Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial difference and mechanisms of influence of geo-economy in the border areas of China

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Border areas are both important territorial security barriers and portals to the outside world. Considering the complicated geopolitical environment of China’s inland borders, analysis of the current status and mechanisms of influence of geo-economy in border areas is of great significance. Namely, this analysis is important towards leveraging traditional advantages to accelerate China’s development in border and minority areas. Based on a comprehensive analysis, our study constructed a framework to analyze the geo-economy in border areas, and also introduced three indexes: local economy, export-oriented economy and local development. In addition, our study systematically described geo-economic evolution in the border areas of China. We also analyzed the mechanism of geo-economic spatial differentiation in these border areas by using geographical detectors. Our results indicated that the level of geo-economic influence in border areas has grown steadily with significant spatial differentiation. The absolute geo-economic dominance of Northeast China gradually declines over time. Areas with geo-economic advantages are highly dispersed, showing a spatial polarization pattern with several polar nuclei including Mudanjiang city (Northeast China), Baotou city (Inner Mongolia), Bortala Mongol Autonomous Prefecture (Xinjiang), Dehong Dai and Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture and the city of Chongzuo (Yunnan-Guangxi area). Geo-economics in border area is mainly influenced by national policies, the development level of neighboring countries, as well as the desire of these countries to cooperate with China in bilateral trade. Favorable policies, traffic, cultural proximity and other factors also impact the geo-economics of border areas significantly. The Inner Mongolia and Tibet areas are mainly influenced by neighboring countries, while Northeast China and Xinjiang are mainly affected by Chinese policies; the Yunnan-Guangxi area is influenced by a combination of these factors. At the end of the study, we provide our recommendations for developing policies that further geo-economic advantages in complex geopolitical environments and in areas with varied development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brunet-Jailly E, 2005. Theorizing borders: An interdisciplinary perspective. Geopolitics, 10(4): 633–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley P J, Clegg L J, Cross A et al., 2007. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Mingxing, Lu Dadao, Zhang Hua, 2009. Comprehensive evaluation and the driving factors of China’s urbanization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 64(4): 387–398. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou Kuang-Hann, Chen Chien-Hsun, Mai Chao-Cheng, 2011. The impact of third-country effects and economic integration on China’s outward FDI. Economic Modelling, 28: 2154–2163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Jun, 2004. A research on geo-economic cooperation in Northeast Asia [D]. Changchun: Jilin University. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Hongjian, Yu Zhenguo, 2008. An analysis of the match between the direction and intensity of urban economic contact and the geoeconomic relationship. China Soft Science, (3): 44–51. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng Guoqun, Ding Sibao, 2005. Retrospect and prospect of the cross-border cooperation study. World Regional Studies, 14(1): 53–59. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Jiaxiang, 2008. Geo-economy and China’s geo-strategy in Central Asia [D]. Lanzhou: Northwest Normal University. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Shuqin, 2009. The factor ‘Natural Resources’ in the transformation of global geopolitics and geo-economy. Resources Sciences, 31(2): 343–351. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson G H, 1998. Regional adjustment to trade liberalization. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 28: 419–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Zhiding, Ge Yuejing, Bao Jie et al., 2013. The spatial pattern and differentiation laws of geo-setting in South Asia. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 33(6): 685–692. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Hui, 2011. A research on geo-economic cooperation of China and its neighbors [D]. Changchun: Northeast Normal University. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin Fenghua, Du Jizhong, 2004. Measurement and analysis on the economic relations of the similar regional origin in Yangtze Delta. East China Economic Management, 18(1): 4–6. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Guangdong, Fang Chuanglin, 2014. Quantitative measure and influencing mechanism of land intensive use in China at the county level. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(12): 1739–1752. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Hong, 2008. Border Economy: The Entry Point of the Regional Cooperation between China and ASEAN. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Peng, 2006. On the cooperation development of geoeconomic regions and its practice tactics adjustment: Taking the analysis of cooperation development of geoeconomic regions between China and ASEAN as an example. Economic Geography, 26(2): 186–191. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Zheng, Chen Cai, Xiong Liran, 2014. An analysis on the theory origin and development vein of geo-economics abroad. World Regional Studies, 23(1): 10–18. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Chuanming, Zeng Juxin, 2011. The calculating method about the comprehensive transport accessibility and its correlation with economic development at country level: The statistical analysis of 79 counties in Hubei Province. Geographical Research, 30(12): 2209–2221. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Yuanyuan, Tu Jianjun, 2011. Study on the geo-economic relations of Central Plains Economic Zone. Areal Research and Development, 30(6): 156–159. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Dadao, Du Debin, 2013. Some thoughts on the strengthening of geopolitical and geo-economic studies. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68(6): 723–727. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Huasong, Li Feng, 2010. An analysis of the optimal cooperation model of Yunnan multilateral industrial cooperation. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 42(2): 65–71. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttwak E N, 1990. From geopolitics to geoeconomics: Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The National Interest, 20(3): 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman D, Paasi A, 1998. Fences and neighbors in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2): 186–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye J, 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan Zhongqi, Huang Renwei, 2008. Geo-economic strategies of China. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 23(5): 116–122. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker G, 1998. Geopolitics: Past, Present and Future. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratti R, Reichman S, 1993. Theory and Practice of Transborder Cooperation. Verlag Helbing & Lichtenhahn, Basel und Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sit V F S, 1998. Hong Kong’s “transferred” industrialization and industrial geography. Asian Survey, 38(9): 880–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklair L, 1993. Assembling for Development: The Maquila Industry in Mexico and the US. San Diago: Center for US-Mexico Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Tao, Liu Weidong, Li Le, 2016. International research on the border regions with a geopolitical perspective and revelation. Progress in Geography, 35(3): 276–285. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Tao, Lu Dadao, Liang Yi et al., 2016. Research progress of international geopolitics, 1996–2015. Acta Geographica Sinica, 71(4): 551–563. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Su X B, 2012. Rescaling the Chinese state and regionalization in the Great Mekong Subregion. Review of International Political Economy, 19(3): 501–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Xueqiong, Yang Qianhao, Qian Junxi, 2016. Meanings and practices of borders from the perspective of cross-border mobility: A case study of village X, Hekou, Yunnan at the Sino-Vietnamese borderlands. Geographical Research, 35(8): 1535–1546. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Venables A J, 1996. Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries. International Economic Review, 37(2): 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J F, Hu Y, 2012. Environmental health risk detection with GeogDetector. Environmental Modeling & Software, 33: 114–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Limao, Li Hongqiang, 2009. Cooperation and competition of oil and gas resources between China and its neighboring countries and its impacts on geopolitics. Resources Sciences, 31(10): 1633–1639. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen Zhihong, 1998. Distance analysis: A method for evaluating geo-economic relations. Statistics & Decision, (1): 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Wen, Wang Zheng, 2012. New geopolinomic frame and economic crisis. World Regional Studies, 21(4): 1–12. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Wenlong, Du Debin, Liu Chengliang et al., 2016. Study on the spatial-temporal evolution and internal mechanism of geo-economic connections of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 71(6): 956–969. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Guozheng, Fan Hua, 2009. On building a new subject: Geo-geography. World Regional Studies, 18(3): 146–153. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan Dongsheng, Zhang Wenzhong, Yu Jianhui et al., 2015. Analysis of influencing mechanism of residents’ livability satisfaction in Beijing using geographical detector. Progress in Geography, 34(8): 966–975. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China

    Tao Song, Yi Cheng, Weidong Liu & Hui Liu

  2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China

    Tao Song, Yi Cheng, Weidong Liu & Hui Liu

  3. Collaborative Innovation Center for Geopolitical Setting of Southwest China and Borderland Development, Kunming, 650500, China

    Tao Song

  4. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Yi Cheng & Hui Liu

Authors
  1. Tao Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weidong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hui Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Cheng.

Additional information

Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41701131, No.41530634; Key Consulting Project of the Chinese Academy of Science and Technology Strategic Consulting, No.Y02015001; Funding of Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, No.Y55R1203YZ

Author: Song Tao (1983–), PhD, specialized in geopolitics and regional sustainable development.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, T., Cheng, Y., Liu, W. et al. Spatial difference and mechanisms of influence of geo-economy in the border areas of China. J. Geogr. Sci. 27, 1463–1480 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-017-1447-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-017-1447-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation