Skip to main content
Log in

Necessity for Legislation on China’s Recycling Economy and Regulatory Framework Analysis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Law in China

Abstract

In China, the necessity for legislation on recycling economy (RE) first lies in the difference in the conceptions applied to define it. Three schools in theory are prevailing at present: affirmative, negative, and replaceable. The paper insists that RE is of unique implication for China. A practical need for legislation exists; however, those rational parts in both negative and replaceable schools should be given full consideration. The necessity for RE legislation rests not only upon requirements for social and economic development but also upon economic globalization and the internalization of environmental protection. China’s RE legislation should learn from foreign countries, meet actual needs of the country, make sure to coordinate with clean production law, and make recommendations and options for legislative modes, principles, and systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is on the basis of Zhou Ke, Cao Jianqun, ”Necessity for Legislation on China’s Recycling Economy and Regulatory Framework Analysis”, Xinhua Digest (half monthly), Vol. 11, 2005(in Chinese)

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, K., Cao, X. & Chi, Gq. Necessity for Legislation on China’s Recycling Economy and Regulatory Framework Analysis. Front. Law China 1, 100–111 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-005-0007-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-005-0007-9

Keywords

Navigation