Skip to main content
Log in

Flow resistance adjustments of channel and bars in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River in response to the operation of the Three Gorges Dam

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the Three Gorges Dam (TGD) was put into operation, the flood water level at an identical discharge rate has not displayed a decreasing trend along the middle reaches of the Yangtze River (MYR). The flow resistance variations of the channel and bars in response to the operation of the TGD remain poorly understood, despite the importance of understanding these for water disaster mitigation and water environment regulation. Herein, the impacts of the TGD on the downstream flow resistance of the channel and bars in the MYR were analyzed using systematic surveys of hydrological datasets, cross- sectional profiles, sediment datasets, and remote sensing images, during different periods. Under the actual natural conditions in the MYR, a modified semi-empirical formula, which considered the grain, dune resistance, as well as the topographic features of the riverbed, was proposed to predict the channel resistance. Furthermore, the effect of various dam-control flow and sediment elements on the variation in different flow resistance components, and the corresponding relationships among them were investigated. Results showed a decline in the comprehensive, channel, and bar resistances as the discharge increased, whereas there was a slight increase when reaching the bank-full discharges. Notably, the bar resistance occupied 65%, while the channel resistance, in which dune resistance was much larger than grain resistance, contributed 35% to the comprehensive resistance. In addition, while flow resistance rose over time, there was a decline as the distance from the TGD increased. In conclusion, the increased dune and bar resistances, interpreted by the fluctuated channel longitudinal profile and growing vegetated area on bars, were the dominant factors preventing the flood water level from dropping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberle J, Nikora V, Henning M et al., 2010. Statistical characterization of bed roughness due to bed forms: A field study in the Elbe River at Aken, Germany. Water Resources Research, 46(3).

  • Afzalimehr H, Singh V P, Najafabadi E F, 2010. Determination of form friction factor. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15(3): 237–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam A M, Kennedy J F, 1969. Friction factors for flow in sand-bed channels. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 95(6): 1973–1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bormann H, Pinter N, Elfert S, 2011. Hydrological signatures of flood trends on German rivers: Flood frequencies, flood heights and specific stages. Journal of Hydrology, 404(1): 50–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao G J, Wang J, 2015. Measurements and Studies of Hydrological and Sediment Data in the Three Gorges Project. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carle M V, Sasser C E, Roberts H H, 2015. Accretion and vegetation community change in the Wax Lake Delta following the historic 2011 Mississippi River flood. Journal of Coastal Research, 31(3): 569–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carling P A, Leyland J, Kleinhans M G et al., 2020. Quantifying fluid retention due to natural vegetation in a forest floodplain analogue using the aggregated dead zone (ADZ) dilution approach. Water Resources Research, 56(9): e2020WR027070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai Y F, Yang Y P, Deng J Y et al., 2020. Evolution characteristics and drivers of the water level at an identical discharge in the Jingjiang reaches of the Yangtze River. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(10): 1633–1648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang F F M, 1970. Ripple concentration and friction factor. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 96(2): 417–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coon W F, 1998. Estimation of roughness coefficients for natural stream channels with vegetated banks. USA: US Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • CWRC, 2015. Analysis of channel degradation in the reach downstream of the Three Gorges Dam. Scientific Report. Wuhan: Changjiang Water Resources Commission. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby S E, 1999. Effect of riparian vegetation on flow resistance and flood potential. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 125(5): 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day J W, Cable J E, Lane R R et al., 2016. Sediment deposition at the Caernarvon crevasse during the great Mississippi flood of 1927: implications for coastal restoration. Water, 8(2): 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De St Venant B, 1871. Theorie du mouvement non-permanent des eaux avec application aux crues des rivers et a l’introduntion des Marees dans leur lit. Academic de Sci. Comptes Redus, 73(99): 148–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein H A, Barbarossa N L, 1952. River channel roughness. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 117(1): 1121–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang H W, Han D, He G J et al., 2012. Flood management selections for the Yangtze River midstream after the Three Gorges Project operation. Journal of Hydrology, 432/433: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf W L, 2006. Downstream hydrologic and geomorphic effects of large dams on American rivers. Geomorphology, 79(3): 336–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene S L, Knox J C, 2014. Coupling legacy geomorphic surface facies to riparian vegetation: Assessing red cedar invasion along the Missouri River downstream of Gavins Point dam, South Dakota. Geomorphology, 204: 277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han J Q, Sun Z H, Li Y T et al., 2017. Combined effects of multiple large-scale hydraulic engineering on water stages in the middle Yangtze River. Geomorphology, 298: 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Z, Sun Z, Li Y et al., 2021. Response of the gravel-sand transition in the Yangtze River to hydrological and sediment regime changes after upstream damming. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 47(2): 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C A, Zhao X D, Gong M F, 2004. Comparisons of flow resistance equations in movable bed. Journal of Sediment Research, (5): 1–7.

  • IAHR Working Group on Wave Generation and Analysis, 1989. List of sea-state parameters. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 115(6): 793–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Cheng H, Zhou Q et al., 2021. Influence of major water conservation projects on river channels and shorelines in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(10): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julien P Y, Klaassen G J, Ten Brinke W B M et al., 2002. Case study: Bed resistance of Rhine River during 1998 flood. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 128(12): 1042–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Chai Y, Zhu B et al., 2021. River regulation and resilience: An approach for the Yangtze watershed. Water Supply, 21(4): 1817–1833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Xia J Q, Zhou M R et al., 2020. Formula of movable bed roughness for the Middle Yangtze River. Advances in Water Science, 31(4): 535–546. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyu Y, Fagherazzi S, Zheng S et al., 2020. Enhanced hysteresis of suspended sediment transport in response to upstream damming: An example of the middle Yangtze River downstream of the Three Gorges Dam. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 45(8): 1846–1859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu Y W, Zheng S, Tan G M et al., 2019. Morphodynamic adjustments in the Yichang—Chenglingji Reach of the Middle Yangtze River since the operation of the Three Gorges Project. Catena, 172: 274–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myneni R B, Hall F G, Sellers P J et al., 1995. The interpretation of spectral vegetation indexes. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33(2): 481–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makaske B, Maathuis B H P, Padovani C R et al., 2012. Upstream and downstream controls of recent avulsions on the Taquari Megafan, Pantanal, south-western Brazil. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37(12): 1313–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moshe L B, Haviv I, Enzel Y et al., 2008. Incision of alluvial channels in response to a continuous base level fall: Field characterization, modeling, and validation along the Dead Sea. Geomorphology, 93(3/4): 524–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naden P, Rameshwaran P, Mountford O et al., 2006. The influence of macrophyte growth, typical of eutrophic conditions, on river flow velocities and turbulence production. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal, 20(18): 3915–3938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikuradse J, 1933. Stromungsgesetze in rauhen Rohren. VDI-Forschungsheft, 361: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare M T, McGahey C, Bissett N et al., 2010. Variability in roughness measurements for vegetated rivers near base flow, in England and Scotland. Journal of Hydrology, 385(1-4): 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson A W, Peterson A E, 1988. Mobile boundary flow: an assessment of velocity and sediment discharge relationships. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 15(4): 539–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petryk S, Bosmajian III G, 1975. Analysis of flow through vegetation. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 101(7): 871–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Vik J O, Mysterud A et al., 2005. Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9): 503–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts G E, Gurnell A M, 2005. Dams and geomorphology: Research progress and future directions. Geomorphology, 71(1): 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinter N, Heine R A, 2005. Hydrodynamic and morphodynamic response to river engineering documented by fixed-discharge analysis, Lower Missouri River, USA. Journal of Hydrology, 302(1-4): 70–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater L J, 2016. To what extent have changes in channel capacity contributed to flood hazard trends in England and Wales?. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 41(8): 1115–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnad J R, Goudar C T, 2006. Turbulent flow friction factor calculation using a mathematically exact alternative to the Colebrook—White equation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 132(8): 863–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surian N, Rinaldi M, 2003. Morphological response to river engineering and management in alluvial channels in Italy. Geomorphology, 50(4): 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijn L C, 1982. Equivalent roughness of alluvial bed. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 108(10): 1215–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijn L C, 1984. Sediment transport, part III: bed forms and alluvial roughness. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 110(12): 1733–1754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Xu Y J, 2018. Dynamics of 30 large channel bars in the Lower Mississippi River in response to river engineering from 1985 to 2015. Geomorphology, 300: 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Chen Z Y, Shi Y F et al., 2007. The fluvial bedform and hydrodynamic controls along the middle and lower Yangtze River (from Wuhan to estuary). Science in China (Series D): Earth Science, 37: 1223–1234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu B, Wang G, Xia J et al., 2008. Response of bankfull discharge to discharge and sediment load in the Lower Yellow River. Geomorphology, 100(3/4): 366–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia J, Deng S, Lu J et al., 2016. Dynamic channel adjustments in the Jingjiang Reach of the Middle Yangtze River. Scientific Reports, 6(1): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia J, Wu B, Wang G et al., 2010. Estimation of bankfull discharge in the Lower Yellow River using different approaches. Geomorphology, 117(1/2): 66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia J, Zhou M, Lin F et al., 2017. Variation in reach-scale bankfull discharge of the Jingjiang Reach undergoing upstream and downstream boundary controls. Journal of Hydrology, 547: 534–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao M, Udall B, Lettenmaier D P, 2018. On the causes of declining Colorado River streamflows. Water Resources Research, 54(9): 6739–6756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan T, Yang Y, Li Y et al., 2019. Possibilities and challenges of expanding dimensions of waterway downstream of Three Gorges Dam. Water Science and Engineering, 12(2): 136–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Liu W, Zhang J et al., 2022. Changes of divergence and confluence relationship between Dongting Lake and the Yangtze River after the operation of the Three Gorges Project and its impact on the waterway depth. Frontiers in Earth Science, 84.

  • Yang Y, Zheng J, Zhang M et al., 2021. Sandy riverbed shoal under anthropogenic activities: The sandy reach of the Yangtze River, China. Journal of Hydrology, 603: 126861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y P, Zhang M J, Sun Z H et al., 2017a. The relationship between water level change and river channel geometry adjustment in the downstream of the Three Gorges Dam (TGD). Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(5): 776–789. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y P, Zhang M J, Zhu L L et al., 2017b. Influence of large reservoir operation on water-levels and flows in reaches below dam: Case study of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Scientific Reports, 7(1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen B C, 2002. Open channel flow resistance. Journal of hydraulic engineering, 128(1): 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Gao Y, Xu Q X et al., 2018. Changes in dominant discharge and their influential factors in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River after the Three Gorges Dam impoundment. Advances in Water Science, 29(3): 331–338. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Wu M Q, Li S X et al., 2020. Mechanism of adjustment of scouring and silting of Chenglingji-Jiujiang reach in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River after impoundment of the Three Gorges Dam. Advances in Water Science, 31(2): 162–171. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng S, 2016. Reflections on the Three Gorges Project since its operation. Engineering, 2(4): 389–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y J, Lu J Y, Chen L et al., 2018. Bed roughness adjustments determined from fractal measurements of river-bed morphology. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 30(5): 882–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yitian Li.

Additional information

Foundation

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.51779185; National Key Research and Development Program of China, No.2018YFC0407201

Author

Hu Yong (1996—), PhD Candidate

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, Y., Deng, J., Li, Y. et al. Flow resistance adjustments of channel and bars in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River in response to the operation of the Three Gorges Dam. J. Geogr. Sci. 32, 2013–2035 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-2034-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-2034-1

Keywords

Navigation