Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling the spatio-temporal changes in land uses and its impacts on ecosystem services in Northeast China over 2000–2050

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land use and its dynamics have attracted considerable scientific attention for their significant ecological and socioeconomic implications. Many studies have investigated the past changes in land use, but efforts exploring the potential changes in land use and implications under future scenarios are still lacking. Here we simulate the future land use changes and their impacts on ecosystem services in Northeast China (NEC) over the period of 2000–2050 using the CLUE–S (Conversion of Land Use and its Effects at Small regional extent) model under the scenarios of ecological security (ESS), food security (FSS) and comprehensive development (CDS). The model was validated against remote sensing data in 2005. Overall, the accuracy of the CLUE–S model was evaluated at 82.5%. Obtained results show that future cropland changes mainly occur in the Songnen Plain and the Liaohe Plain, forest and grassland changes are concentrated in the southern Lesser Khingan Mountains and the western Changbai Mountains, while the Sanjiang Plain will witness major changes of the wetlands. Our results also show that even though CDS is defined based on the goals of the regional development plan, the ecological service value (ESV) under CDS is RMB 2656.18 billion in 2050. The ESV of CDS is lower compared with the other scenarios. Thus, CDS is not an optimum scenario for eco-environmental protection, especially for the wetlands, which should be given higher priority for future development. The issue of coordination is also critical in future development. The results can help to assist structural adjustments for agriculture and to guide policy interventions in NEC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barreto L, Schoorl J M, Kok K et al., 2013. Modelling potential landscape sediment delivery due to projected soybean expansion: A scenario study of the Balsas sub–basin, Cerrado, Maranhão state, Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management, 115: 270–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla–Moheno M, Aide T M, Clark M, 2012. The influence of socioeconomic, environmental, and demographic factors on municipality–scale land–cover change in Mexico. Regional Environmental Change, 12(3): 543–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S R, Mooney H A, Agard J et al., 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(5): 1305–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Qian C, Deng A et al., 2012. Progressive and active adaptations of cropping system to climate change in Northeast China. European Journal of Agronomy, 38: 94–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Wang J, Fu B et al., 2001. Land–use change in a small catchment of northern Loess Plateau, China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 86(2): 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, 1989. Model goodness of fit: A multiple resolution procedure. Ecological Modelling, 47(3/4): 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R et al., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P et al., 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26: 152–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David B L A C, 2007. Global scale climate–crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environmental Research Letters, 2(1): 14002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan P, Qin L, Wang Y et al., 2016. Spatial pattern characteristics of water footprint for maize production in Northeast China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 96(2): 561–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eitelberg D A, Vliet J, Verburg P H, 2015. A review of global potentially available cropland estimates and their consequences for model–based assessments. Global Change Biology, 21(3): 1236–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B, Zhang L, Xu Z et al., 2015. Ecosystem services in changing land use. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 15(4): 833–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan J, Villar S C, Klepeis P et al., 2001. Modeling tropical deforestation in the southern Yucatán peninsular region: Comparing survey and satellite data. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85(1–3): 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang W, Chen Z, Lei X et al., 2016. Simulation of urban agglomeration ecosystem spatial distributions under different scenarios: A case study of the Changsha–Zhuzhou–Xiangtan urban agglomeration. Ecological Engineering, 88: 112–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P, 2011. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9): 3465–3472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letourneau A, Verburg P H, Stehfest E, 2012. A land–use systems approach to represent land–use dynamics at continental and global scales. Environmental Modelling & Software, 33: 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Tang H, Yang P et al., 2012. Spatio–temporal responses of cropland phenophases to climate change in Northeast China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 22(1): 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Deng X, 2010. Progress of the research methodologies on the temporal and spatial process of LUCC. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(14): 1354–1362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry M, Arnell N, Hulme M et al., 1998. Adapting to the inevitable. Nature, 395: 741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy P, Roy A, Joshi P et al., 2015. Development of decadal (1985–1995–2005) land use and land cover database for India. Remote Sensing, 7(3): 2401–2430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serneels S, Lambin E F, 2001. Proximate causes of land–use change in Narok District, Kenya: A spatial statistical model. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85(1–3): 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer A W, 2005. Approaching scenario–based studies: Three perceptions about the future and considerations for landscape planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32: 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song W, Deng X, Yuan Y et al., 2015. Impacts of land–use change on valued ecosystem service in rapidly urbanized North China Plain. Ecological Modelling, 318: 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stürck J, Schulp C J E, Verburg P H, 2015. Spatio–temporal dynamics of regulating ecosystem services in Europe: The role of past and future land use change. Applied Geography, 63: 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian L, 2015. Land use dynamics driven by rural industrialization and land finance in the peri–urban areas of China: The examples of Jiangyin and Shunde. Land Use Policy, 45: 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vliet J, Bregt A K, Hagen–Zanker A, 2011. Revisiting kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land–use change models. Ecological Modelling, 222(8): 1367–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vliet J, Hagen–Zanker A, Hurkens J et al., 2013. A fuzzy set approach to assess the predictive accuracy of land use simulations. Ecological Modelling, 261/262: 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P, Berkel D, Doorn A et al., 2010. Trajectories of land use change in Europe: A model–based exploration of rural futures. Landscape Ecology, 25(2): 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P H, Overmars K P, 2009. Combining top–down and bottom–up dynamics in land use modeling: Exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the dyna–CLUE model. Landscape Ecology, 24(9): 1167–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P H, Rounsevell M D A, Veldkamp A, 2006. Scenario–based studies of future land use in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114(1): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P H, Soepboer W, Veldkamp A et al., 2002. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: The CLUE–S model. Environmental Management, 30(3): 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Xiong Z, Yan X, 2015. Modeling the climatic effects of the land use/cover change in eastern China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 87/88: 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Zhang B, Zhang S et al., 2006. Changes of land use and of ecosystem service values in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 112(1–3): 69–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia T, Wu W, Zhou Q et al., 2014. Spatio–temporal changes in the rice planting area and their relationship to climate change in Northeast China: A model–based analysis. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(7): 1575–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia T, Wu W, Zhou Q et al., 2016. Model–based analysis of spatio–temporal changes in land use in Northeast China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(2): 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu G, Huang X, Zhong T et al., 2015. Assessment on the effect of city arable land protection under the implementation of China’s national general land use plan (2006–2020). Habitat International, 49: 466–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye L, Tang H, Zhu J et al., 2008. Spatial patterns and effects of soil organic carbon on grain productivity assessment in China. Soil Use and Management, 24(1): 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye L, Xiong W, Li Z et al., 2013. Climate change impact on China food security in 2050. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 33(2): 363–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Tiyip T, Feng Z D et al., 2015. Spatio–temporal patterns of land use/cover changes over the past 20 years in the middle reaches of the Tarim River, Xinjiang, China. Land Degradation & Development, 26(3): 284–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Xiong Z, Zhang X et al., 2016. Using multi–model ensembles to improve the simulated effects of land use/cover change on temperature: A case study over Northeast China. Climate Dynamics, 46(3/4): 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Wang X, Zhao X et al., 2014. A 2010 update of national land use/cover database of China at 1:100000 scale using medium spatial resolution satellite images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 149(149): 142–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenbin Wu.

Additional information

Foundation: Agricultural Outstanding Talents Research Foundation of Ministry of Agriculture (MOA); Key Laboratory of Agri–Informatics Foundation of MOA No.2015001; Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province No.2016CFB558; The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, No.CCNU15A05058

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, T., Wu, W., Zhou, Q. et al. Modeling the spatio-temporal changes in land uses and its impacts on ecosystem services in Northeast China over 2000–2050. J. Geogr. Sci. 28, 1611–1625 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1532-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1532-7

Keywords

Navigation