Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Zoning framework and policy implications of sustainable development by coupling multilevel in Beijing, China

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurately diagnosing and assessing complicated spatial linkages at various scales has become a crucial strategy for enhancing the efficacy of urban government policies and initiatives in the modern era. There is still room for improvement in identifying spatial scale disparities and coupling linkages in cities, although the standard research paradigm on urban sustainability has produced numerous positive outcomes. To advance urban sustainability research from the perspective of spatial coupling, this study used cluster and cross-tabulation analyses for considering urban sustainable development patterns from the requirements of both development scale and spatial accuracy. Subsequently, the spatial unit coupling relationship between district and street scales was explored. Our findings indicated significant scale dependence in the spatial divergence between the built environment sustainability levels of streets and the economic, social, and environmental sustainability levels of districts. The implication is that significant differences exist in the built environment levels of various sustainable development type districts. The scale effect of the spatial coupling relationship influences urban planning and the transition of sustainable development. Maintaining reasonable population density and maximizing the structure and quality of social public resources supply are priorities for streets with the highest habitat sustainability that are located in low-growth type districts. Priority should be given to population deconcentration for high habitat sustainable streets located in synergistic development type districts to increase the level of public service protection. Supporting facilities should be added to medium sustainable streets in low-growth areas to increase the mix of land use, which should encourage additional production activity concentration, thereby fostering overall economic strength. Further, increasing the accessibility of local public service facilities for low and medium sustainable streets located in ecologically biased areas should be prioritized, but a green and low-carbon orientation should be maintained during building.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson E, Janssen H, Ham M V et al., 2023. Contextual poverty and obtained educational level and income in Sweden and the Netherlands: A multi-scale and longitudinal study. Urban Studies, 60(5): 885–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berardi U, 2013. Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15(6): 1573–1591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolster A, Burgess S, Johnston R et al., 2007. Neighbourhoods, households and income dynamics: A semi-parametric investigation of neighbourhood effects. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(1): 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouzguenda I, Alalouch C, Fava N, 2019. Towards smart sustainable cities: A review of the role digital citizen participation could play in advancing social sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50: 101627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho M J, Melo-Gonçalves P, Teixeira J C et al., 2016. Regionalization of Europe based on a K-Means Cluster Analysis of the climate change of temperatures and precipitation. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 94: 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R, Kockelman K, 1997. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, design and diversity. Transportation Research Part D, 2(3): 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Chi G, 2022. Urbanization and ecosystem services: The multi-scale spatial spillover effects and spatial variations. Land Use Policy, 114: 105964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng W, Peng Z, Tang Y, 2019. A quick assessment method to evaluate sustainability of urban built environment: Case studies of four large-sized Chinese cities. Cities, 89: 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng Y, Qi W, Fu B et al., 2020. Geographical transformations of urban sprawl: Exploring the spatial heterogeneity across cities in China 1992–2015. Cities, 105: 102415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding X, Zhong W, Shearmur R G et al., 2015. An inclusive model for assessing the sustainability of cities in developing countries: Trinity of Cities’ Sustainability from Spatial, Logical and Time Dimensions (TCS-SLTD). Journal of Cleaner Production, 109: 62–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Q, Yi P, Li W et al., 2022. Evaluation of city sustainability using the HGRW method: A case study of urban agglomeration on the West Side of the Straits, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358: 132008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing R, Cervero R, 2010. Travel and the Built Environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3): 265–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang C, Zhou C, Gu C et al., 2017. A proposal for the theoretical analysis of the interactive coupled effects between urbanization and the eco-environment in mega-urban agglomerations. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 27(12): 1431–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Zou L, Yuan H et al., 2022. The spatial spillover effects and impact paths of financial agglomeration on green development: Evidence from 285 prefecture-level cities in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 340: 130816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frini A, Benamor S, Urli B, 2020. Temporal MCDA methods for decision-making in sustainable development context. In: Kulshreshtha S N (ed.), Sustainability Concept in Developing Countries. IntechOpen, Rijeka.

  • Fu S, Zhuo H, Song H et al., 2020. Examination of a coupling coordination relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment: A case study in Qingdao, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(19): 23981–23993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong J, 1996. On the idea and concept of sustainable development. China Population, Resources and Environment, (3): 9–13.

  • Gonzalez-Garcia S, Manteiga R, Moreira M T et al., 2018. Assessing the sustainability of Spanish cities considering environmental and socio-economic indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178: 599–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodach C, 2011. Barriers to sustainable economic development: The Dallas-Fort Worth experience. Cities, 28(4): 300–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haider H, Hewage K, Umer A et al., 2018. Sustainability assessment framework for small-sized urban neighbourhoods: An application of fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 36: 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halla P, Merino-Saum A, 2022. Conceptual frameworks in indicator-based assessments of urban sustainability: An analysis based on 67 initiatives. Sustainable Development, 30(5): 1056–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan A M, Lee H, 2015. The paradox of the sustainable city: Definitions and examples. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(6): 1267–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson M, Marvin S, 2017. Intensifying or transforming sustainable cities? Fragmented logics of urban environmentalism. Local Environment, 22(Suppl.1): 8–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu W-L, Shen X, Xu H et al., 2021. Integrated evaluations of resource and environment carrying capacity of the Huaihe River Ecological and Economic Belt in China. Land, 10(11): 1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Hu X, Wang J et al., 2023. How diversity and accessibility affect street vitality in historic districts? Land, 12(1): 219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahn S, Newig J, Lang D J et al., 2022. Demarcating transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Five clusters of research modes based on evidence from 59 research projects. Sustainable Development, 30(2): 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing F, Glass T A, Curriero F C et al., 2010. The built environment and obesity: A systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Health & Place, 16(2): 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong Q, Kong H, Miao S et al., 2022. Spatial coupling coordination evaluation between population growth, land use and housing supply of urban agglomeration in China. Land, 11(9): 1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Zhang J, 2015. Research on the transformation characteristic and driving mechanism of Chinese capital economy and the countermeasures on that. China Business and Market, 29(8): 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Li X, Niu N et al., 2023. Uneven impacts of COVID-19 on residents’ utilization of urban parks: A case study of Guangzhou, China. Applied Geography, 153: 102905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Yi P, 2020. Assessment of city sustainability: Coupling coordinated development among economy, society and environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256: 120453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang Y, Yi P, Li W et al., 2022. Evaluation of urban sustainability based on GO-SRA: Case study of Ha-Chang and mid-southern Liaoning urban agglomerations in northeastern China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 87: 104234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu K, Lin B, 2019. Research on influencing factors of environmental pollution in China: A spatial econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206: 356–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luederitz C, Lang D J, Von Wehrden H, 2013. A systematic review of guiding principles for sustainable urban neighborhood development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 118: 40–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurka A, 2021. Spatio-temporal hierarchical cluster analysis of mining-induced seismicity in coal mines using Ward’s minimum variance method. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 184: 104249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer A L, 2008. Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems. Environment International, 34(2): 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalina D, Mederly P, Diefenbacher H et al., 2021. Sustainable urban development: A review of urban sustainability indicator frameworks. Sustainability, 13(16): 9348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori K, Yamashita T, 2015. Methodological framework of sustainability assessment in city sustainability index (CSI): A concept of constraint and maximisation indicators. Habitat International, 45: 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouratidis K, 2021. Urban planning and quality of life: A review of pathways linking the built environment to subjective well-being. Cities, 115: 103229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor S, Doyle E, Doran J, 2018. Diversity, employment growth and spatial spillovers amongst Irish regions. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 68: 260–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogasawara Y, Kon M, 2021. Two clustering methods based on the Ward’s method and dendrograms with interval-valued dissimilarities for interval-valued data. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 129: 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrović A, Van Ham M, Manley D, 2022. Where do neighborhood effects end? Moving to multiscale spatial contextual effects. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 112(2): 581–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu Y, Jiang G, Yang Y et al., 2018. Multi-scale analysis on spatial morphology differentiation and formation mechanism of rural residential land: A case study in Shandong province, China. Habitat International, 71: 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seto K C, Fragkias M, Güneralp B et al., 2011. A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE, 6(8): e23777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi A, Murayama A, 2013. A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38: 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi M R, Keivani R, Brownill S et al., 2020. Promoting social sustainability of urban neighbourhoods: The case of Bethnal Green, London. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1468–2427. 12946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinaga K P, Yang M-S, 2020. Unsupervised K-Means Clustering Algorithm. IEEE Access, 8: 80716–80727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun M, Wang J, He K, 2020. Analysis on the urban land resources carrying capacity during urbanization: A case study of Chinese YRD. Applied Geography, 116: 102170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan P Y, Samsudin R, 2017. Effects of spatial scale on assessment of spatial equity of urban park provision. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158: 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian G, Wu J, Yang Z, 2010. Spatial pattern of urban functions in the Beijing metropolitan region. Habitat International, 34(2): 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Too L, Earl G, 2010. Public transport service quality and sustainable development: A community stakeholder perspective. Sustainable Development, 18(1): 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Presidency, 2005. Conclusions of ministerial informal meeting on sustainable communities in Europe [known as Bristol Accord]. London: ODPM.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN, 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat, 2001. Sustainable Cities Programme 1990–2000: A decade of United Nations support to broad-based participatory management of urban development. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Lei Y, Wang C et al., 2022. The spatio-temporal impacts of the built environment on urban vitality: A study based on big data. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 42(2): 274–283. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Tian J, Yang P et al., 2021. Multi-scale features of regional poverty and the impact of geographic capital: A case study of Yanbian Korean autonomous prefecture in Jilin province, China. Land, 10(12): 1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Xu Z, Yuan Q et al., 2020. Evaluation and countermeasures of sustainable development for urban energy-economy-environment system: A case study of Jinan in China. Sustainable Development, 28(6): 1663–1677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Yang F-L, Xu L et al., 2013. Multi-scale analysis of the water resources carrying capacity of the Liaohe Basin based on ecological footprints. Journal of Cleaner Production, 53: 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Cao K, Lin J, 2022. Research progress and prospects for multiscale assessment framework and indicator system for sustainable cities. Urban Development Studies, 29(11): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, 2022. Managing land carrying capacity: Key to achieving sustainable production systems for food security. Land, 11(4): 484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston N, 2022. Sustainable community development: Integrating social and environmental sustainability for sustainable housing and communities. Sustainable Development, 30(1): 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, 2013. Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28(6): 999–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia X, Lin K, Ding Y et al., 2021. Research on the coupling coordination relationships between urban function mixing degree and urbanization development level based on information entropy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1): 242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Chen J, Wang X et al., 2022. Regional green development level and its spatial spillover effects: Empirical evidence from Hubei province, China. Ecological Indicators, 143: 109312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y, Dai H, Dong H et al., 2016. Economic impacts from PM2.5 pollution-related health effects in China: A provincial-level analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(9): 4836–4843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue B, Liu B, Yang Q et al., 2021. Formalizing an evaluation-prediction based roadmap towards urban sustainability: A case study of Chenzhou, China. Habitat International, 112: 102376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi P, Li W, Zhang D, 2021. Sustainability assessment and key factors identification of first-tier cities in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281: 125369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yigitcanlar T, Dur F, Dizdaroglu D, 2015. Towards prosperous sustainable cities: A multiscalar urban sustainability assessment approach. Habitat International, 45: 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Liu Y, Tleubergenova A et al., 2022. Evaluation of urban sustainability based on development structures and economic aggregates: A case study of Jiaxing, China. Sustainability, 14(17): 10683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Ji G, Tian Y et al., 2018. Environmental vulnerability assessment for mainland of China based on entropy method. Ecological Indicators, 91: 410–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng S, Yang S, Ma M et al., 2023. Linking cultural ecosystem service and urban ecological-space planning for a sustainable city: Case study of the core areas of Beijing under the context of urban relieving and renewal. Sustainable Cities and Society, 89: 104292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou G, Li C, Li M et al., 2016. Agglomeration and diffusion of urban functions: An approach based on urban land use conversion. Habitat International, 56: 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Wu T, Wang Y, 2022. Urban expansion simulation and development-oriented zoning of rapidly urbanising areas: A case study of Hangzhou. Science of The Total Environment, 807: 150813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Z, He Q, Qin W, 2020. Spatial livability of residential areas in Changsha city. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 40(11): 1859–1867. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumelzu A, Gruehn D, Hosni J, 2019. Assessment of sustainability of the built environment in Latin American neighbourhoods: Five cases in southern Chile. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 297(1): 012040.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China

    Wenxue Wang & Yu Deng

  2. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modelling, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China

    Yu Deng

Authors
  1. Wenxue Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Deng.

Additional information

Foundation: National Key R&D Program of China, No.2022YFC3800803; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.42271218

Author: Wang Wenxue (1998–), Master, specialized in urban geography and sustainable urban development. E-mail: wangwx.20s@igsnrr.ac.cn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, W., Deng, Y. Zoning framework and policy implications of sustainable development by coupling multilevel in Beijing, China. J. Geogr. Sci. 33, 2425–2445 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-023-2183-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-023-2183-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation