Skip to main content
Log in

Spatiotemporal features of farmland scaling and the mechanisms that underlie these changes within the Three Gorges Reservoir Area

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Discussions regarding the functional transformation of agricultural utilization and the mechanisms that underlie these changes within the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA) reflect variations in the relationship between people and their environment in China’s central and westerns part, an area of mountains and reservoirs. A clear understanding of these changes also provides the scientific basis for the development of multi-functional agriculture in typical mountainous areas. Five counties were selected for analysis in this study from the hinterland of the TGRA; we analyzed changes in farmland scaling and corresponding underlying mechanisms by defining the concepts of “Scaling Farmland” (SF) and by using the software packages ArcGIS10.2, SPSS, and Geographical Detectors. The results of this analysis show that sources of increased SF have mainly comprised cultivated and shrub land. Indeed, with the exception of some alpine off-season vegetables, SF growth has mainly occurred in low altitude areas and in places where the slope is less than 30°. We also show that spatial changes in various SF types have also been substantially different, but in all cases are closely related to road and township administrative centers. Natural factors at the patch level, including elevation and slope, have contributed significantly to SF, while at the township level, underlying socioeconomic and humanistic factors have tended to include road traffic and agricultural population density. In contrast, at the regional level, underlying driving forces within each have tended to be more significant than overall study area scale. We show that while changes in, and the development of, SF have been driven by numerous factors, agricultural policies have always been amongst the most important. The results clearly elucidate general land use transformation patterns within the mountain regions of western China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abro Z A, Alemu B A, Hanjra M A, 2014. Policies for agricultural productivity growth and poverty reduction in rural Ethiopia. World Development, 59(3): 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amjath-Babu T S, Kaechele H, 2015. Agricultural system transitions in selected Indian states: What do the related indicators say about the underlying biodiversity changes and economic trade-offs? Ecological Indicators, 57: 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini F, Viaggi D, 2013. The common agricultural policy and the determinants of changes in EU farm size. Land Use Policy, 31(2): 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai S Q, Wu B W, Wu S D et al., 2015. Priority research of hilly land consolidation based on land fragmentation and location condition: A case study of Songxi county, Fujian province. Journal of Guizhou Normal University (Natural Sciences), 33(4): 14–20. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannenberg P, Kuemmerle T, 2010. Farm size and land use pattern changes in postsocialist Poland. Professional Geographer, 62(2): 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defries R S, Asner G P, Houghton R A, 2004. Trade-offs in land-use decisions: Towards a framework for assessing multiple ecosystem responses to land-use change. Geophysical Monograph, 153: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll J C, Kraay A C, 1998. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4): 549–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong X J, Tang H J, 2015. A review on the scale operation of farmland worldwide. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 36(3): 62–71. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley J A, Defries R, Asner G P et al., 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734): 570–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grashof-Bokdam C J, Cormont A, Polman N B P et al., 2016. Modelling shifts between mono-and multifunctional farming systems: The importance of social and economic drivers. Landscape Ecology, 32(3): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo B, Jin X, Yang X et al., 2015. Determining the effects of land consolidation on the multifunctionlity of the cropland production system in China using a SPA-fuzzy assessment model. European Journal of Agronomy, 63: 12–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herdt R W, Mandac A M, 1981. Modern technology and economic efficiency of Philippine rice farmers. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 29(2): 375–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ̐lkay U G, Štefan B, 2015. Farm size and participation in agri-environmental measures: Farm-level evidence from Slovenia. Land Use Policy, 46: 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayne T S, Chamberlin J, Traub L et al., 2011. Africa’s changing farm size distribution patterns: The rise of medium-scale farms. Agricultural Economics, 47(Suppl.1): 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P, 2011. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of sciences of the United States of America, 108: 3465–3472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J Y, Kuang W H, Zhang Z X et al., 2014. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns and causes of land use changes in China since the late 1980s. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24(2): 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Song W, Deng X, 2016. Changes in crop type distribution in Zhangye City of the Heihe River Basin, China. Applied Geography, 76: 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y S, Fang C L, 2001. A study on regional forced land use conversion and optimal allocation: Taking the Three Gorges Reservoir Area as an example. Journal of Natural Resources, 16(4): 334–340. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Long H L, Liu Y S, Li X B et al., 2010. Building new countryside in China: A geographical perspective. Land Use Policy, 27(2): 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Q H, Fu B J, Yang L Z, 2010. Effects of land use on soil erosion and nutrient loss in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. Soil Use & Management, 17(4): 288–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran W, 1997. Farm size change in New Zealand. New Zealand Geographer, 53(1): 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niroula G S, Thapa G B, 2005. Impacts and causes of land fragmentation, and lessons learned from land consolidation in South Asia. Land Use Policy, 22(4): 358–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit M, Weiss C, Heckelei T et al., 2011. Success in agricultural transformation: What it means and what makes it happen. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 39(5): 882–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rgjr P, Schneider L C, 2001. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 85(1): 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao J A, Dang Y F, Wang W et al., 2018. Simulation of future land-use scenarios in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region under the effects of multiple factors. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(12): 1907–1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su S, Zhou X, Wan C et al., 2016. Land use changes to cash crop plantations: Crop types, multilevel determinants and policy implications. Land Use Policy, 50: 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan M, Robinson G M, Li X et al., 2013. Spatial and temporal variability of farm size in China in context of rapid urbanization. Chinese Geographical Science, 23(5): 607–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang J Y, Zeng F S, 2014. The proper scale management of farmland: Types, performance and revelation: A case study of Hunan Province. Economic Geography, 34(5): 134–138. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Chen K Z, Gupta S D et al., 2015. Is small still beautiful? A comparative study of rice farm size and productivity in China and India. China Agricultural Economic Review, 7(3): 484–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J F, Hu Y, 2012. Environmental health risk detection with GeogDetector. Environmental Modelling & Software, 33(10): 114–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J F, Li X H, Christakos G et al., 2010. Geographical detectors-based health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun region, China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(1): 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J F, Zhang T L, Fu B J, 2016. A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity. Ecological Indicators, 67: 250–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu G P, Zeng Y N, Xiao P F et al., 2010. Using autologistic spatial models to simulate the distribution of land-use patterns in Zhangjiajie, Hunan Province. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20(2): 310–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Q, Yin R L, 2010. Literature review on the issues of proper scale management of farmland in China. China Land Science, 24(4): 75–80. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang P, Wang L, Zhang N et al., 2016. Family farms’ scale at home and abroad. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 14: 200–204. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q Y, Xin G X, Shi Y et al., 2009. Study on the scale of rural-land management in Chongqing. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 31(4): 143–147. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • You H, 2017. Agricultural landscape dynamics in response to economic transition: Comparisons between different spatial planning zones in Ningbo region, China. Land Use Policy, 61: 316–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Tu J J, Lu D B et al., 2011. Study on the relationship between population and economic spatial distribution and its dynamic in Chongqing. Economic Geography, 31(11): 1781–1785. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yangbing Li.

Additional information

Foundation: Key Basic Science and Cutting Edge Technology Research Plan of Chongqing, No.cstc2015jcyjBX0128; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41261045; Chongqing Normal University Graduate Student Research Innovation Project, No.YKC18033

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, X., Li, Y. Spatiotemporal features of farmland scaling and the mechanisms that underlie these changes within the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. J. Geogr. Sci. 29, 563–580 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1615-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1615-0

Keywords

Navigation