Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The location choice of Chinese investment in the United States: Industrial agglomeration, ethnic networks and firm heterogeneity

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China’s outward foreign direct investment (FDI) is different from traditional FDI in various ways, for example being rooted in “Guanxi” in Chinese culture, influenced by government, and located in developed economies where they have limited ownership advantages compared with local firms. Chinese investment in the United States (the U.S.) is an example of how the location is influenced by economic factors, social linkages, as well as geopolitical events, such as the U.S.-China trade conflict, which deserves more academic attention. It is such a complex phenomenon that cannot be fully explained by traditional FDI theories, which mainly focus on economic factors. In this paper, we illustrate the historical development, distribution and firm heterogeneity of Chinese investment in the U.S. from 2000 to 2020, and use a conditional logit model to investigate the location factors. Our study reveals that the number of Chinese investment projects in the U.S. peaked in 2017 and has declined year-over-year since then. These projects are mainly located along the East and West coasts of the U.S. and around the Great Lakes, with the largest numbers in California and New York. Previous Chinese investment agglomeration and ethnic networks both influence the location choice of China’s outward FDI, even when controlling for regional attributes and economic embeddedness. In terms of firm heterogeneity, Chinese firms that enter the American market with greenfield investment modes, state-owned enterprises and firms in high-tech sectors are more likely to follow previous Chinese investment, but place less emphasis on Chinese ethnic linkages, implying that previous Chinese investment agglomeration can replace the role of Chinese ethnic networks for these firms. Finally, the U.S.-China trade conflict has significantly lessened the active role of Chinese ethnic networks and has reduced Chinese investment in states with higher industrial output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alami I, Dixon A D, 2020. The strange geographies of the ‘new’ state capitalism. Political Geography, 82: 102237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amighini A A, Rabellotti R, Sanfilippo M, 2013. Do Chinese state-owned and private enterprises differ in their internationalization strategies? China Economic Review, 27: 312–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J, Sutherland D, 2015. Entry mode and emerging market MNEs: An analysis of Chinese greenfield and acquisition FDI in the United States. Research in International Business and Finance, 35: 88–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspelund A, Butsko V, 2010. Small and middle-sized enterprises’ offshoring production: A study of firm decisions and consequences. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 101(3): 262–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady D, Wallace M, 2000. Spatialization, foreign direct investment, and labor outcomes in the American States, 1978–1996. Social Forces, 79(1): 67–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brienen M J, Burger M J, van Oort F G, 2013. The geography of Chinese and Indian greenfield investments in Europe. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 51(2): 254–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley P J, Clegg L J, Cross A R et al., 2007. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley P J, Clegg L J, Voss H et al., 2018. A retrospective and agenda for future research on Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(1): 4–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Chen T J, 1998. Network linkages and location choice in foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3): 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Wuzhati Y, Xiong W et al., 2020. Exploring the role of overseas industrial parks in Chinese outward foreign direct investment: A case study of Sihanoukville Special Economic Zone. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(6): 1210–1222. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Child J, Rodrigues S B, 2005. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review, 1(3): 381–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng P, 2004. Outward investment by Chinese MNCs: Motivations and implications. Business Horizons, 47(3): 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng P, 2007. Investing for strategic resources and its rationale: The case of outward FDI from Chinese companies. Business Horizons, 50(1): 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning J H, 1988. The Eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning J H, 1993. International direct investment patterns. In: Oxelheim L ed. The Global Race for Foreign Direct Investment: Prospects for the Future. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 107–132.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fan P, 2011. Innovation, globalization, and catch-up of latecomers: Cases of Chinese telecom firms. Environment and Planning A, 43(4): 830–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao T, 2003. Ethnic Chinese networks and international investment: Evidence from inward FDI in China. Journal of Asian Economics, 14(4): 611–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur A S, Ma X, Ding Z, 2018. Home country supportiveness/unfavorableness and outward foreign direct investment from China. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(3): 324–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glückler J, 2006. A relational assessment of international market entry in management consulting. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3): 369–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu J, 2009. China’s private enterprises in Africa and the implications for African development. The European Journal of Development Research, 21(4): 570–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen T, 2012. Size, location and agglomeration of inward foreign direct investment (FDI) in the United States. Regional Studies, 46(5): 669–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann T, Rosen D H, Gao C et al., 2019. Two-way street: 2019 update US-China direct investment trends. Rhodium Group. https://rhg.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/RHG_TWS-2019_Full-Report_8May2019-1.pdf.

  • He L, Jiang R, Bennett M M, 2020. The rise of Chinese foreign direct investment in the United States: Disentangling investment strategies of state-owned and private enterprises. Growth and Change, 51(4): 1562–1587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez E, 2014. Finding a home away from home. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1): 73–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu J Y, Saxenian A, 2000. The limits of Guanxi capitalism: Transnational collaboration between Taiwan and the USA. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 32 (11): 1991–2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jean R J B, Tan D, Sinkovics R R, 2011. Ethnic ties, location choice, and firm performance in foreign direct investment: A study of Taiwanese business groups FDI in China. International Business Review, 20(6): 627–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne J E, 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8: 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones J, Serwicka I, Wren C, 2020. Motives for foreign direct investment location in Europe and EU enlargement. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52 (8): 1681–1699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang Y, Jiang F, 2012. FDI location choice of Chinese multinationals in East and Southeast Asia: Traditional economic factors and institutional perspective. Journal of World Business, 47(1): 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karreman B, Burger M J, van Oort F G, 2016. Location choices of Chinese multinationals in Europe: The role of overseas communities. Economic Geography, 93(2): 131–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley D, Coner J K, Lyles M A, 2013. Chinese foreign direct investment in the United States: Location choice determinants and strategic implications for the State of Indiana. Business Horizons, 56(4): 443–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J U, Aguilera R V, 2016. Foreign location choice: Review and extensions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2): 133–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klossek A, Linke B M, Nippa M, 2012. Chinese enterprises in Germany: Establishment modes and strategies to mitigate the liability of foreignness. Journal of World Business, 47(1): 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad I, Wiig A, 2012. What determines Chinese outward FDI? Journal of World Business, 47(1): 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P, 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3): 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Xia J, Shapiro D et al., 2018. Institutional compatibility and the internationalization of Chinese SOEs: The moderating role of home subnational institutions. Journal of World Business, 53(5): 641–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, 2023. Impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative on regional outward FDI from China based on evidence from 2000 to 2015. ZFW: Advances in Economic Geography, 67(1): 20–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang Y, Zhou Z, Liu Y, 2019. Location choices of Chinese enterprises in Southeast Asia: The role of overseas Chinese networks. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(8): 1396–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin G C S, 2000. State, capital, and space in China in an age of volatile globalization. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 32(3): 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin L, Wang D, Si Y, 2018. The limits of Guanxi for Chinese Nationals doing business abroad: Empirical investigation into Chinese companies in Germany. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 109(3): 420–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling L, Ying T, 2008. The internationalisation of Chinese enterprises: The analysis of the UK case. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 4(1): 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Jiang J, Zhang L et al., 2018. OFDI agglomeration and Chinese firm location decisions under the “Belt and Road” Initiative. Sustainability, 10(11): 4060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Yao Q, 2021. Theorizing Belt and Road construction mode from institutional and cultural perspectives. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31(5): 623–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Li X, Zhu X et al., 2023. The theoretical systems of OFDI location determinants in global north and global south economies. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10(1): 1–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D, 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P ed. Frontiers in Econometrics. Salt Lake City: Academic Press, 105–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng G, Wang R, Wang S, 2023. A review of China’s overseas economic and trade cooperation zones along the Belt and Road: Progress and prospects. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 33(7): 1505–1526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul J, Benito G R G, 2018. A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: What do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading? Asia Pacific Business Review, 24(1): 90–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelegrín A, Bolancé C, 2008. Regional foreign direct investment in manufacturing: Do agglomeration economies matter? Regional Studies, 42(4): 505–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins R, Neumayer E, 2005. The international diffusion of new technologies: A multitechnology analysis of latecomer advantage and global economic integration. Annals of The Association of American Geographers, 95(4): 789–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy B, Yeung M, Laforet S, 2012. China’s outward foreign direct investment: Location choice and firm ownership. Journal of World Business, 47(1): 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schüller M, Schüler-Zhou Y, 2017. Chinese investment strategies and migration: Does diaspora matter? A case study on Germany. In: Marco S, Agnieszka W eds. Chinese Migration and Economic Relations with Europe. London: Routledge, 140–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen Z, Puig F, 2018. Spatial dependence of the FDI entry mode decision: Empirical evidence from emerging market enterprises. Management International Review, 58(1): 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng H, Dai X, He C, 2023. Gone with the epidemic? The spatial effects of the Covid-19 on global investment network. Applied Geography, 156: 102978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Si Y, Liefner I, Wang T, 2013. Foreign direct investment with Chinese characteristics: A middle path between Ownership-Location-Internalization model and Linkage-Leverage-Learning. Chinese Geographical Science, 23(5): 594–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD, 2023. World Investment Report 2023: Investing in Sustainable Energy for All. United Nations Publication.

  • Wang J, Wei Y D, Lin B, 2020. Functional division and location choices of Chinese outward FDI: The case of ICT firms. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(5): 937–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Meng G, Zhou J et al., 2021. Analysis on geo-effects of China’s overseas industrial parks: A case study of Cambodia Sihanoukville Special Economic Zone. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31(5): 712–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei Y D, Zhou Y, Sun Y et al., 2012. Production and R&D networks of foreign ventures in China: Implications for technological dynamism and regional development. Applied Geography, 32(1): 106–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf M, Terrell D, 2016. “The high-tech industry, what is it and why it matters to our economic future,” Beyond the Numbers: Employment & Unemployment, Vol. 5, No. 8 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2016), https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-5/the-high-tech-industry-what-is-it-and-why-it-matters-to-our-economic-future.htm.

  • Wu L, Sutherland D, Peng X et al., 2023. Are Chinese MNEs more strongly attracted to global cities and knowledge intensive city clusters than developed market MNEs when undertaking greenfield strategic asset seeking related FDI? Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 33(3): 534–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuzhati Y, Zhang W, Liu Z, 2017. Development modes of China’s overseas industrial parks along the Belt and Road. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32(4): 355–362. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, 2012. Restructuring the export-oriented industrialization in the Pearl River Delta, China: Institutional evolution and emerging tension. Applied Geography, 32(1): 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang R, Bathelt H, 2021. China’s outward investment activity: Ambiguous findings in the literature and empirical trends in greenfield investments. Growth and Change, 53(1): 313–341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung H W, Liu W, 2013. Globalizing China: The rise of mainland firms in the global economy. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 49(1): 57–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z, Chen M, 2019. The impact of trade friction on China’s outward direct investment: An empirical study based on overseas anti-dumping on China. World Economy Studies, (12): 108–120, 133. (in Chinese)

  • Zaheer S, Lamin A, Subramani M, 2008. Cluster capabilities or ethnic ties? Location choice by foreign and domestic entrants in the services offshoring industry in India. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6): 944–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, 2017. The role of migration in shaping China’s economic relations with its main partners. In: Marco S, Agnieszka W eds. Chinese Migration and Economic Relations with Europe. London: Routledge, 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Long X, 2018. Does China’s outward foreign direct investment have the motivation to jump the trade barriers. Journal of International Trade, (1): 135–144. (in Chinese)

  • Zhao S, Wang X, Li K et al., 2022. Evolution and influencing factors of the transnational investment network of China-Africa international cooperation parks. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32(11): 2205–2228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng L, Liu Z, 2015. Spatial pattern of Chinese outward direct investment in the Belt and Road Initiative area. Progress in Geography, 34(5): 563–570. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou K, Kumar S, Yu L et al., 2021. The economic policy uncertainty and the choice of entry mode of outward foreign direct investment: Cross-border M&A or greenfield investment. Journal of Asian Economics, 74: 101306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, 1998. Beyond ethnic enclaves: Location strategies of Chinese producer service firms in Los Angeles. Economic Geography, 74(3): 228–251.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China

    Yuefang Si & Hanyan Sun

  2. School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, China

    Yuefang Si, Hanyan Sun & Junsong Wang

  3. Institute for Global Innovation & Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China

    Junsong Wang

  4. Department of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China

    Xinyi Liang

Authors
  1. Yuefang Si
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hanyan Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Junsong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xinyi Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junsong Wang.

Additional information

Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.42130510; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41871110; The National Social Science Fund of China, No.23BJL113

Author: Si Yuefang (1982–), PhD and Professor, specialized in Chinese outward FDI, firm innovation and innovation networks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Si, Y., Sun, H., Wang, J. et al. The location choice of Chinese investment in the United States: Industrial agglomeration, ethnic networks and firm heterogeneity. J. Geogr. Sci. 34, 985–1006 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-024-2236-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-024-2236-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation