Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 579–594 | Cite as

The spatiotemporal responses of Populus euphratica to global warming in Chinese oases between 1960 and 2015

  • Wenxia Zhang
  • Puxing Liu
  • Qingrong Feng
  • Tianguang Wang
  • Tianqiang Wang


Daily average temperature data from 48 meteorological stations in Chinese oases that are within the distribution area of Populus euphratica were analyzed to determine the spatiotemporal responses of this tree to climate change. Specifically, the start and end date as well as the number of days that comprised the growing season were analyzed with a multi-year trend line and using the Mann-Kendall mutation test, inverse distance weighted interpolation (IDW) in the software ArcGIS, a Morlet wavelet power spectrum, and correlation analysis. The results of this study show that, over the last 56 years, the start date of the P. euphratica growing season has advanced, while the end date has been postponed, and the number of days that comprise the growing season have gradually increased. The changing trend rates recovered in this analysis for these three time slices are –1.34 d/10 a, 1.33 d/10a, and 2.66 d/10a (α ⩾ 0.001), respectively. Data show that while spatial disparity is extremely significant, it is nevertheless the case that along a southwest-to-northeast transect of Chinese oases, the later the start date of the P. euphratica season, the sooner the end data and the shorter the growing season. Mutations points in start and end date, as well as for the growing season overall were observed in 2001, 1989, and 1996, respectively, and the data presented in this paper show that, in particular, the date of this end of this period is most sensitive to climate warming. Growing season cycles for P. euphratica are between 3.56 years and 7.14 years, consistent with the periodicity of El Niño events, while a start date cycle between 3.56 years and 4.28 years is consistent with atmospheric circulation cyclicity. The causal analysis presented in this paper shows that the Asian polar vortex area index (APVAI), the Qinghai- Tibet Plateau index (TPI), the westerly circulation index (WCI), and carbon dioxide emissions (CDE) are the main factors influencing spatiotemporal changes in the growth of P. euphratica, the effect of latitude during the growing season is more significant than altitude, and the start date of the growing season is more significantly influenced by these factors than end date. In addition, data show that the start date, end date, and length of the growing season are all significantly correlated with their average corresponding monthly temperature (correlation coefficients are –0.875, 0.770, and 0.897; α⩾0.001). Thus, if the average temperature in March increases by 1°C, the start date of the growing season will advance by 2.21 days, while if the average temperature in October increases by the same margin then the seasonal end date will be delayed by 2.76 days. Similarly, if the average temperature between March and October increases by 1°C, the growing season will be extended by 7.78 days. The results of this study corroborate the fact that changes in the P. euphratica growing are sensitive to regional warming and are thus of considerable theoretical significance to our understanding of the responses of Chinese vegetation to climate change as well as to ecological restoration.


Populus euphratica annual growing season global warming responses to climate change Chinese oases 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bai J, Ge Q S, Dai J H, 2009. Response of woody plant phenophases to climate change for recent 30 years in Guiyang. Geographical Research, 28(6): 1606–1614. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. Beaubien E G, Freeland H J, 2000. Spring phenology trends in Alberta, Canada: Links to ocean temperature. International Journal of Biometeorology, 44(2): 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang Z F, Qiu G Y, Zhao M et al., 2009. Responses of plant phenology to climate warming in Minqin desert area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(10): 5195–5206. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. Chen X Q, Pang C, Xu L et al., 2015. Spatiotemporal response of Salix matsudana’s phenophases to climate change in China’s temperate zone. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(11): 3625–3635. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Chen X Q, Peng J D, Li H M, 2009. Seasonal and regional differences of air temperature changes in Inner Mongolia. Geographical Research, 28(1): 27–35. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Chen X Q, Xu L, 2012. Temperature controls on the spatial pattern of tree phenology in China’s temperate zone. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 154/155: 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen X Q, Yu R, 2007. Spatial and temporal variations of the vegetation growing season in warm-temperate Eastern China during 1982 to 1999. Acta Geographica Sinica, 62(1): 41–51. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Chmielewski F M, Rötzer T, 2001. Response of tree phenology to climate change across Europe. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 108(2): 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cola G, Failla O, Maghradze D et al., 2016. Grapevine phenology and climate change in Georgia. International Journal of Biometeorology, 61: 761–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Defila C, Clot B, 2001. Phytophenological trends in Switzerland. International Journal of Biometeorology, 45(4): 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fang X Q, Yu W H, 2002. Progress in the studies on the phenological responding to global warming. Advances in Earth Sciences, 17(5): 714–719. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Fitchett J M, Grab S W, Thompson D I et al., 2014. Spatio-temporal variation in phenological response of citrus to climate change in Iran: 1960–2010. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 198–199: 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fu Y H, Campioli M, Demarée G et al., 2012. Bayesian calibration of the uUnified budburst model in six temperate tree species. International Journal of Biometeorology, 56: 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao Q, Chen J, Yan F et al., 2012. Phenological characteristics of herbaceous plants in Hebei Province and their responses to climate warming. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 31(3): 600–605. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Ge Q S, Dai J H, Zheng J Y, 2010. The progress of phenology studies and challenges to modern phenology research in China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 25(3): 310–316. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Juknys R, Kanapickas A, Šveikauskaite I et al., 2016. Response of deciduous trees spring phenology to recent and projected climate change in Central Lithuania. International Journal of Biometeorology, 60(10): 1589–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li J F, 1991. Xinjiang Climate. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 75–76. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Li Q H, Chen Y N, Shen Y J et al., 2011. Spatial and temporal trends of climate change in Xinjiang, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 21(6): 1007–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu J, Zheng Y F, Zhao G Q et al., 2007. Responses of phenology to climate change in the Zhengzhou area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(4): 1471–1479. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Liu P X, Zhang K X, 2011. Climate characteristic of seasonal variation and its influence on annual growth period of Populus euphratica populous euphratica Olive in the Hexi Corridor in recent 55 years. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(3): 882–888. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Liu Q, H. Fu Y S, Zhu Z C et al., 2016. Delayed autumn phenology in the Northern Hemisphere is related to change in both climate and spring phenology. Global Change Biology, 22: 3702–3711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Menzel A, Fabian P, 1999. Growing season extended in Europe. Nature, 397(6721): 659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pei S X, Guo Q S, Xin X B et al., 2009. Research on plant phenological responses to climate change abroad. World forestry research, 22(6): 31–37. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. Qin D H, Thomas S et al., 2014. Highlights of the IPCC Working Group I Fifth Assessment Report. Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis, 10(1): 1–6. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. Roetzer T, Wittenzeller M, Haeckel H et al., 2000. Phenology in central Europe: Differences and trends of spring phenophases in urban and rural areas. International Journal of Biometeorology, 44(2): 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwartz M D, Reiter B E, 2000. Changes in North American spring. International Journal of Climatology, 20(8): 929–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shen Y C, Wang J W, Wu G H et al., 2001. Oaseis of China. Zhengzhou: Henan University Press, 278–284. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Shi X H, Zhao Y N, Dai S et al., 2005. Research on climatic change of Qaidam Basin since 1961. Journal of Desert Research, 25(1): 123–128. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Sparks T H, Jeffree E P, Jeffree C E, 2000. An examination of the relationship between flowering times and temperature at the national scale using long-term phenological records from the UK. International Journal of Biometeorology, 44(2): 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Szabó B, Vincze E, Czúcz B, 2016. Flowering phenological changes in relation to climate change in Hungary. International Journal of Biometeorology, 60(9): 1347–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang J A, 2007. Chinese Geography Course. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 33–34. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  32. Wang S J, Chen B H, Li H Q, 1995. Populus Euphratica. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 16–18. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. Wei Q J, 1990. Populus Euphratica. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 7–21. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  34. Zhang F C, 1995. Effects of global warming on plant phonological evertsevents in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 50(5): 402–410. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  35. Zhao M L, Liu P X, Zhu X J et al., 2012. Response of Populus euphratica Oliv. Phenology to climate warming in the oasis of lower reaches of Heihe River from 1960 to 2010. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 32(10): 2108–2115. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR), Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenxia Zhang
    • 1
  • Puxing Liu
    • 1
  • Qingrong Feng
    • 1
  • Tianguang Wang
    • 1
  • Tianqiang Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Geography and Environmental ScienceNorthwest Normal UniversityLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations