Skip to main content
Log in

A review of the ecohydrology discipline: Progress, challenges, and future directions in China

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent decades, the ecohydrology discipline was developed to provide theoretical and technical foundations for the protection and restoration of complex ecological systems (e.g., mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, and lakes), and to further ecological civilization construction and green development in China. In this study, the progress and challenges of the ecohydrology discipline are elaborated, and the future development directions are proposed according to international scientific frontiers and national ecological civilization construction demands. Overall, the main discipline directions are to develop new ecohydrological monitoring methods, to comprehensively understand ecohydrological mechanisms and their basic theories, to promote integration of multi-scale and multi-variable models by considering both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, and to encourage multidisciplinary integration, particularly with the social sciences. Furthermore, the future research interests in China include: combining multi-source information, constructing comprehensive monitoring systems, studying spatiotemporal patterns of key ecohydrological variables and their variation characteristics, developing integrated models of ecological, hydrological, and economic processes, estimating their uncertainty; and conducting interdisciplinary studies that include the natural and social sciences. The application prospects in China are further explored for a variety of ecosystems, including forests, grasslands, rivers, lakes, wetlands, farmlands, and cities. This study will provide a reference to support the development of the ecohydrology discipline in China, and will provide a solid theoretical and technical foundation for the implementation of national ecological civilization construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acreman M C, 2001. Hydro-ecology: Linking hydrology and aquatic ecology. Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird A J, Wilby R L, 1999. Eco-hydrology: Plants and Water in Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco-Gutierrez I, Varela-Ortega C, Purkey D R, 2013. Integrated assessment of policy interventions for promoting sustainable irrigation in semi-arid environments: A hydro-economic modeling approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 128(6): 144–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bragg O M, Brown J M B, Ingram H A P, 1991. Modelling the ecohydrological consequences of peat extraction from a Scottish raised mire. In: Hydrological Basis of Ecologically Sound Management of Soil and Ground-water. Edinburgh: IAHS Publication, (202): 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q W, Chen D, Li R N et al., 2013. Adapting the operation of two cascaded reservoirs for ecological flow requirement of a de-watered river channel due to diversion-type hydropower stations. Ecological Modelling, 252: 266–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng G D, Xiao H L, Fu B J et al., 2014. Advances in synthetic research on the eco-hydrological process of the Heihe River Basin. Advances in Earth Science, 29(4): 431–437. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong Z R, Sun D Y, Zhao J Y et al., 2010. Holistic conceptual model for the structure and function of river ecosystems. Advances in Water Science, 21(4): 550–559. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleson P S, 1978. Climate, soil and vegetation: 1. Introduction to water balance dynamics. Water Resources Research, 14(5): 705–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleson P S, 2002. Ecohydrology: Darwinian Expression of Vegetation Form and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feng X M, Fu B J, Piao S L et al., 2016. Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits. Nature Climate Change, 6(11): 1019–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Yu G R, 2018. Biogeochemical cycle and its hydrological coupling processes and associative controlling mechanism in a watershed. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(7): 1381–1393. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieske J M J, Runhaar J, Rolf H L M, 1995. A method for quantifying the effects of groundwater shortages on aquatic and wet ecosystems. Water Science and Technology, 31(8): 363–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith G R, 2013. Changing directions: The atmosphere-plant-soil continuum. New Phytologist, 199(1): 4–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heathwaite A L, Göttlich K, 1993. Mires: Process, Exploitation and Conservation. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 417–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensel B R, Panno S V, Cartwright K et al., 1991. Ecohydrology of a pristine fen. In: Geological Society of America. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. San Diego, CA, USA, A324–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hino M, 1977. Eco-hydraulics, an attempt. Tech. Report no.22, Department of Civil Engineering. Tokyo Institute of Hydorlogy, 29–59.

  • Ingram H A P, 1987. Ecohydrology of Scottish peatlands. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 78(4): 287–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S Z, 1993. Distribution of hydraulic resistance in soil-plant-atmosphere continuum. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 13(2): 157–163. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang S Z, Huo Z L, Li W H, 2016. High-efficient water use and eco-environmental impacts in agriculture in arid regions: Advance and future strategies. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 3: 208–212. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C M, 1997. Study on interface processes of water cycle in soil-plant-atmosphere continuum. Acta Geographica Sinica, 52(4): 366–373. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C M, Zhang Y Y, Wang Z G et al., 2016. The LID pattern for maintaining virtuous water cycle in urbanized area: A preliminary study of planning and techniques for sponge city. Journal of Natural Resources, 31(5): 719–731. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay D S, Band L E, 1997. Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: Dynamic coupling of distributed hydrology and canopy growth. Hydrological Processes, 11: 1197–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo X G, Liu S X, 2001. Simulating evapotranspiration and photosynthesis of winter wheat over the growing season. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 109(3): 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montaldo N, Corona R, John D A, 2013. On the separate effects of soil and land cover on Mediterranean ecohydrology: Two contrasting case studies in Sardinia, Italy. Water Resources Research, 49(2): 1123–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H, Xiao Y et al., 2016. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science, 352: 1455–1459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pataki D E, Boone C G, Hogue T S et al., 2011. Socio-ecohydrology and the urban water challenge. Ecohydrology, 4(2): 341–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroli B, 1990. Ecohydrological parameters indicating different types of shallow groundwater. Journal of Hydrology, 120(1–4): 381–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff N L, Allan J D, Bain M B, 1997. The nature flow regime: A paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience, 47: 769–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff N L, Zimmerman J K, 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: A literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology, 55: 194–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard B, Kavetski D, Kuczera G et al., 2010. Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors. Water Resources Research, 46: W05521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao M A, Yang W Z, Li Y S, 1986. Hydraulic resistances and their relative importance in soil-plant-atmosphere continuum (SPAC). Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, (9): 10–16. (in Chinese)

  • Van der Tol C, Dolman A J, Waterloo M J et al., 2008. Optimum vegetation characteristics, assimilation, and transpiration during a dry season: 2. Model evaluation. Water Resources Research, 44(3): 258–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigiak O, Lutz S, Mentzafou A et al., 2018. Uncertainty of modelled flow regime for flow-ecological assessment in Southern Europe. Science of the Total Environment, 615: 1028–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G X, Qian J, Cheng G D, 2001. Current situation and prospect of the ecological hydrology. Advances in Earth Science, 16(3): 314–323. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J N, Dong Z R, Liao W G et al., 2013. An environmental flow assessment method based on the relationships between flow and ecological response: A case study of the Three Gorges Reservoir and its downstream reach. Science China: Technological Sciences, 43(6): 715–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Fu B J, Piao S L et al., 2015. Reduced sediment transport in the Yellow River due to anthropogenic changes. Nature Geoscience, 9(1): 38–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward J V, Stanford J A, 1983. The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystem. In: Fontaine T D, Bartell S M (eds.). Dynamics of Lotic Ecosystems. Michigan: Ann Arbor Science, 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassen M J, Grootjans A P, 1996. Ecohydrology: An interdisciplinary approach for wetland management and restoration. Vegetatio, 126: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood P J, Hannah D M, Sadler J P, 2008. Hydroecology and Ecohydrology: Past, Present and Future. USA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xia J, Shi W, Luo X P et al., 2015. Revisions on water resources vulnerability and adaption measures under climate change. Advances in Water Science, 26(2): 279–286. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia J, Zhang X, Wei F L et al., 2018. Water system theory and its practices in China. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 16(1): 1–7, 13. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia J, Zhang Y Y, Xiong L H et al., 2017. Opportunities and challenges of the sponge city construction related to urban water issues in China. Science China: Earth Sciences, 60(4): 652–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X B, Tan Y, Yang G S, 2013. Environmental impact assessments of the Three Gorges Project in China: Issues and interventions. Earth-Science Reviews, 124(9): 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang D W, Cong Z T, Shang S H et al., 2016. Research advances from soil water dynamics to ecohydrology. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 47(3): 390–397. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu G R, Zhang L M, Sun X M, 2014. Progresses and prospects of Chinese terrestrial ecosystem flux observation and research network (ChinaFLUX). Progress in Geography, 33(7): 903–917. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Q, Xu S, Wang J et al., 2007. Influence of leaf water potential on diurnal changes in CO2 and water vapour fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 124(2): 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski M, Janauer G A, Jolankai G, 1997. Ecohydrology: A new paradigm for the sustainable use of aquatic resources. UNESCO IHP Technical Document in Hydrology No.7.IHP-V Projects 2.3/2.4. UNESCO Paris, 60(5): 823–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai X Y, Xia J, Zhang Y Y, 2014. Water quality variation in the highly disturbed Huai River Basin, China from 1994 to 2005 by multi-statistical analyses. Science of the Total Environment, 496: 594–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G X, Zhang L, Feng X Q et al., 2014. Wetland Ecohydrology and Water Resources Management. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y Y, Arthington A H, Bunn S E et al., 2012. Classification of flow regimes for environmental flow assessment in regulated rivers: The Huai River Basin, China. River Research and Applications, 28: 989–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y Y, Hou J J, Ma G X et al., 2021. Regional differences of water regulation services of terrestrial ecosystem in the Tibetan Plateau: Insights from multiple land covers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 283: 125216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y Y, Shao Q X, 2018. Uncertainty and its propagation estimation for an integrated water system model: An experiment from water quantity to quality simulations. Journal of Hydrology, 565: 623–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y Y, Shao Q X, Taylor J A, 2016. A balanced calibration of water quantity and quality by multi-objective optimization for integrated water system model. Journal of Hydrology, 538: 802–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y Y, Zhai X Y, Shao Q X et al., 2015. Assessing temporal and spatial alterations of flow regimes in the regulated Huai River Basin, China. Journal of Hydrology, 529: 384–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou G Y, Wei X H, Chen X Z et al., 2015. Global pattern for the effect of climate and land cover on water yield. Nature Communications, 6(3): 5918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu G W, Qin B Q, Zhang Y L et al., 2018. Variation and driving factors of nutrients and chlorophyll-a concentrations in northern region of Lake Taihu, China, 2005–2007. Journal of Lake Sciences, 30(2): 279–295. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zolezzi G, Bellin A, Bruno M C et al., 2009. Assessing hydrological alterations at multiple temporal scales: Adige River, Italy. Water Resources Research, 45: W12421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This paper is one of the achievements of the developmental strategies of the discipline of the academic divisions of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Thanks to the team members, including Cai Qinghua, Chang Jianbo, Chen Qiuwen, Cui Baoshan, Liu Min, Lu Hongwei, Mo Xingguo, Qin Boqiang, Qin Huapeng, Qiu Guoyu, Shen Yanjun, Song Jinxi, Wang Genxu, Wang Yanhui, Wei Xiaohua, Xu Xianli, Yu Pengtao, Zhang Mingfang, Zhang Xiang, Zhang Guangxin, Zhao Changsen, Zhou Guoyi, Zhu Guangwei (Alphabetically listed according to the surname) and reviewers for their valuable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongyong Zhang.

Additional information

Foundation

The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.XDA23040301; The Developmental Strategies of the Discipline of the Academic Divisions of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.2017DXA; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.42071041

Author

Xia Jun (1954-), Academician of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Professor, specialized in hydrology and water resources. E-mail: xiajun666@whu.edu.cn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, J., Zhang, Y., Mu, X. et al. A review of the ecohydrology discipline: Progress, challenges, and future directions in China. J. Geogr. Sci. 31, 1085–1101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1886-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1886-0

Keywords

Navigation