Skip to main content
Log in

Government size, market-orientation and regional corruption: Evidence from the provincial level panel data

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Economics in China

Abstract

Using a panel data at the provincial level during the period of 1989–2004, this paper examines the effects of social and economic factors such as government scale, privatization, openness, and education on regional corruption. Applying a fixed-effect model and IV estimation, we find that government size positively affects the incidence rate of corruption, and the effect becomes larger with the increase in the size of the core department of the government. 1% increase in the core department of the government leads to a 0.68%–1% increase in the number of corruption cases. While the proportion of FDI is positively associated with the corruption of regional officials, the ratio of the import and export trade to GDP is negatively associated with corruption. The impact of privatization on corruption is ambiguous. We also identify the significant impacts of the size and structure of the government expenditure on corruption.

摘要

运用中国 1989 年至 2004 年的省级面板数据, 系统考察了地区政府规模、 民营化、 经济开放程度、 教育水平等社会经济因素对官员腐败的影响。 通过运用固定效应模型和工具变量方法, 发现: 政府规模的扩大会增加地区腐败案件的发生率, 而核心政府部门规模的影响更为明显, 党政部门规模上升1%至少会带动腐败犯罪案件提高0.68%–1%。 FDI 比例的提高会增加地区的官员腐败水平, 而进出口比例的提高却有助于降低地区的腐败水平。 民营化程度的影响却不确定。 我们还发现政府支出规模和结构也对一个地区的官员腐败产生显著影响。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ades A, Di Tella R (1999). Rents, Competition, and Corruption. American Economic Review, 89: 982–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adsera A, Boix C, Payne M (2000). Are you being served? Political accountability and quality of government. RES working paper

  • Banerjee A (1997). A theory of misgovernance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4): 1289–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan P (1997). Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3): 1320–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker G, Stigler G (1974). Law enforcement, malfeasance and the compensation of enforcers. Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1): 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss C, Di Tella R (1997). Does competition kill corruption? Journal of Political Economy, 105(5): 1001–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruenett A, Weder B (2003). A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics. 87: 1801–1824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow G (2005). Corruption and China’s economic reform in the early 21st century. Princeton University, CEPS Working Paper, No. 116

  • Clarke G, Xu C (2004). Privatization, competition, and corruption: How characteristics of bribe takers and payers affect bribes to utilities. Journal of Public Economics, 88: 2067–2097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella R, Schargrodsky E (2003). The role of wages and auditing during a crackdown on corruption in the city of Buenos Aires. Journal of Law and Economics, 46(1): 269–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov S, Glaeser E, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2003). The new comparative economics. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4): 595–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisman R, Gatti R (2002). Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics, 83(3): 325–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerring J, Thacker S C (2005). Political institutions and corruption: The role of unitarism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political science, 34: 295–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E, Goldin C (2006). Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America’s Economic History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E, Saks R (2006). Corruption in America. Journal of Public Economics, 90: 1053–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2004). Do institutions cause growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 9(3): 271–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graeff P, Mehlkop G (2003). The impact of economic freedom on corruption: Different patterns for rich and poor countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 19: 605–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman A, Katz E (1987). Hierarchical structures and the social costs of bribes and transfers. Journal of Public Economics, 34: 129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C (1986). Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwong J (1997). The Political Economy of Corruption in China. New York: Armonk Press

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1999). The Quality of Government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1): 222–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont J, N’Guessan T (1999). Competition and corruption in an agency relationship. Journal of Development Economics, 60(2): 271–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu X (2000). Cadres and Corruption: the Organization Involution of the Chinese Communist Party. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro P (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3): 681–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A, Vishny R (1993). Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 599–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A, Vishny R (1998). The Grabbing Hand, Government Pathologies and Their Cures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson J (2005). Eight questions about corruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3):19–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rickeghem C, Weder B (2001). Bureaucratic corruption and the rate of temptation: Do wages in the civil service affect corruption and by how much? Journal of Development Economics, 65(2): 207–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedeman A (2004). The intensification of corruption in China. The China Quarterly, 180: 895–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei S, Shleifer A (2000). Local corruption and global capital flows. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 303–354

  • 樊 纲, 王 小鲁 (Fan Gang, Wang Xiaolu) (2000). 中国市场化指数—各地区市场化相对进程报告 (2000 年) (Chinese Market-oriented Indices—Report of the Relative Process of Various Regional Marketization (2000)). 北京: 经济科学出版社

    Google Scholar 

  • 樊 纲, 王 小鲁 (Fan Gang, Wang Xiaolu) (2001). 中国市场化指数—各地区市场化相对进程报告 (2001 年) (Chinese Market-oriented Indices-Report of the Relative Process of Various Regional Marketization (2001)). 北京: 经济科学出版社

    Google Scholar 

  • 樊 纲, 王 小鲁 (Fan Gang, Wang Xiaolu) (2004). 中国市场化指数—各地区市场化相对进程报告 (2004 年) (Chinese Market-oriented Indices-Report of the Relative Process of Various Regional Marketization (2004)). 北京: 经济科学出版社

    Google Scholar 

  • 樊 纲, 王 小鲁 (Fan Gang, Wang Xiaolu) (2006). 中国市场化指数—各地区市场化相对进程报告 (2006 年) (Chinese Market-oriented Indices-Report of the Relative Process of Various Regional Marketization (2006)). 北京: 经济科学出版社

    Google Scholar 

  • 刘 文革, 张 广中, 曲 振涛 (Liu Wenge, Zhang Guangzhong, Qu Zhentao) (2003). 道德文化、 腐败与经济转型—对中国转型期一个基于道德腐败的经济学分析 (Moral culture, corruption and economic transition-Economic analysis of the period of Chinese transition based on moral corruption). 经济研究, (12)

  • 孙 刚, 路 铭, 张 吉鹏 (Sun Gang, Lu Ming, Zhang Jipeng) (2005). 反腐败、 市场建设与经济增长 (Anti-corruption, market development and economic growth). 经济学 (季刊), 第4 卷增刊

  • 谢 平, 陆 磊 (Xie Ping, Lu Lei) (2003). 资源配置和产出效应: 金融腐败的宏观经济成本 Allocation of resources and output effect: The macroeconomic cost of financial corruption. 经济研究, (11)

  • 杨 灿明, 赵 福军 (Yang Canming, Zhao Fujun) (2004). 行政腐败的宏观经济学分析 Macro-economic analysis of administrative corruption. 经济研究, (9)

  • 周 黎安 (Zhou Li’an) (2008). 转型中的地方政府: 官员激励与治理 (Local Government in Transition: Incentive and Management of Officials). 上海: 格致出版社, 上海人民出版社

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li’an Zhou.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Jingji Yanjiu 经济研究 (Economic Research Journal), 2008, (11): 16–26

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, L., Tao, J. Government size, market-orientation and regional corruption: Evidence from the provincial level panel data. Front. Econ. China 4, 425–448 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11459-009-0023-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11459-009-0023-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

关键词

Navigation