Skip to main content

Application of CITYgreen model in benefit assessment of Nanjing urban green space in carbon fixation and runoff reduction

Abstract

Based on the analytical framework and calculation principles of the CITYgreen model to assess the benefits of urban green spaces in terms of carbon fixation and runoff reduction, an approach was made to obtain appropriate parameters for this model to calculate the ecological benefits of different urban land use types in the main city of Nanjing. The results indicate that carbon fixation benefits received by the main city of Nanjing is 5%–60% of that by natural forests on a per unit area basis. The ecological value of carbon fixation and runoff reduction of the Nanjing urban green space was about 177 million RMB in total. The ecological benefits of different land use types were in the order of green area > public facilities > residential areas > roads and squares > industrial areas > municipal utilities. This research can provide references for city planning and urban green space establishment and facilitate the popularization of quantitative assessment of ecological benefits of green spaces in Chinese cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Chen S, Zhang X Y, Peng L H (2006). Impervious surface coverage in urban land use based on high resolution satellite images. Resour Sci, 28(2): 41–46 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen S, Jim C Y (2003). Quantitative assessment of the treescape and cityscape of Nanjing, China. Landscape Ecol, 18: 811–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Z X, Su X H, Liu S Z (1998). Study of ecological effect of urban green space in Beijing. Chin Landscape Architech, 14(2): 51–54 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guo YW, Sun C L, Shan W D (1997). Study on evaluation of forest ecological functions. Environ Dev, 12(1): 13–16 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Han H X, Gao J, Liu G L (2003). Ecological benefit assessment of urban vegetations by remote sensing and GIS. Chin J Appl Ecol, 14(12): 2301–2304 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hu Z B, He X Y, Chen W, Li Y H (2003a). Structure and ecological benefits of urban forest in Shenyang build-up area. Chin J Appl Ecol, 14(12): 2108–2112 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hu Z B, He X Y, LI Y H (2003b). Development and application of urban forest management information system based on CITYgreen model. Chin J Ecol, 22(6): 181–185 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang D T (2005). Study on the function and benefit calculation of manufacturing oxygen and fixing carbolic of forest. East Chin For Manag, 19(2): 19–21 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jin F, Lu S W, Yu X X (2005). Forest ecosystem services and its evaluation in China. Chin J Appl Ecol, 16(8): 1531–1536 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lang K J (2004). Linear consociation equation set model of forest ecological benefits. Chin J Appl Ecol, 15(8): 1323–1328 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lang K J, Li C S, Yin Y (2001). The measurement theory and method of 10 forest ecological benefits for forestry ecological engineering. J Northeast For Univ, 28(1): 1–7 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li H, Zhao W Z (1998). Studies on the ecological effects of five urban green land in Beijing city. Chin Landscape Architech, 14(58): 36–38 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li M C, Zhou L B, Mao L (2003). Urban greenbelt ecological benefits evaluation and prediction model based on RS & GIS technology. Environ Monitor Chin, 19(3): 48–51 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li Y D, Wu Z M, Zeng Q B (1998). Estimation of community productivity and net CO2 accumulation of a tropical mountain rain forest in Jianfengling, Hainan Island, China. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 22(2): 127–134 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lin Y D (2003). Studies on the ecological effect of urban greens. Chin Landscape Architech, 19(11): 36–38 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ren Z Y, Li J (2003). The valuation of ecological services from the vegetation ecosystems in the Qingling-Daba Mountains. Acta Geogr Sin, 22(2): 127–134 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tian GX, Yang WF, Tian C (2001). Study on the ecological benefits of urban green land in Zhengzhou and its optimum model. Henan Sci, 9(3): 300–303 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang L X, Zhang Z Q (2001). Impacts of forest vegetation on watershed runoff in dryland areas. J Nat Resour, 16(5): 439–444 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xiao H, Ouyang Z Y, Zhao J Z (2000). Forest ecosystem services and their ecological valuation: A case study of tropical forest in Jianfengling of Hainan island. Chin J Appl Ecol, 11(4): 481–484 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu Y P (2002). Urban Water Resource and Water Environment. Guiyang: Guizhou People Press: 146–149 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang Q, Chen Z H (2002). A study on indirect valuation of the forest ecosystem in Baiyun Mountain. Ecol Sci, 21(1): 72–75 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou Z X, Shao T Y, Tang W P (2001). The different urban Greenland spatial patterns and their environmental effects: A case of the central district of Yichang city, Hubei Province. Acta Ecol Sin, 24(2): 186–192 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu N, Li M, Zhai Y X (2002). Ecological functions of green land system in Harbin. Chin J Appl Ecol, 13(19): 1117–1120 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuang Chen.

Additional information

__________

Translated from the Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(6): 1293–1298 [译自: 应用生态学报]

About this article

Cite this article

Peng, L., Chen, S., Liu, Y. et al. Application of CITYgreen model in benefit assessment of Nanjing urban green space in carbon fixation and runoff reduction. Front. For. China 3, 177–182 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11461-008-0035-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • CITYgreen model
  • urban green space
  • carbon storage
  • carbon sequestration rate
  • runoff reduction volume