Advertisement

Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 29, Issue 8, pp 1283–1299 | Cite as

Innovation-based urbanization: Evidence from 270 cities at the prefecture level or above in China

  • Lachang LyuEmail author
  • Feixiang Sun
  • Ru Huang
Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

With the rapid development of knowledge economy, a number of important shifts are emerging in urbanization pattern across the world. Traditional urbanization theory has become hard to interpret these changes on a global scale, and “innovation” is a core concept to explain the new changes of the urbanization dynamics. As one of the important contents of urban geography, urbanization dynamic needs to turn from the general population flows between rural and urban areas into emphasizing high skilled migrants flow among cities and regions research. Against this background, we propose a conception of innovation-based urbanization. Using this concept, this study analyzes the spatial distribution characteristics of high skilled migrants and cultural diversity on urban innovation in China, based on the data of the sixth census of 270 cities at the prefecture level or above in China. This study measures the extent to which highly skilled migrants and cultural diversity increase urban innovation, by using spatial Durbin method to construct urban innovation regression model, to support the concept of innovation-based urbanization. The result shows that: first of all, the concept of innovation-based urbanization conforms to the development of knowledge economy, which emphasizes the migration process of highly skilled labor to cities. It helps to promote the changes in urban functions and landscapes and the expansion of urban knowledge activities, which undelines new dynamics of urban development, innovative landscape. Secondly, innovation urbanization based on highly skilled migrants flow is an important driving force for the development of Chinese cities, especially for eastern coastal cities and capital cities. Thirdly, the scale of highly skilled migrants flow and the level of urban cultural diversity in China both have been demonstrated of having positive effect on urban innovation output. With other conditions unchanged, a 10% increase in the number of urban highly skilled migrants and urban cultural diversity will directly result in an increase of 3% and 2% in urban innovation output respectively. This research has deepened our understanding and awareness of the openness and dynamics of the regional innovation system, and it has also provided an important theoretical basis for the formulation of urbanization and urban development policy under knowledge economy.

Keywords

innovation-based urbanization innovation urbanization highly skilled labor migrants cultural diversity China 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asheim B T, Smith H L, Oughton C, 2011. Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7): 875–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biswas R, 2015. Innovation and labour mobility. Journal of Economics, 116(3): 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosetti V, Cattaneo C, Verdolini E, 2015. Migration of skilled workers and innovation: A European perspective. Journal of International Economics, 96(2): 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castells M, Hall P, 1994. Technopoles of the World: The Making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Chen M X, Lu D D, Zhang H, 2009. Comprehensive evaluation and the driving factors of China’s urbanization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 64(4): 387–398. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Cheng Y Q, Wang Z Y, Ma J, 2014. Analyzing the space-time dynamics of innovation in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(12): 1779–1789. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. Cooke P, 2011. Transition regions: Regional-national eco-innovation systems and strategies. Progress in Planning, 76(3): 105–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Datta A, 2015. New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘Entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ding J H, Liu Z Y, Cheng D M et al., 2005. Areal differentiation of inter-provincial migration in China and characteristics of the flow field. Acta Geographica Sinica, 60(1): 106–114. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Elhorst J P, 2014. Spatial Econometrics. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eriksson R H, 2011. Localized spillovers and knowledge flows: How does proximity influence the performance of plants. Economic Geography, 87(2): 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faggian A, Rajbhandari I, Dotzel K R, 2017. The interregional migration of human capital and its regional consequences: A review. Regional Studies, 51(1): 128–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Florida R, 2002. Bohemia and economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 2(1): 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Florida R, Adler P, Mellander C, 2017. The city as innovation machine. Regional Studies, 51(1): 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedmann J, 2006. Four theses in the study of China’s urbanization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(2): 440–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gagliardi L, 2015. Does skilled migration foster innovative performance? Evidence from British local areas. Papers in Regional Science, 94(4): 773–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graversen E K, Friis-Jensen K, 2001. Job mobility implications of the HRST definition: Illustrated by empirical numbers from register data // OECD. Innovative People: Mobility of Skilled Personnel in National Innovation Systems. Paris.Google Scholar
  18. Griliches Z, 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1): 92–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grossman G M, Helpman E, 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gu C L, Wu L Y, 2008. Review on major studies on urbanization in China. Urban Problems, (12): 2–12. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Gu G X, Wang Z, 2014. Agent-based simulation on the evolution and development of regional spatial structure with technology and capital diffusion in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(6): 808–822. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Huang Z S, 2015. Cultural transition and cultural community construction of contemporary urban migrants. Forum on Chinese Culture, 111(7): 68–73. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  23. Jaffe A B, 1989. Real effects of academic research. The American Economic Review, 79(5): 957–970.Google Scholar
  24. Krugman P, 1979. A model of innovation, technology transfer, and the world distribution of income. Journal of Political Economy, 87(2): 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee N, 2014. Migrant and ethnic diversity, cities and innovation: Firm effects or city effects. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4): 769–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. LeSage J P, Pace R K, 2009. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. New York: Taylor & Francis-CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li J J, Miao C H, 2017. Impact of population flow on regional economic disparities in the Yangtze River economic belt. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(2): 197–212. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Li Z H, Wang N, Ma Q, 2013. Knowledge spillovers analysis on interregional innovative behaviors based on spatial measurement. Science Research Management, 34(6): 9–16. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Lyu L C, 2017. The Geography of Innovation. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  30. Lyu L C, Li Y, 2010. A research on Chinese renovation urban system based on urban renovation function. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(2): 177–190. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  31. Ma H T, 2017. Triangle model of Chinese returnees: A tentative method for city networks based on talent flows. Geographical Research, 36(1): 161–170. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  32. Miguélez E, Moreno R, 2013. Skilled labour mobility, networks and knowledge creation in regions: A panel data approach. The Annals of Regional Science, 51(1): 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Niebuhr A, 2010. Migration and innovation: Does cultural diversity matter for regional R&D activity. Papers in Regional Science, 89(3): 563–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ning Yuemin, 2011. Definition of Chinese metropolitan areas and large urban agglomerations: Role of large urban agglomerations in regional development. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 31(3): 257–263. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  35. Pacione M, 2001. Urban Geography: A Global Perspective. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pu Y X, Han H L, Ge Y et al., 2016. Multilateral mechanism analysis of interprovincial migration flows in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 71(2): 205–216. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. Qu A X, Meng Z Y, 2014. Study on spatial-temporal pattern of cultural diversity and its affected factors in China. Human Geography, 29(6): 53–59. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  38. Romer P M, 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rossi U, Di Bella A, 2017. Start-up urbanism: New York, Rio de Janeiro and the global urbanization of technology-based economies. Environment and Planning A, 49(5): 999–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saxenian A L, 2005. From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2): 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saxenian A L, 2006. The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Schoenberger E, Walker R A, 2016. Beyond exchange and agglomeration: Resource flows and city environments as wellsprings of urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(5): 935–958.Google Scholar
  43. Scott A J, 2008. Social Economy of the Metropolis: Cognitive-cultural Capitalism and the Global Resurgence of Cities. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scott A J, 2014. Beyond the creative city: Cognitive-cultural capitalism and the new urbanism. Regional Studies, 48(4): 565–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shearmur R, 2012. Are cities the font of innovation? A critical review of the literature on cities and innovation. Cities, 29: 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shen Y M, Liu K, Qiu L, 2015. Characteristics of services development of core cities in urban agglomerations of China. Progress in Geography, 34(8): 957–965. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Siemiatycki E, 2013. A smooth ride? From industrial to creative urbanism in Oshawa, Ontario. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5): 1766–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sternberg R, Müller C, 2005. Return migration in regional innovation systems. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 13(2): 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sternberg R, Müller C, 2010. “New Argonauts” in China: Return migrants, transnational entrepreneurship and economic growth in a regional innovation system. Die Erde, 144(1/2): 103–125.Google Scholar
  50. Storper M, Scott A J, 2009. Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2): 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Trippl M, 2010. Developing cross-border regional innovation systems: Key factors and challenges. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 101(2): 150–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Trippl M, Maier G, 2010. Knowledge spillover agents and regional development. Papers in Regional Science, 89(2): 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang C, Sun F X, 2017. Spatial agglomeration and spillover effects of urban innovation in Yangtze River Delta. Geographical Research, 36(6): 1042–1052. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  54. Wang C Y, Qin J, Yang S, 2013. Analysis of the cluster mode of R&D industry in the innovative city districts: Taking Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Chongqing as examples. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68(8): 1097–1109. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  55. Wang Y, Ding Z S, Yu M J et al., 2015. Quantitative analysis of the coordination relation between modern service industry and urbanization based on coupling model: A case study of Changshu. Geographical Research, 34(1): 97–108. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  56. Wu K, Fang C L, Zhao M X et al., 2013. The intercity space of flow influenced by high-speed rail: A case study for the rail transit passenger behavior between Beijing and Tianjin. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68(2): 159–174. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  57. Wu L Y, Gu C L, 2005. Globalization, foreign investment and urbanization in developing countries: A case study of Jiangsu. City Planning Review, 29(7): 28–33. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  58. Wu Y M, 2006. A spatial econometric model and its application to research & development and regional innovation. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 23(5): 74–85. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  59. Xu N, Lyu L C, Huang Ru et al., 2016. Migration and innovation of cities in China. Areal Research & Development, 35(2): 165–169. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  60. Yang C K, Ning Y M, 2015. Evolution of spatial pattern of inter-provincial migration and its impacts on urbanization in China. Geographical Research, 34(8): 1492–1506. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  61. Yu W Y, 2012. The motive power mechanism of China urbanization: A research base on culture motive power. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 32(11): 1335–1339. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  62. Zhang H Y, 2010. Reflection and reconstruction of urbanization theory in China. Urban Problems, (12): 2–8. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press Springer-Verlag 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of ManagementCapital Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.College of Resource Environment and TourismCapital Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Beijing Urban Innovation and Development Research CenterBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations