Skip to main content
Log in

Spatiotemporal heterogeneity and influencing mechanism of ecosystem services in the Pearl River Delta from the perspective of LUCC

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land use/land cover change (LUCC) has considerable impact on ecosystem services. It is essential to quantify the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of ecosystem services from the perspective of LUCC, which will benefit regional land management and ecological protection. We analyzed land use change in the Pearl River Delta from 2000 to 2015, and we used a spatially explicit integrated modeling tool (InVEST) for quantification of ecosystem services–water yield, carbon storage, soil retention, and food supply. The results revealed increases in the areas of grassland and built-up land, and decreases in the areas of woodland, cropland, water body, and unused land during 2000 to 2015, which have caused increase in water yield and carbon storage, while decrease in soil retention and food supply. The dynamic changes of woodland, grassland, cropland, and built-up land were the main driving factors in the relationship of trade-offs and synergies among the four ecosystem services, which are ubiquitous. Those all illustrate the importance of considering ecosystem services in decision making related to land use and land management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braat L C, Brink P T, Klok T C, 2008. Cost of Policy Inaction-COPI: The Case of Not Meeting the 2010 Biodiversity Target. Alterra: EU/IEEE Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budyko M I, 1974. Climate and Life. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butsic V, Shapero M, Moanga D et al., 2017. Using InVEST to assess ecosystem services on conserved properties in Sonoma County, CA. California Agriculture, 71(2): 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, Groot R D et al., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily G C, 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington D C: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sabatino A, Coscieme L, Vignini P et al., 2013. Scale and ecological dependence of ecosystem services evaluation: Spatial extension and economic value of freshwater ecosystems in Italy. Ecological Indicators, 32(9): 259–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droogers P, Allen R G, 2002. Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate data conditions. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 16(1): 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B J, Wang S, Liu Y et al., 2016. Hydrogeomorphic ecosystem responses to natural and anthropogenic changes in the Loess Plateau of China. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 45(1): 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B J, Zhang L W, 2014. Land-use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress. Progress in Geography, 33(4): 441–446. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu B J, Zhou G Y, Bai Y F et al., 2009. The main terrestrial ecosystem services and ecological security in China. Advances in Earth Science, 24(6): 571–576. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan H H, Wu S H, Fan X D, 2003. Reserves and spatial distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon in Guangdong Province. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 14(9): 1499–1502. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S C, Zhang C Y, Liu J L et al., 2013. The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography. Geographical Research, 32(8): 1379–1390. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X B, Fan R X, Liu X D, 2014. Advance in studies on carbon storage and carbon process in grassland ecosystem of China. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 23(11): 1845–1851. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y F, Luo C Y, Liu G et al., 2013. Effects of land use change on ecosystem services: A case study in Miyun reservoir watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(3): 726–736. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z J, Liu Y S, Baig M H A, 2018a. Biophysical effect of conversion from croplands to grasslands in water-limited temperate regions of China. Science of the Total Environment, 648: 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z J, Liu Y S, Li Y R, 2018b. Extended warm temperate zone and opportunities for cropping system change in the Loess Plateau of China. International Journal of Climatology, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leh M D K, Matlock M D, Cummings E C et al., 2013. Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 165: 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends. Washington D C: Island Press.

  • Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H W, Xiao Y et al., 2016. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science, 352(6292): 1455–1459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Hu X X, Zhao M Y et al., 2017. Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs: From cognition to decision-making. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(6): 960–973. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl River Water Resources Commission (PRWRC), 2007. Soil and water loss in the Pearl River, viewed 09/03/2011. http://www.pearlwater.gov.cn/zjstbc/lsgk/201103/t20110309_40944.htm.

  • Qian C Y, Gong J, Zhang J X et al., 2018. Change and tradeoffs-synergies analysis on watershed ecosystem services: A case study of Bailongjiang Watershed, Gansu. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(5): 868–879. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A et al., 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook No.703. USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez J P, Beard Jr T D, Bennett E M et al., 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 11(1): 709–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roose E, 1996. Land husbandry: Components and strategy. FAO Soils Bulletin. 70, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley A N, Williams J R, 1990. EPIC: The erosion-productivity impact calculator: 2. User manual. Technical Bulletin-United States Department of Agriculture, 4(4): 206–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallis H T, Ricketts T, Guerry A D et al., 2011. InVEST 2.1 beta User’s Guide. Stanford: The Natural Capital Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Zhu W P, Zhang H et al., 2015. A review on principle and application of the InVEST model. Ecological Science, 34(3): 204–208. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal-Legaz B, Martínez-Fernández J, Picón A S et al., 2013. Trade-offs between maintenance of ecosystem services and socio-economic development in rural mountainous communities in southern Spain: A dynamic simulation approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 131(1): 280–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W Z, Jiao J Y, He X P et al., 1995. Study on rainfall erosivity in China. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, (4): 7–18. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Resources Department of Guangdong Province, 2016. Guangdong Province Water Resources Bulletin 2015, Nan Fang Daily, 12/08/2016(A05). (in Chinese)

  • Wei Z Q, Wu S H, Zhou S L et al., 2014. Soil organic carbon transformation and related properties in urban soil under impervious surfaces. Pedosphere, 24(1): 56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu P J, Liu X P, Li X et al., 2016. Impact of urban expansion on carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems based on InVEST model and CA: A case study of Guangdong Province, China. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 32(5): 22–28, 36, 2. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu R S, Guan D S, 2006. Spatio-temporal variation of population and its influence on the resources and environment in Pearl River Delta. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 25(12): 1586–1590. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu W H, Peng J, Liu Y X et al., 2017. Tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services in Ordos City. Progress in Geography, 36(12): 1571–1581. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Q Y, Huang M, Liu H S et al., 2011. Integrated assessment of eco-environmental vulnerability in Pearl River Delta based on RS and GIS. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 22(11): 2987–2995. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang D Y, 2011. Pearl River Delta economic zone ecological environment problems and countermeasures. Urban Studies, 18(8): 59–63. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye C S, Feng Y F, 2013. Ecological risk assessment for Pearl River Delta based on land use change. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 29(19): 224–232+294. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X Y, Xu Z C, Zeng F T et al., 2011. Carbon density distribution and storage dynamics of forest ecosystem in Pearl River Delta of low subtropical. China Environmental Science, 31(Suppl.1): 69–77. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou C S, Dai D D, 2015. Transition of urbanization in the Pearl River Delta. Tropical Geography, 35(3): 343–353. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meizhen Lin.

Additional information

Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41771097, No.41671175

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, R., Lin, M., Gong, J. et al. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity and influencing mechanism of ecosystem services in the Pearl River Delta from the perspective of LUCC. J. Geogr. Sci. 29, 831–845 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1631-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1631-0

Keywords

Navigation