Advertisement

Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 656–668 | Cite as

Rainfall-runoff risk characteristics of urban function zones in Beijing using the SCS-CN model

  • Lei Yao
  • Wei Wei
  • Yang Yu
  • Jun Xiao
  • Liding Chen
Article

Abstract

Urbanization significantly increases the risk of urban flooding. Therefore, quantitative study of urban rainfall-runoff processes can provide a scientific basis for urban planning and management. In this paper, the built-up region within the Fifth Ring Road of Beijing was selected as the study area. The details of land cover and urban function zones (UFZs) were identified using GIS and RS methods. On this basis, the SCS-CN model was adopted to analyze the rainfall-runoff risk characteristics of the study area. The results showed that: (1) UFZs within different levels of runoff risk varied under different rainfall conditions. The area ratio of the UFZs with high runoff risk increased from 18.90% (for rainfall return period of 1a) to 54.74% (for period of 100a). Specifically, urban commercial areas tended to have the highest runoff risk, while urban greening spaces had the lowest. (2) The spatial characteristics of the runoff risks showed an obvious circular distribution. Spatial cluster areas with high runoff risk were mainly concentrated in the center of the study area, while those with low runoff risk were mainly distributed between the fourth and fifth ring roads. The results indicated that the spatial clustering characteristic of urban runoff risk and runoff heterogeneity among different UFZs should be fully considered during urban rainwater management.

Keywords

SCS-CN model urban function zone spatial cluster runoff risk 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armson D, Stringer P, Ennos A R, 2013. The effect of street trees and amenity grass on urban surface water runoff in Manchester, UK. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(3): 282–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson S, 2012. A storm water runoff investigation using GIS and remote sensing [D]. Unviersity of North Texas.Google Scholar
  3. Baker T J, Miller S N, 2013. Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to assess land use impact on water resources in an East African watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 486(8): 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunnett N, Nagase A, Booth R et al., 2008. Influence of vegetation composition on runoff in two simulated green roof experiments. Urban Ecosystems, 11(4): 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ebrahimian A, Gulliver J S, Wilson B N, 2016. Effective impervious area for runoff in urban watersheds. Hydrological Processes, 30(20): 3717–3729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fan F L, Deng Y B, Hu X F et al., 2013. Estimating composite curve number using an Improved SCS-CN Method with Remotely Sensed Variables in Guangzhou, China. Remote Sensing, 5(3): 1425–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fu S H, Wang H Y, Wang X L et al., 2013. The runoff curve number of SCS-CN method in Beijing. Geographical Research, 32(5): 797–807. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Gajbhiye S, Mishra S, 2012. Application of NRSC-SCS curve number model in runoff estimation using RS & GIS, International Conference on Advances in Engineering, Science and Management, IEEE, 346–352.Google Scholar
  9. GB50014, 2013. Code for Design of Outdoor Wastewater Engineering. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Gill S, Handley J, Ennos A et al., 2007. Adapting cities for climate change: The role of the green infrastructure. Built Environment, 33(1): 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jarden K M, Jefferson A J, Grieser J M, 2015. Assessing the effects of catchment-scale urban green infrastructure retrofits on hydrograph characteristics. Hydrological Processes, 291(1): 6–14.Google Scholar
  12. Jiang M, Chen H, Chen Q, 2013. A method to analyze “source–sink” structure of non-point source pollution based on remote sensing technology. Environmental Pollution, 182: 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kadam A K, Kale S S, Pande N N et al., 2012. Identifying potential rainwater harvesting sites of a semi-arid, basaltic region of Western India, using SCS-CN method. Water Resources Management, 26(9): 2537–2554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin F T, 2000. GIS-based information flow in a land-use zoning review process. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52(1): 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Milly P, Wetherald R, Dunne K et al., 2002. Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature, 415: 514–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. NRCS, 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Technical Release, 55: 2–6.Google Scholar
  17. Ouyang W, Guo B, Hao F et al., 2012. Modeling urban storm rainfall runoff from diverse underlying surfaces and application for control design in Beijing. Journal of Environmental Management, 113(1): 467–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pan A, Zhang S, Meng Q et al., 2009. Initial concept of stormwater and flood management in Beijing city. China Water & Wastewater, 25(22): 9–12. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Putro B, Kjeldsen T R, Hutchins M G et al., 2016. An empirical investigation of climate and land-use effects on water quantity and quality in two urbanising catchments in the southern United Kingdom. Science of The Total Environment, 548/549: 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shuster W D, Bonta J, Thurston H et al., 2005. Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review. Urban Water Journal, 2(4): 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Singh P K, Yaduvanshi B K, Patel S et al., 2013. SCS-CN based quantification of potential of rooftop catchments and computation of ASRC for rainwater harvesting. Water Resources Management, 27(7): 2001–2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Skotnicki M, Sowinski M, 2013. The influence of depression storage on runoff from impervious surface of urban catchment. Urban Water Journal, 12(3): 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Su M, Zheng Y, Hao Y et al., 2017. The influence of landscape pattern on the risk of urban water-logging and flood disaster. Ecological Indicators, doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.008Google Scholar
  24. Sun R, Lü Y, Chen L et al., 2013. Assessing the stability of annual temperatures for different urban functional zones. Building and Environment, 65(7): 90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sunde M, He H S, Hubbart J A et al., 2016. Forecasting streamflow response to increased imperviousness in an urbanizing Midwestern watershed using a coupled modeling approach. Applied Geography, 72: 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tian G J, Wu J G, Yang Z F, 2010. Spatial pattern of urban functions in the Beijing metropolitan region. Habitat International, 34(2): 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang Q, Zhang X, Wei M et al., 2011. Research summary of planning and design standards for storm water system in Beijing city. Water & Wastewater Engineering, 37(10): 34–39.Google Scholar
  28. Yao L, Chen L, Wei W, 2017. Exploring the linkage between urban flood risk and spatial patterns in small urbanized catchments of Beijing, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3): 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yao L, Chen L, Wei W et al., 2015. Potential reduction in urban runoff by green spaces in Beijing: A scenario analysis. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(2): 300–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yao L, Wei W, Chen L, 2016. How does imperviousness impact the urban rainfall-runoff process under various storm cases? Ecological Indicators, 60: 893–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang B, Xie G, Zhang C et al., 2012a. The economic benefits of rainwater-runoff reduction by urban green spaces: A case study in Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 100(10): 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang X, Zhang X, Hu S et al., 2012b. Runoff and sediment modeling in a peri-urban artificial landscape: Case study of Olympic Forest Park in Beijing. Journal of Hydrology, 485: 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhou F, Xu Y, Chen Y et al., 2013. Hydrological response to urbanization at different spatio-temporal scales simulated by coupling of CLUE-S and the SWAT model in the Yangtze River Delta region. Journal of Hydrology, 485: 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhu Z, Chen Z, Chen X et al., 2016. Approach for evaluating inundation risks in urban drainage systems. Science of The Total Environment, 553: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zuo D, Xu Z, Yao W et al., 2016. Assessing the effects of changes in land use and climate on runoff and sediment yields from a watershed in the Loess Plateau of China. Science of The Total Environment, 544: 238–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR), Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lei Yao
    • 1
  • Wei Wei
    • 2
  • Yang Yu
    • 2
  • Jun Xiao
    • 2
  • Liding Chen
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Geography and EnvironmentShandong Normal UniversityJinanChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional EcologyResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, CASBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations