Abstract
The equity premium puzzle is found during the test of the Consumption-based Capital Asset Pricing Model (CCAPM) with aggregate consumption data. Because of income disparity, many consumers lack financial assets to intertemporally allocate their consumptions under income constraints. Thus, it is likely to lead to a specification error by employing aggregate consumption data to test the CCAPM. This paper examines the impacts of the economically constrained (low-income) consumers and unconstrained (high-income) consumers on the CCAPM using urban consumption expenditures in China delineated by consumer income, and tests the income constraint hypothesis. The empirical results show that the CCAPM is not more consistent with the consumption pattern of the higher-income consumers. Including the income constraint into the analyses of the consumption and asset returns does not unravel the equity premium puzzle.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attanasio O P, Weber G (1995). Is consumption growth consistent with intertemporal optimization? Evidence from the consumer expenditures survey. Journal of Political Economy, 103(6): 1121–1157
Breeden D T (1979). An intertemporal Asset Pricing Model with stochastic consumption and investment opportunities. Journal of Financial Economics, (7): 265–296
Campbell J Y (1993). Intertemporal asset pricing without consumption data. American Economy Review. 83(3): 487–512
Campbell J Y (1996). Consumption and the stock market: Interpreting international experience. Swedish Economic Policy Review, (3): 251–299
Campbell J Y, Lo A W, MacKinlay A C (1997). The econometrics of financial markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Cumby R E (1990). Consumption risk and international equity returns: Some empirical evidence. Journal of International Money and Finance, (9): 182–192
Hansen L P, Singleton K J (1982). Generalized instrumental variables estimation of nonlinear rational expectations models. Econometrica, 50(5): 1269–1286
Hansen L P, Singleton K J (1983). Stochastic consumption, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of stock market returns. Journal of Political Economy, 91: 249–265
Lintner J (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47: 13–37
Lucas R (1978). Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica, 46(6): 1429–1445
Mankiw N G, Zeldes S P (1991). The consumption of stockholders and non-stockholders. Journal of Financial Economics, 29(1), 97–112
Mehra R Prescott E C (1985). The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15(2): 145–161
Sharpe W (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19: 425–442
Smoluk H J, Neveu R P (2002). Consumption and asset prices: An analysis across income groups. Review of Financial Economics, 11: 47–62
Weil P (1989). The equity premium puzzle and the risk-free rate puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, (24): 401–421
Wheatley S (1988). Some tests of the consumption-based Asset Pricing Model. Journal of Monetary Economics, (22): 193–215
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, L. Chinese consumption and asset returns: An analysis across income groups. Front. Econ. China 2, 275–288 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11459-007-0015-z
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11459-007-0015-z