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kruth J, Vandenbroucke B, van Vaerenbergh J, et al. Digital manufacturing of biocompatible metal frameworks for complex dental prostheses by means of SLS/SLM. In: Proceedings of Virtual Prototyping and Rapid Manufacturing-Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping, Taylor & Francis. London, 2005, 139–146Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosen D. Design for additive manufacturing: Past, present, and future directions. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2014, 136(9): 090301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sigmund O, Maute K. Topology optimization approaches. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2013, 48(6): 1031–1055MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cheng K T, Olhoff N. An investigation concerning optimal design of solid elastic plates. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1981, 17(3): 305–323MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bendsøe M P, Kikuchi N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1988, 71(2): 197–224MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou M, Rozvany G. The COC algorithm, Part II: Topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1991, 89(1–3): 309–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bendsøe M P, Sigmund O. Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 1999, 69(9–10): 635–654Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader A M. A level-set method for shape optimization. Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 2002, 334(12): 1125–1130MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang M Y, Wang X, Guo D. A level set method for structural topology optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 192(1–2): 227–246MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xie Y, Steven G P. A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Computers & Structures, 1993, 49(5): 885–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sokolowski J, Zochowski A. Topological derivative in shape optimization. In: Floudas C A, Pardalos P M, eds. Encyclopedia of Optimization. New York: Springer, 2009, 3908–3918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Haftka R T. Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: Survey of recent developments. Structural Optimization, 1997, 14(1): 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bendsoe M P, Sigmund O. Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang Y, Liu S. Design of conducting paths based on topology optimization. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2008, 44(10): 1217–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhu J, Zhang W, Beckers P. Integrated layout design of multicomponent system. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2009, 78(6): 631–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sigmund O. Tailoring materials with prescribed elastic properties. Mechanics of Materials, 1995, 20(4): 351–368MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nomura T, Nishiwaki S, Sato K, et al. Topology optimization for the design of periodic microstructures composed of electromagnetic materials. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2009, 45(3): 210–226MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Radman A, Huang X, Xie Y. Topological optimization for the design of microstructures of isotropic cellular materials. Engineering Optimization, 2013, 45(11): 1331–1348MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Larsen U D, Sigmund O, Bouwstra S. Design and fabrication of compliant micromechanisms and structures with negative Poisson’s ratio. In: Proceedings of Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, the Ninth Annual International Workshop on an Investigation of Micro Structures, Sensors, Actuators, Machines and Systems. San Diego: IEEE, 1996, 365–371Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen W, Liu S. Topology optimization of microstructures of viscoelastic damping materials for a prescribed shear modulus. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2014, 50(2): 287–296MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Andreassen E, Lazarov B S, Sigmund O. Design of manufacturable 3D extremal elastic microstructure. Mechanics of Materials, 2014, 69(1): 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brackett D, Ashcroft I, Hague R. A dithering based method to generate variable volume lattice cells for additive manufacturing. In: 22nd Annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium. 2011, 671–679Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aremu A, Ashcroft I, Hague R, et al. Suitability of SIMP and BESO topology optimization algorithms for additive manufacture. In: 21st Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium (SFF)—An Additive Manufacturing Conference. 2010, 679–692Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gaynor A T, Meisel N A, Williams C B, et al. Multiple material topology optimization of compliant mechanisms created via polyJet 3D printing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2014, 136(6): 061015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hu Y, Blouin V Y, Fadel G M. Design for manufacturing of 3D heterogeneous objects with processing time consideration. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2008, 130(3): 031701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tomlin M, Meyer J. Topology optimization of an additive layer manufactured (ALM) aerospace part. In: Proceedings of 7th Altair CAE Technology Conference. 2011Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vayre B, Vignat F, Villeneuve F. Designing for additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 2012, 3: 632–637Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Diegel O, Singamneni S, Reay S, et al. Tools for sustainable product design: Additive manufacturing. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2010, 3(3): 68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kruth J P, Mercelis P, van Vaerenbergh J, et al. Binding mechanisms in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2005, 11(1): 26–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zein I, Hutmacher D W, Tan K C, et al. Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials, 2002, 23(4): 1169–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hutmacher D W, Schantz T, Zein I, et al. Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2001, 55(2): 203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Myers S B. Connections between differential geometry and topology. I. Simply connected surfaces. Duke Mathematical Journal, 1935, 1(3): 376–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bondy J A, Murty U S R. Graph Theory with Applications. London: Macmillan, 1976Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Golumbic MC. Algorithmic Graph Theory and Perfect Graphs. 2nd. North Holland, 2004Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    West D B. Introduction to Graph Theory. Upper Saddle River: Prentice hall, 2001Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Korf R E. Depth-first iterative-deepening: An optimal admissible tree search. Artificial Intelligence, 1985, 27(1): 97–109MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhou R, Hansen E A. Breadth-first heuristic search. Artificial Intelligence, 2006, 170(4–5): 385–408MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bader D A, Madduri K. Designing multithreaded algorithms for breadth-first search and st-connectivity on the Cray MTA-2. In: International Conference on Parallel Processing. Columbus: IEEE, 2006, 523–530Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gabow H N, Tarjan R E. A linear-time algorithm for a special case of disjoint set union. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. Baltimore: ACM, 1983, 246–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tarjan R E. Efficiency of a good but not linear set union algorithm. Journal of the ACM, 1975, 22(2): 215–225MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dhatt G, Lefrançois E, Touzot G. Finite Element Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bathe K J. Finite element method. In: Wah B W, ed. Wiley encyclopedia of computer science and engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2008, 1–12Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Raithby G, Chui E. A finite-volume method for predicting a radiant heat transfer in enclosures with participating media. Journal of Heat Transfer, 1990, 112(2): 415–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Liszka T, Orkisz J. The finite difference method at arbitrary irregular grids and its application in applied mechanics. Computers & Structures, 1980, 11(1–2): 83–95MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shutian Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Quhao Li
    • 1
  • Wenjiong Chen
    • 1
  • Liyong Tong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gengdong Cheng
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial EquipmentDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina
  2. 2.School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic EngineeringUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations