Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Embodied land in China’s provinces from the perspective of regional trade

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the continuous enhancement of regional connectivity, the indirect use of land resources through the pathways of trade in goods and services plays an increasingly important role in the overall utilization of land resources. Despite this, relevant research in this field is still in its infancy, and few papers have addressed this issue. This paper uses a multi-regional input—output model to calculate the embodied land in the 30 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) and eight regions of China from the perspective of regional trade and further analyzes the spatial pattern of characteristics associated with embodied land flows. The results show that the amount of embodied land occupied by China’s inter-regional trade accounts for 21.39% of the country’s total land, and an average of 38.54% of China’s provincial land demand is met by land exports from other provinces. More than 80% of land consumed by Beijing, Tianjin, and Shanghai is from other provinces. The provinces of Heilongjiang, Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, and Hebei are the largest net exporters of cultivated land, forest and grazing and aquatic land, fishery land, and built-up land, respectively (the outflows account for 42.26%, 27.53%, 38.66%, and 35.28% of the corresponding land types in the province); and Guangdong, Shandong, and Zhejiang are the main net importers. The flow of agricultural land (cultivated land, forest land, grazing land, and aquatic land) generally shows a shift from west to east and from north to south. The regions in northeast and northwest China have the largest scale of agricultural land outflows, mainly into East and South China. In addition, 8.43% of cultivated land, 7.47% of forest land, 6.41% of grazing land, 6.88% of aquatic land, and 18.35% of built-up land in China are provided for foreign use through international trade. This paper provides feasible ideas and a theoretical basis for solving the contradiction between land use and ecological protection, which could potentially help to achieve sustainable land use in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bosire C K, Krol M S, Mekonnen M M et al., 2016. Meat and milk production scenarios and the associated land footprint in Kenya. Agricultural Systems, 145: 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G Q, Han M Y, 2015a. Global supply chain of arable land use: Production-based and consumption-based trade imbalance. Land Use Policy, 49: 118–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G Q, Han M Y, 2015b. Virtual land use change in China 2002–2010: Internal transition and trade imbalance. Land Use Policy, 47: 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Li X, Liu X et al., 2019. Quantifying the teleconnections between local consumption and domestic land uses in China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 187: 60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis S J, Caldeira K, 2010. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(12): 5687–5692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong J W, Kuang W H, Liu J Y, 2018. Continuous land cover change monitoring in the remote sensing big data era. Science China Earth Sciences, 48(2): 259–260. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng K, Chapagain A, Suh S et al., 2011. Comparison of bottom-up and top-down approaches to calculating the water footprints of nations. Economic Systems Research, 23(4SI): 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo S, Liu J B, Shao L et al., 2012. Energy-dominated local carbon emissions in Beijing 2007: Inventory and input-output analysis. Scientific World Journal, 923183.

  • Guo S, Shen G Q, Chen Z et al., 2014. Embodied cultivated land use in China 1987–2007. Ecological Indicators, 47: 198–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han M, Chen G, 2018. Global arable land transfers embodied in mainland of China’s foreign trade. Land Use Policy, 70: 521–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu B Q, Yang W B, Shao H, 2006. Application of virtual land security strategy to the sustainable land use in county territory: A case study of Du’an and Tiandong Guangxi. Tropical Geography, 26(2): 97–101. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo H H, 2015. Review of bio-conversion pathways of lignocellulose-to-ethanol: Sustainability assessment based on land footprint projections. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 46: 100–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger M, Rees W E, 2010. Importing terrestrial biocapacity: The US case and global implications. Land Use Policy, 27(2SI): 589–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin W Q, Wu M H, Zhang Y et al., 2018. Regional differences in China’s urbanization and their driving factors. Science China Earth Sciences, 48(5): 639–650. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H M, Wang K Q, Shi F, 2007. An empirical analysis of virtual land resource imports for food in China. Chinese Rural Economy, (11): 26–33. (in Chinese)

  • Liu J, Hull V, Batistella M et al., 2013. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society, 18(2): 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J Y, Kuang W H, Zhang Z X, 2014. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns and causes of land use changes in China since the late 1980s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(1): 3–14. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J Y, Ning J, Kuang W H et al., 2018a. Spatio-temporal patterns and characteristics of land-use change in China during 2010–2015. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(5): 789–802. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu W D, Tang Z P, Han M Y et al., 2018b. The 2012 China Multi-Regional Input-output Table of 31 Provincial Units. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y H, Guo C X, 2018. Emipirical studies on land embodied in the foreign trade of China: A literature review. China Population, Resources and Environment, 28(11): 65–72. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Long H L, Zhang Y N, Tu S S, 2018. Land consolidation and rural vitalization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(10): 1837–1849. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Z L, 2006. Exploring the sustainable use management of regional land resources based on the virtual land perspective. Land & Resources Herald, 3(2): 17–20. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marselis S M, Feng K, Liu Y et al., 2017. Agricultural land displacement and undernourishment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161: 619–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Ingram J C, Varga A et al., 2015. Get the science right when paying for nature’s services. Science, 347(6227): 1206–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien M, Schuetz H, Bringezu S, 2015. The land footprint of the EU bioeconomy: Monitoring tools, gaps and needs. Land Use Policy, 47: 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters G P, Minx J C, Weber C L et al., 2011. Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(21): 8903–8908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiang W, Liu A, Cheng S et al., 2013a. Agricultural trade and virtual land use: The case of China’s crop trade. Land Use Policy, 33: 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiang W L, Liu A M, Cheng S K et al., 2013b. Quantification of virtual land resources in China’s crop trade. Journal of Natural Resources, 28(8): 1289–1297. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun S, Fang C, Lv J, 2017. Spatial inequality of water footprint in China: A detailed decomposition of inequality from water use types and drivers. Journal of Hydrology, 553: 398–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivanco D F, Sprecher B, Hertwich E, 2017. Scarcity-weighted global land and metal footprints. Ecological Indicators, 83: 323–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y F, Feng R X, Guo T B, 2015. Analysis of virtual land import benefits of China’s major agricultural products. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, (4): 26–35. (in Chinese)

  • Weinzettel J, Hertwich E G, Peters G P et al., 2013. Affluence drives the global displacement of land use. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 23(2): 433–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wichelns D, 2001. The role of ‘virtual water’ in efforts to achieve food security and other national goals, with an example from Egypt. Agricultural Water Management, 49(2): 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Li Y, Chau S N et al., 2020. Impacts of international trade on global sustainable development. Nature Sustainability, 3(11): 964–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Qiuhui, Han Mengyao, Liu Weidong, 2018. Tracking embodied carbon flows in the Belt and Road regions. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(11): 2210–2222. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Feng K, Hubacek K, 2013. Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 23(5SI): 1178–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Wang X, Zhao X et al., 2014. A 2010 update of National Land Use/Cover Database of China at 1:100000 scale using medium spatial resolution satellite images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 149: 142–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Urbanization and Geo-simulation, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China

    Shaojian Wang & Jieyu Wang

Authors
  1. Shaojian Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jieyu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaojian Wang.

Additional information

Foundation

The Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Fund of the Ministry of Education, No.21YJAZH087

Author

Wang Shaojian (1986-), PhD, specialized in urban geography and low-carbon development.

This paper is initially published in Acta Geographica Sinica (Chinese edition), 2022, 77(5): 1072–1085.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Wang, J. Embodied land in China’s provinces from the perspective of regional trade. J. Geogr. Sci. 33, 59–75 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-023-2074-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-023-2074-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation