Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating spatial pattern of hyporheic water exchange in slack water pool

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hyporheic zone (HZ) influences hydraulic and biogeochemical processes in and alongside streams, therefore, investigating the controlling geographic factors is beneficial for understanding the hydrological processes in HZ. Slack water pool (SWP) is an essential micro-topographic structure that has an impact on surface water and groundwater interactions in the HZ during and after high flows. However, only a few studies investigate HZ surface water and groundwater exchange in the SWP. This study used the thermal method to estimate the HZ water exchange in the SWP in a segment of the Weihe River in China during the winter season. The findings show that on the flow-direction parallel to the stream, river recharge dominates the HZ water exchange, while on the opposing flow-direction bank groundwater discharge dominates the water exchange. The water exchange in the opposing flow-direction bank is about 1.6 times of that in the flow-direction bank. The HZ water exchange is not only controlled by flow velocity but also the location and shape of the SWP. Great water exchange amount corresponds to the shape with more deformation. The maximum water exchange within the SWP is close to the river bank where the edge is relatively high. This study provides some guidelines for water resources management during flooding events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anibas C, Buis K, Verhoeven R et al., 2011. A simple thermal mapping method for seasonal spatial patterns of groundwater-surface water interaction. Journal of Hydrology, 397(1): 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anibas C, Fleckenstein J H, Volze N et al., 2009. Transient or steady-state? Using vertical temperature profiles to quantify groundwater-surface water exchange. Hydrological Processes, 23(15): 2165–2177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter C, Hauer F R, Woessner W W, 2003. Measuring groundwater-stream water exchange: New techniques for installing minipiezometers and estimating hydraulic conductivity. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 132(3): 493–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellin A, Tonina D, Marzadri A, 2015. Breakthrough curve moments scaling in hyporheic exchange. Water Resources Research, 51(2): 1112–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boano F, Camporeale C, Revelli R et al., 2006. Sinuosity-driven hyporheic exchange in meandering rivers. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(18): L18406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boano F, Revelli R, Ridolfi L, 2008. Reduction of the hyporheic zone volume due to the stream-aquifer interaction. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(9): L09401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boano F, Revelli R, Ridolfi L, 2010. Effect of streamflow stochasticity on bedform-driven hyporheic exchange. Advances in Water Resources, 33(11): 1367–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton A J, Datry T, Kasahara T et al., 2010. Ecology and management of the hyporheic zone: Stream-groundwater interactions of running waters and their floodplains. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 29(1): 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas M B, Wilson J, Zlotnik V A, 2004. Impact of heterogeneity, bed forms, and stream curvature on subchannel hyporheic exchange. Water Resources Research, 40(8): W08307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso A, Ridolfi L, Boano F, 2016. Impact of watershed topography on hyporheic exchange. Advances in Water Resources, 94: 400–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Dong W, Ou G et al., 2013. Gaining and losing stream reaches have opposite hydraulic conductivity distribution patterns. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(7): 2569–2579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X B, Cardenas M B, Chen L, 2015. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional bed form-induced hyporheic exchange. Water Resources Research, 51(4): 2923–2936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng D H, Chen X H, Huo A D et al., 2013. Influence of bedding orientation on the anisotropy of hydraulic conductivity in a well-sorted fluvial sediment. International Journal of Sediment Research, 28(1): 118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conant B, 2004. Delineating and quantifying ground water discharge zones using streambed temperatures. Groundwater, 42(2): 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conant Jr B, Cherry J A, Gillham R W, 2004. A PCE groundwater plume discharging to a river: Influence of the streambed and near-river zone on contaminant distributions. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 73(1): 249–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darracq A, Destouni G, Persson K et al., 2009. Quantification of advective solute travel times and mass transport through hydrological catchments. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 10(1/2): 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doble R, Brunner P, McCallum J et al., 2012. An analysis of river bank slope and unsaturated flow effects on bank storage. Groundwater, 50(1): 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dochartaigh B, MacDonald A, Archer N et al., 2012. Groundwater-surface water interaction in an upland hillslope- floodplain environment, Eddleston, Scotland, BHS 11th National Symposium, Hydrology for a Changing World, Dundee, Scotland, pp. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley-Southern M, Binley A, 2015. Temporal responses of groundwater-surface water exchange to successive storm events. Water Resources Research, 51(2): 1112–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunster K, 2011. Dictionary of Natural Resource Management. UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer H, Kloep F, Wilzcek S et al., 2005. A river's liver-microbial processes within the hyporheic zone of a large lowland river. Biogeochemistry, 76(2): 349–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox A, Boano F, Arnon S, 2014. Impact of losing and gaining streamflow conditions on hyporheic exchange fluxes induced by dune-shaped bed forms. Water Resources Research, 50(3): 1895–1907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frei S, Lischeid G, Fleckenstein J H, 2010. Effects of micro-topography on surface-subsurface exchange and runoff generation in a virtual riparian wetland: A modeling study. Advances in Water Resources, 33(11): 1388–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerecht K E, Cardenas M B, Guswa A J et al., 2011. Dynamics of hyporheic flow and heat transport across a bed-to-bank continuum in a large regulated river. Water Resources Research, 47: W03524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gualtieri C, Filizola Jr N, Oliveira M et al., 2017. A field study of the confluence between Negro and Solimões rivers. Part 1: Hydrodynamics and sediment transport. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 350(1/2): 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ianniruberto M, Trevethan M, Pinheiro A et al., 2017. A field study of the confluence between Negro and Solimões rivers. Part 2: Bed morphology and stratigraphy. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 350(1/2): 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine D J, Lautz L K, Briggs M A et al., 2015. Experimental evaluation of the applicability of phase, amplitude, and combined methods to determine water flux and thermal diffusivity from temperature time series using VFLUX 2. Journal of Hydrology, 531: 728–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isiorho S A, Meyer J H, 1999. The effects of bag type and meter size on seepage meter measurements. Groundwater, 37(3): 411–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang W, Song J, Zhang J et al., 2015. Spatial variability of streambed vertical hydraulic conductivity and its relation to distinctive stream morphologies in the Beiluo River, Shaanxi Province, China. Hydrogeology Journal, 23(7): 1617–1626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josset L, Ginsbourger D, Lunati I, 2015. Functional error modeling for uncertainty quantification in hydrogeology. Water Resources Research, 51(2): 1050–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbus E, Reinstorf F, Schirmer M, 2006. Measuring methods for groundwater-surface water interactions: A review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10(6): 873–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasahara T, Wondzell S M, 2003. Geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange flow in mountain streams. Water Resources Research, 39(1): SBH 3-1-SBH 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch J, Nowak W, 2015. Predicting DNAPL mass discharge and contaminated site longevity probabilities: Conceptual model and high-resolution stochastic simulation. Water Resources Research, 51: 806–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korbel K L, Hose G C, 2015. Habitat, water quality, seasonality, or site? Identifying environmental correlates of the distribution of groundwater biota. Freshwater Science, 34(1): 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman KL, Malama B, Heath J E, 2015. Multiporosity flow in fractured low-permeability rocks. Water Resources Research, 51(2): 848–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K N, Entekhabi D, Molini A, 2015. Hydrological extremes in hyperarid regions: A diagnostic characterization of intense precipitation over the Central Arabian Peninsula. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120: 1637–1650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin R G, Sharp J M, 1992. On the relationship between river-basin geomorphology, aquifer hydraulics, and ground-water flow direction in alluvial aquifers. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 104(12): 1608–1620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lautz L K, Siegel D I, 2006. Modeling surface and ground water mixing in the hyporheic zone using MODFLOW and MT3D. Advances in Water Resources, 29(11): 1618–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Song J X, Wei A et al., 2013. Changes in major factors affecting the ecosystem health of the Weihe River in Shaanxi Province, China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 7(6): 875–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malard F, Tockner K, Dole-Olivier M J et al., 2002. A landscape perspective of surface-subsurface hydrological exchanges in river corridors. Freshwater Biology, 47(4): 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm I A, Soulsby C, Youngson A F, 2006. High-frequency logging technologies reveal state-dependent hyporheic process dynamics: Implications for hydroecological studies. Hydrological Processes, 20(3): 615–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzadri A, Tonina D, McKean J A et al., 2014. Multi-scale streambed topographic and discharge effects on hyporheic exchange at the stream network scale in confined streams. Journal of Hydrology, 519: 1997–2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Lera C, Datry T, 2017. Relating hydraulic conductivity and hyporheic zone biogeochemical processing to conserve and restore river ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 579: 1815–1821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min L L, Yu J J, Liu C M et al., 2013. The spatial variability of streambed vertical hydraulic conductivity in an intermittent river, northwestern China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 69(3): 873–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman R J, Latterell J J, 2005. Principles for linking fish habitat to fisheries management and conservation. Journal of Fish Biology, 67: 166–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazemi A, Wheater H S, 2014. How can the uncertainty in the natural inflow regime propagate into the assessment of water resource systems? Advances in Water Resources, 63: 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peralta-Maraver I, Reiss J, Robertson A L, 2018. Interplay of hydrology, community ecology and pollutant attenuation in the hyporheic zone. Science of the Total Environment, 610/611: 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozdniakov S P, Wang P, Lekhov M V, 2016. A semi-analytical generalized Hvorslev formula for estimating riverbed hydraulic conductivity with an open-ended standpipe permeameter. Journal of Hydrology, 540: 736–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prancevic J P, Lamb M P, 2015. Particle friction angles in steep mountain channels. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 120(2): 242–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez J A, Baird A J, Coulthard T J et al., 2015. Testing a simple model of gas bubble dynamics in porous media. Water Resources Research, 51(2): 1036–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rau G C, Andersen M S, McCallum A M et al., 2014. Heat as a tracer to quantify water flow in near-surface sediments. Earth-Science Reviews, 129: 40–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivett M O, Buss S R, Morgan P et al., 2008. Nitrate attenuation in groundwater: A review of biogeochemical controlling processes. Water Research, 42(16): 4215–4232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapriza-Azuri G, Jódar J, Navarro V et al., 2015. Impacts of rainfall spatial variability on hydrogeological response. Water Resources Research, 51(2): 1112–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeeckle M W, Nelson J M, Shreve R L, 2007. Forces on stationary particles in near-bed turbulent flows. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112(F2): F02003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt C, Conant Jr B, Bayer-Raich M et al., 2007. Evaluation and field-scale application of an analytical method to quantify groundwater discharge using mapped streambed temperatures. Journal of Hydrology, 347(3): 292–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somogyvári M, Bayer P, Brauchler R, 2016. Travel-time-based thermal tracer tomography. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20(5): 1885–1901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song J X, Zhang G T, Wang W Z et al., 2017. Variability in the vertical hyporheic water exchange effected by hydraulic conductivity and river morphology at a natural confluent meander bend. Hydrological Processes, 31(19): 3407–3420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stegen J C, Johnson T, Fredrickson J K et al., 2018. Influences of organic carbon speciation on hyporheic corridor biogeochemistry and microbial ecology. Nat. Commun., 9(1): 585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey R G, Howard K W F, Williams D D, 2003. Factors controlling riffle-scale hyporheic exchange flows and their seasonal changes in a gaining stream: A three-dimensional groundwater flow model. Water Resources Research, 39(2): 1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbington R, 2012. The hyporheic zone as an invertebrate refuge: A review of variability in space, time, taxa and behaviour. Marine and Freshwater Research, 63(4): 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki S, 1960. Percolation measurements based on heat flow through soil with special reference to paddy fields. Journal of Geophysical Research, 65(9): 2883–2885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonina D, Buffington J M, 2007. Hyporheic exchange in gravel bed rivers with pool-riffle morphology: Laboratory experiments and three-dimensional modeling. Water Resources Research, 43(1): W01421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trauth N, Fleckenstein J H, 2017. Single discharge events increase reactive efficiency of the hyporheic zone. Water Resources Research, 53(1): 779–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt T, Schirmer M, Cirpka O A, 2012. Investigating riparian groundwater flow close to a losing river using diurnal temperature oscillations at high vertical resolution. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(2): 473–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Pozdniakov S P, Vasilevskiy P Y, 2017. Estimating groundwater-ephemeral stream exchange in hyper-arid environments: Field experiments and numerical simulations. Journal of Hydrology, 555: 68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W Z, Song J X, Zhang G T et al., 2018. The influence of hyporheic upwelling fluxes on inorganic nitrogen concentrations in the pore water of the Weihe River. Ecological Engineering, 112: 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhoff M C, Gooseff M N, Bogaard T A et al., 2011. Quantifying hyporheic exchange at high spatial resolution using natural temperature variations along a first-order stream. Water Resources Research, 47(10): W10508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wroblicky G J, Campana M E, Valett H M et al., 1998. Seasonal variation in surface-subsurface water exchange and lateral hyporheic area of two stream-aquifer systems. Water Resources Research, 34(3): 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G T, Song J X, Wen M et al., 2017. Effect of bank curvatures on hyporheic water exchange at meter scale. Hydrology Research, 48(2): 355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Guotao Zhang, Weiwei Jiang, Yuanyuan Wang, Ming Wen, Shaofeng Xu, and other members for assistance in fieldwork. In particular, we are grateful to the editor and two anonymous reviewers for providing numerous comments and suggestions, which helped improve this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinxi Song.

Additional information

Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.51679200; No.51379175; Program for Key Science and Technology Innovation Team in Shaanxi Province, No.2014KCT-27; The Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.A315021406; Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education, No.20136101110001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, J., Cheng, D., Zhang, J. et al. Estimating spatial pattern of hyporheic water exchange in slack water pool. J. Geogr. Sci. 29, 377–388 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1604-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1604-3

Keywords

Navigation