Skip to main content

Spillover effect offsets the conservation effort in the Amazon

Abstract

Diverse conservation efforts have been expanding around the globe, even under the stress of increasing agricultural production. A striking example is the supply-chain agreements put upon the Amazon forest which had reduced deforestation by 80% from the early 2000s (27,772 km2) to 2015 (6207 km2). However, evaluation of these conservation efforts usually focused on the impacts within the Amazon biome only, while the effects that spill over to other areas (e.g., displacement of environmental pressure from one area to another) were rarely considered. Ignoring spillover effects may lead to biased or even wrong conclusions about the effectiveness of these conservation efforts because the hidden cost outside the target area of conservation may offset the achievement within it. It is thus important to assess the spillover effects of these supply-chain agreements. In this study, we used the two supply-chain agreements (i.e., Soy Moratorium and zero-deforestation beef agreement) implemented in the Amazon biome as examples and evaluated their spillover effects to the Cerrado. To achieve a holistic evaluation of the spillover effects, we adopted the telecoupling framework in our analysis. The application of the telecoupling framework includes the interactions between distant systems and extends the analytical boundaries beyond the signatory areas, which fill the gap of previous studies. Our results indicate that the supply-chain agreements have significantly reduced deforestation by half compared to projections within the sending system (i.e., Pará State in the Amazon, which exports soybeans and other agricultural products), but at the cost of increasing deforestation in the spillover system (i.e., a 6.6 time increase in Tocantins State of the Cerrado, where deforestation was affected by interactions between the Amazon and other places). Our study emphasizes that spillover effects should be considered in the evaluation and planning of conservation efforts, for which the telecoupling framework works as a useful tool to do that systematically.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Almeida L B, 2012. Zoneamento Geoambiental do Estado do Tocantins. Rio Claro, Sao Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arima E Y, Richards P, Walker R et al., 2011. Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters, 6(2): 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assunção J, Gandour C, Rocha R, 2015. Deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon: Prices or policies? Pages 1–5 Environment and Development Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastos T X, Pachêco N A, 2005. Freqüências de Chuva no Estado do Pará no Plano Microrregional. Page Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento. Belem, Para.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond W J, Parr C L, 2010. Beyond the forest edge: Ecology, diversity and conservation of the grassy biomes. Biological Conservation, 143(10): 2395–2404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brando P M, Coe M T, DeFries R et al., 2013. Ecology, economy and management of an agroindustrial frontier landscape in the southeast Amazon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 368(1619): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deines J M, Liu X, Liu J, 2015. Telecoupling in urban water systems: An examination of Beijing’s imported water supply. Water International, 41(2): 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley J A, Defries R, Asner G P et al., 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734): 570–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furtado A M M, Ponte F C, 2013. Mapeamento de Unidades de Relevo do Estado do Pará. Revista GeoAmazônica, 2(2): 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett R D, Rausch L L, 2016. Green for gold: Social and ecological tradeoffs influencing the sustainability of the Brazilian soy industry. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(2): 461–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs H K, Munger J, L’Roe J et al., 2016. Did Ranchers and slaughterhouses respond to zero–deforestation agreements in the Brazilian Amazon? Conservation Letters, 9(1): 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs H K, Rausch L, Munger J et al., 2015. Brazil’s Soy Moratorium. Science, 347(6220): 377–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulina J, Bocetti C, Campa III H et al., 2017. Telecoupling framework for research on migratory species in the Anthropocene. Elementa Science of the Anthroponcene, 5(5): 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klink C A, Machado R B, 2005. Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conservation Biology, 19(3): 707–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E F, Gibbs H K, Ferreira L et al., 2013. Estimating the world’s potentially available cropland using a bottom–up approach. Global Environmental Change, 23(5): 892–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P, 2011. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9): 3465–3472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapola D M, Martinelli L A, Peres C A et al., 2014. Pervasive transition of the Brazilian land–use system. Nature Climate Change, 4(1): 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapola D M, Schaldach R, Alcamo J et al., 2010. Indirect land–use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(8): 3388–3393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter S R et al., 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317(5844): 1513–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Dou Y, Batistella M et al., 2018. Spillover systems in a telecoupled Anthropocene: Typology, methods, and governance for global sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 33: 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Hull V, Batistella M et al., 2013. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society, 18(2): 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Hull V, Luo J et al., 2015a. Multiple telecouplings and their complex interrelationships. Ecology and Society, 20(3): 44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Mooney H, Hull V et al., 2015b. Systems integration for global sustainability. Science, 347(6225): 963–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Yang W, Li S, 2016. Framing ecosystem services in the telecoupled Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(1): 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo M N, DeFries R S, Morton D C et al., 2012. Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(4): 1341–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyfroidt P, Lambin E F, 2009. Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(38): 16139–16144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton D C, DeFries R S, Shimabukuro Y E et al., 2006. Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(39): 14637–14641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad D, Mcgrath D, Stickler C et al., 2014. Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science, 344(6188): 1118–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santopuoli G, Marchetti M, Giongo M, 2016. Supporting policy decision makers in the establishment of forest plantations, using SWOT analysis and AHPs analysis: A case study in Tocantins (Brazil). Land Use Policy, 54: 549–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos C A C, Oliveira V G, 2017. Trends in extreme climate indices for Pará State, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, 32(1): 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva R F B D, Batistella M, Moran E F, 2016. Drivers of land change: Human–environment interactions and the Atlantic forest transition in the Paraíba Valley, Brazil. Land Use Policy, 58: 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares–filho B, Rajão R, Macedo M et al., 2014. Cracking Brazil’s forest code. Science, 344(6182): 363–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Mooney H, Wu W B et al., 2018. Importing food damages domestic environment: Evidence from global soybean trade. PNAS, 115(21): 5415–5419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Tong Y, Liu J, 2017. Telecoupled land–use changes in distant countries. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(2): 368–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F, Liu J, 2016. Conservation planning beyond giant pandas: The need for an innovative telecoupling framework. Science China Life Sciences, 60(5): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Tang H, Yang P et al., 2011. Scenario–based assessment of future food security. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 21(1): 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Hyndman D W, Winkler J A et al., 2016. Urban water sustainability: Framework and application. Ecology and Society, 21(4): 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Z, Zhang L, Tang S et al., 2017. The basic characteristics and spatial patterns of global cultivated land change since the 1980s. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 27(7): 771–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zhao N, Liu X et al., 2016. Global virtual–land flow and saving through international cereal trade. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(5): 619–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Sue Nichols for her constructive comments and edits, and Dr. Mateus Batistella for his helpful critiques and insights.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianguo Liu.

Additional information

Foundation: US National Science Foundation Award, No.1518518; Complex Dynamics of Telecoupled Human and Natural System; Michigan AgBioResearch; São Paulo Research Foundation, No.15/25892-7

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dou, Y., da Silva, R.F.B., Yang, H. et al. Spillover effect offsets the conservation effort in the Amazon. J. Geogr. Sci. 28, 1715–1732 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1539-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1539-0

Keywords

  • telecoupling
  • Amazon
  • Cerrado
  • Brazil
  • soybean trade
  • spillover
  • voluntary agreement
  • deforestation
  • conservation
  • development