Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 746–766 | Cite as

A review of historical reconstruction methods of land use/land cover

  • Yuanyuan Yang
  • Shuwen ZhangEmail author
  • Jiuchun Yang
  • Liping Chang
  • Kun Bu
  • Xiaoshi Xing


Understanding long-term human-environment interactions requires historical reconstruction of past land-use and land-cover changes. Most reconstructions have been based primarily on consistently available and relatively standardized information from historical sources. Based on available data sources and a retrospective research, in this paper we review the approaches and methods of the digital reconstruction and analyze their advantages and possible constraints in the following aspects: (1) Historical documents contain qualitative or semi-quantitative information about past land use, which also usually include land-cover data, but preparation of archival documents is very time-consuming. (2) Historical maps and pictures offer visual and spatial quantitative land-cover information. (3) Natural archive has significant advantages as a method for reconstructing past vegetation and has its unique possibilities especially when historical records are missing or lacking, but it has great limits of rebuilding certain land-cover types. (4) Historical reconstruction models have been gradually developed from empirical models to mechanistic ones. The method does not only reconstruct the quantity of land use/cover in historical periods, but it also reproduces the spatial distribution. Yet there are still few historical land-cover datasets with high spatial resolution. (5) Reconstruction method based on multiple-source data and multidisciplinary research could build historical land-cover from multiple perspectives, complement the missing data, verify reconstruction results and thus improve reconstruction accuracy. However, there are challenges that make the method still in the exploratory stage. This method can be a long-term development goal for the historical land-cover reconstruction. Researchers should focus on rebuilding historical land-cover dataset with high spatial resolution by developing new models so that the study results could be effectively applied in simulations of climatic and ecological effects.


review historical reconstruction land use land cover 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bai Shuying, Zhang Shuwen, 2004. The discussion of the method of land utilization spatial information reappearance of history period. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 18(5): 77–80. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. Bai Shuying, Zhang Shuwen, Zhang Yangzhen, 2007. Digital rebuilding of LUCC spatial-temporal distribution of the last 100 years: Taking Dorbod Mongolian Autonomous County in Daqing City as an example. Acta Geographica Sinica, 62(4): 427–436. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. Bakker M M, Govers G, Kosmas C et al., 2005. Soil erosion as a driver of land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment, 105(3): 467–481.Google Scholar
  4. Barclay G, 2005. Farmers, Temples and Tombs (Making of Scotland). Edinburgh: Birlinn Press, 64.Google Scholar
  5. Batek M J, Rebertus A J, Schroeder W A et al., 1999. Reconstruction of early nineteenth-century vegetation and fire regimes in the Missouri Ozaks. Journal of Biogeography, 26(2): 397–412.Google Scholar
  6. Bender O, Boehmerb H J, Jens D et al., 2005. Using GIS to analyse long-term cultural landscape change in Southern Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1): 111–125.Google Scholar
  7. Benitez J A, Fish T R, 2004. Historical Land-cover Conversion (1665-1820) in the Choptank Watershed, eastern United States. Ecosystems, 7(3): 219–232.Google Scholar
  8. Berglund B E, 1991. The cultural Landscape during 6,000 Years in Southern Sweden: The Ystad Project (Vol.41). Munksgaard International Booksellers and Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Betancourt J L, Van Devender T R, Martin P S, 1990. Packrat Middens: The Last 40 000 Years of Biotic Change. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bolliger J, Schulte L A, Burrows S N et al., 2004. Assessing ecological restoration potentials of Wisconsin (USA) using historical landscape reconstructions. Restoration Ecology, 12(1): 124–142.Google Scholar
  11. Bolstad P V, Swank W T, 1997. Cumulative impacts of land use on water quality in a southern Appalachian watershed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 33(3): 519–533.Google Scholar
  12. Borde A B, Thom R M, Rumrill S et al., 2003. Geospatial habitat change analysis in Pacific Northwest coastal estuaries. Estuaries, 26(4): 1104–1116.Google Scholar
  13. Boucher Y, Arseneault D, Sirois L et al., 2009. Logging pattern and landscape changes over the last century at the boreal and deciduous forest transition in Eastern Canada. Landscape Ecology, 24(2): 171–184.Google Scholar
  14. Broström A, Nielsen A B, Gaillard M J et al., 2008. Pollen productivity estimates of key European plant taxa for quantitative reconstruction of past vegetation: A review. Veget Hist Archaeobot, 17: 461–478.Google Scholar
  15. Brown D G, 1998. Mapping historical forest types in Baraga County Michigan, USA, as fuzzy sets. Plant Ecology, 134(1): 97–111.Google Scholar
  16. Brun C, 2011. Anthropogenic indicators in pollen diagrams in eastern France: A critical review. Veget Hist Archaeobot, 20(2): 135–142.Google Scholar
  17. Bürgi M, Hersperger A M, Hall M et al., 2007. Using the past to understand the present land use and land cover. In: A Changing World. Netherlands: Springer, 133–144.Google Scholar
  18. Chen Siqing, 2002. Study on land-use/cover change and carbon cycle of Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia based on remote sensing and GIS. Beijing: Institute of Remote Sensing Applications, CAS. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Chen Y, Ni J, 2008. Quantitative palaeovegetation reconstruction at large scale based on pollen records. Journal of Plant Ecology, 32: 1201–1212. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Cogbill C V, Burk J, Motzkin G, 2002. The forests of presettlement New England, USA: Spatial and compositional patterns based on town proprietor surveys. Journal of Biogeography, 29(10/11): 1279–1304.Google Scholar
  21. Cousins S A, 2001. Analysis of land-cover transitions based on 17th and 18th century cadastral maps and aerial photographs. Landscape Ecology, 16: 41–54.Google Scholar
  22. Cousins S A, Eriksson Åsa, Franzén Daniel, 2002. Reconstructing past land use and vegetation patterns using palaeogeographical and archaeological data. A focus on grasslands in Nynas by the Baltic Sea in south-eastern Sweden. Landscape and Urban Planning, 61: 1–18.Google Scholar
  23. Dahlström A, 2008. Grazing dynamics at different spatial and temporal scales: Examples from the Swedish historical record A.D.1620-1850. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 17(5): 563–572.Google Scholar
  24. Dahlström A, Cousins S A, Eriksson O, 2006. The history (1620–2003) of land use, people and livestock, and the relationship to present plant species diversity in a rural landscape in Sweden. Environment and History, 12: 191–212.Google Scholar
  25. Davis M B, 1973. Pollen evidence of changing land use around the shores of Lake Washington. Northwest Science, 47(3): 133–148.Google Scholar
  26. DeFries R S, Eshleman K N, 2004. Land-use change and hydrologic processes: A major focus for the future. Hydrological Processes, 18(11): 2183–2186.Google Scholar
  27. de Sherbinin A, 2002. Land use and land cover change: A CIESIN thematic guide. Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Columbia University, Palisades, NY.Google Scholar
  28. Domaas S T, 2007. The reconstruction of past patterns of tilled fields from historical cadastral maps using GIS. Landscape Research, 32(1): 23–43.Google Scholar
  29. Draganits E, Zámolyi A, Székely B et al., 2008. Reconstruction of the Neusiedlersee (Austria/Hungary) based on historical topographic maps from 1507 to present. In: Geophysical Research Abstracts, 10: 08644.Google Scholar
  30. Dupouey J L, Dambrine E, Laffite J D et al., 2002. Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology, 83(11): 2978–2984.Google Scholar
  31. Edwards K J, MacDonald G M, 1991. Holocene palynology: II. Human influence and vegetation change. Progress in Physical Geography, 15(4): 364–391.Google Scholar
  32. Esper J, Frank D C, Luterbacher J, 2007. On selected issues and challenges in dendroclimatology. In: A Changing World. Netherlands: Springer, 113–132.Google Scholar
  33. Fensham R J, Fairfax R J, 1997. The use of the land survey record to reconstruct pre-European vegetation patterns in the Darling Downs, Queensland, Australia. Journal of Biogeography, 24(6): 827–836.Google Scholar
  34. Foster D R, 1992. Land-use history (1730–1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New England, USA. Journal of Ecology, 80: 753–772.Google Scholar
  35. Foster D R, Motzkin G, Slater B, 1998. Land-use history as long-term broad-scale disturbance: Regional forest dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems, 1(1): 96–119.Google Scholar
  36. Foster D R, Orwig D A, McLachlan J S, 1996. Ecological and conservation insights from reconstructive studies of temperate old-growth forests. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11(10): 419–424.Google Scholar
  37. Foster D R, Swanson F, Aber J D et al., 2003. The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. BioScience, 53(1): 77–88.Google Scholar
  38. Fritts H C, Swetnam T W, 1989. Dendroecology: A tool for evaluating variations in past and present forest environments. Advances in Ecological Research, 19: 111–189.Google Scholar
  39. Fuller J L, Foster D R, McLachlan J S et al., 1998. Impact of human activity on regional forest composition and dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems, 1: 76–95.Google Scholar
  40. Gaillard M J, Sugita S et al., 2008. Human impact on terrestrial ecosystems, pollen calibration and quantitative reconstruction of past land-cover. Veget Hist Archaeobot, 17: 415–418.Google Scholar
  41. Ge Quansheng, Dai Junhu, He Fanneng et al., 2003. Study on cultivated land quantity change and driving factors in some provinces in China over the past 300 years. Natural Science Bulletin, 13(8): 825–832. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  42. Ge Quansheng, Dai Junhu, He Fanneng et al., 2008. The land use/land cover change and the carbon cycle in China in the past 300 years. Science in China, 38(2): 197–210. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  43. Gimmi U, Lachat T, Bürgi M, 2011. Reconstructing the collapse of wetland networks in the Swiss lowlands 1850–2000. Landscape Ecology, 26(8): 1071–1083.Google Scholar
  44. Goldewijk K K, 2001. Estimating global land use change over the past 300 years: The HYDE database. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 15(2): 417–433.Google Scholar
  45. Goldewijk K K, Battjes J J, 1997. A hundred year (1890–1990) database for integrated environmental assessments (HYDE, version 1.1). National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  46. Goldewijk K K, Beusen A, Van Drecht G et al., 2011. The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human-induced global land-use change over the past 12,000 years. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20(1): 73–86.Google Scholar
  47. Goldewijk K K, Ramankutty N, 2004. Land cover change over the last three centuries due to human activities: The availability of new global data sets. GeoJournal, 61(4): 335–344.Google Scholar
  48. Gragson T L, Bolstad P V, 2006. Land use legacies and the future of southern Appalachia. Society and Natural Resources, 19(2): 175–190.Google Scholar
  49. Grossinger R M, Striplen C J, Askevold R A et al., 2007. Historical landscape ecology of an urbanized California valley: Wetlands and woodlands in the Santa Clara Valley. Landscape Ecology, 22(1): 103–120.Google Scholar
  50. Hamre L N, Domaas S T, Austad I et al., 2007. Land-cover and structural changes in a western Norwegian cultural landscape since 1865, based on an old cadastral map and a field survey. Landscape Ecology, 22(10): 1563–1574.Google Scholar
  51. Harding J S, Benfield E F, Bolstad P V et al., 1998. Stream biodiversity: The ghost of land use past. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(25): 14843–14847.Google Scholar
  52. Harley J B, 1989. Historical geography and the cartographic illusion. Journal of Historical Geography, 15(1): 80–91.Google Scholar
  53. He Fanneng, Li Shicheng, Zhang Xuezhen, 2011. The reconstruction of cropland area and its spatial distribution pattern in the mid-northern Song Dynasty. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(11): 1531–1539. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  54. He H S, Mladenhoff D J, Sickley T A et al., 2000. GIS interpolations of witness tree records (1839–1866) for northern Wisconsin at multiple scales. Journal of Biogeography, 27(4): 1031–1042.Google Scholar
  55. Hjelle K L, 1997. Relationships between pollen and plants in human-influenced vegetation types using presence-absence data in western Norway. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 99(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
  56. Houghton R A, 2003. Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000. Tellus, Series B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 55(2): 378–390.Google Scholar
  57. Hu Ningke, Li Xin, 2012. A review of research methods of historical land use change. Advances in Earth Science, 27(7): 758–768. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  58. Huston M A, 2005. The three phases of land-use change: Implications for biodiversity. Ecological Applications, 15(6): 1864–1878.Google Scholar
  59. Jackson S T, Overpeck J T, Keattch S E et al., 1997. Mapped plant-macrofossil and pollen records of late Quaternary vegetation change in eastern North America. Quaternary Science Reviews, 16(1): 1–70.Google Scholar
  60. Jones K B, Neale A C, Nash M S et al., 2001. Predicting nutrient sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: A multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic region. Landscape Ecology, 16(4): 301–312.Google Scholar
  61. Jönsson M T, Fraver S, Jonsson B G, 2009. Forest history and the development of old-growth characteristics in fragmented boreal forests. Journal of Vegetation Science, 20(1): 91–106.Google Scholar
  62. Kaplan J O, Krumhardt K M, Zimmermann N E, 2012. The effects of land use and climate change on the carbon cycle of Europe over the past 500 years. Global Change Biology, 18(3): 902–914.Google Scholar
  63. Kearney M S, Grace R E, Stevenson J C, 1988. Marsh loss in Nanticoke Estuary, Chesapeake Bay. Geographical Review, 78: 205–220.Google Scholar
  64. Kienast F, 1993. Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a Geographical Information System: A methodological outline. Landscape Ecology, 8(2): 103–118.Google Scholar
  65. Leemans R, Goldewijk K K, Oldfield F, 2000. Developing a fast-track global database of land-cover history. LUCC Newsletter, (5): 6–7.Google Scholar
  66. Li Jianyong, Xu Qinghai, Gaillard-Lemdahl M J et al., 2013. Modern pollen and land-use relationships in the Taihang Mountains, Hebei province, northern China: A first step towards quantitative reconstruction of human-induced land cover changes. Veget Hist Archaeobot, 22: 463–477.Google Scholar
  67. Lin Qing, Luo Geping, Chen Xi, 2005. Review of land-use model. Progress in Geography, 24(5): 79–87. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  68. Liu Jiyuan, 1996. Resources Macro-scale Survey and Dynamics in China. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  69. Liu Jiyuan, Liu Mingliang, Zhuang Dafang et al., 2002. The recent spatial pattern of land use change in China. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 32(12): 1031–1040. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  70. Lv Yan, 2012. The spatial reconstruction of land use/land cover in the early reclaimed time of the western Jilin Province. Changchun: Jilin University. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  71. Lv Yan, Zhang Shuwen, Yang Jiuchun, 2010. Application of toponymy to the historical LUCC researches in Northeast China: Taking Zhenlai county of Jilin province as an example. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 12(2): 174–179. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  72. Mao Zilong, 2010. The research on land use/land cover change and soil organic carbon pool in Baicheng city during 1890–2029. Changchun: Jilin University. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  73. Marcucci D J, 2000. Landscape history as a planning tool. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49(1): 67–81.Google Scholar
  74. McLure J T, Geoffrey G H, 2002. Historic landscape reconstruction and visualisation, West Oxfordshire, England. Transactions in GIS, 6(1): 69–78.Google Scholar
  75. Motzkin G, Eberhardt R, Hall B et al., 2002. Vegetation variation across Cape Cod, Massachusetts: Environmental and historical determinants. Journal of Biogeography, 29(10/11): 1439–1454.Google Scholar
  76. Nielsen A B, Odgaard B, 2004. The use of historical analogues for interpreting fossil pollen records. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 13(1): 33–43.Google Scholar
  77. Parker D C, Manson S M, Janssen M A et al., 2003. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(2): 314–337.Google Scholar
  78. Pearson S G, Turner M G, Drake J B, 1999. Landscape change and habitat availability in the southern Appalachian highlands and Olympic peninsula. Ecological Applications, 9(4): 1288–1304.Google Scholar
  79. Perks R, Thomson A, 1998. The Oral History Reader. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  80. Petek F, Urbanc M, 2004. The Franziscean land cadastre as a key to understanding the 19th-century cultural landscape in Slovenia. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 44(1): 89–113.Google Scholar
  81. Petit C C, Lambin E F, 2002. Long-term land-cover changes in the Belgian Ardennes (1775-1929): Model-based reconstruction vs. Historical maps. Global Change Biology, 8(7): 616–630.Google Scholar
  82. Pontius Jr R G, Agrawal A, Huffaker D, 2003. Estimating the uncertainty of land-cover extrapolations while constructing a raster map from tabular data. Journal of Geographical Systems, 5(3): 253–273.Google Scholar
  83. Pontius Jr R G, Cornell J D, Hall C A S, 2001. Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with GEOMOD2: Application and validation for Costa Rica. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 85(1): 191–203.Google Scholar
  84. Poska A, Sepp E, Veski S et al., 2008. Using quantitative pollen-based land-cover estimations and a spatial CA_Markov model to reconstruct the development of cultural landscape at Rõuge, South Estonia. Veget Hist Archaeobot, 17: 527–541.Google Scholar
  85. Ramankutty N, Foley J A, 1999a. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 13(4): 997–1027.Google Scholar
  86. Ramankutty N, Foley J A, 1999b. Estimating historical changes in land cover: North American croplands form 1850–1992. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 8(5): 381–396.Google Scholar
  87. Russell E W B, 1997. People and the Land through Time: Linking Ecology and History. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Sala O E, Chapin F S, Armesto J J et al., 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287(5459): 1770–1774.Google Scholar
  89. Sarmaja-Korjonen K, 1992. Fine-interval pollen and charcoal analyses as tracers of early clearance periods in S Finland. Acta Botanica Fennica, 146: 1–75.Google Scholar
  90. Scharf E A, 2010. Archaeology, land use, pollen and restoration in the Yazoo Basin (Mississippi, USA). Veget Hist Archaeobot, 19: 159–175.Google Scholar
  91. Schiefer E, Gilbert R, 2007. Reconstructing morphometric change in a proglacial landscape using historical aerial photography and automated DEM generation. Geomorphology, 88(1): 167–178.Google Scholar
  92. Schneider N, Eugster W, 2007. Climatic impacts of historical wetland drainage in Switzerland. Climatic Change, 80(3/4): 301–321.Google Scholar
  93. Schulte L A, Mladenoff D J, 2001. The original U.S. Public Land Survey Records: Their use and limitations in reconstructing presettlement vegetation. Journal of Forestry, 99(10): 5–10.Google Scholar
  94. Schulte L A, Mladenoff D J, Nordheim E V, 2002. Quantitative classification of a historic northern Wisconsin (U.S.A.) landscape: Mapping forests at regional scales. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32(9): 1616–1638.Google Scholar
  95. Sinclair A R E, Hik D S, Schmitz O J et al., 1995. Biodiversity and the need for habitat renewal. Ecological Applications, 5: 579–587.Google Scholar
  96. Skaloš J, 2007. Czech and Swedish intensively utilised agricultural landscape-parallels and divergences during the last 300 years. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 0: 135–162.Google Scholar
  97. Skaloš J, Engstova B, 2010. Methodology for mapping non-forest wood elements using historic cadastral maps and aerial photographs as a basis for management. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(4): 831–843.Google Scholar
  98. Skaloš J, Weber M, Lipský Z et al., 2011. Using old military survey maps and orthophotograph maps to analyse long-term land cover changes: Case study (Czech Republic). Applied Geography, 31(2): 426–438.Google Scholar
  99. Sklenicka P, Molnarova K, Bravec E et al., 2009. Remnants of medieval field patterns in the Czech Republic: Analysis of driving forces behind their disappearance with special attention to the role of hedgerows. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 129(4): 465–473.Google Scholar
  100. Stäuble S, Martin S, Reynard E, 2008. Historical mapping for landscape reconstruction: examples from the Canton of Valais (Switzerland). Mountain Mapping and Visualisation, 211–217.Google Scholar
  101. Sugita S, 1994. Pollen representation of vegetation in Quaternary sediments: Theory and method in patchy vegetation. Journal of Ecology, 82: 881–897.Google Scholar
  102. Swetnam T W, Allen C D, Betancourt J L, 1999. Applied historical ecology: Using the past to manage for the future. Ecological Applications, 9(4): 1189–1206.Google Scholar
  103. Thompson L G, Davis M E, Mosley-Thompson E et al., 1998. A 25 000-year tropical climate history from Bolivian ice cores. Science, 282: 1858–1864.Google Scholar
  104. Trpák P, Trpáková I, 2002. Landscape function analysis based on evaluation of indicator maps and sketches of stable cadastre maps, Krajina 2002 Odpoznanik integraci, Ustinad Labem, 85–91.Google Scholar
  105. Turner B L, Lambin E F, Reenberg A, 2007. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(52): 20666–20671.Google Scholar
  106. Van Dyke E, Wasson K, 2005. Historical ecology of a central California estuary: 150 years of habitat change. Estuaries, 28(2): 173–189.Google Scholar
  107. Veldkamp A, Lambin E F, 2001 Editorial: Predicting land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 85: 1–6.Google Scholar
  108. Wear D N, Bolstad P V, 1998. Land-use changes in Southern Appalachian landscapes: Spatial analysis and forecast evaluation. Ecosystems, 1(6): 575–594.Google Scholar
  109. White M A, Mladenoff D J, 1994. Old-growth forest landscape transitions from pre-European settlement to present. Landscape Ecology, 9(3): 191–205.Google Scholar
  110. Whitney G G, 1996. From Coastal Wilderness to Fruited Plain: A History of Environmental Change in Temperate North America from 1500 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Williams J H, 2007. The Archeolgoy of Kent to AD 800 (Vol.8). Boydell Press, 304.Google Scholar
  112. Wulf M, Sommer M, Schmidt R, 2010. Forest cover changes in the Prignitz region (NE Germany) between 1790 and 1960 in relation to soils and other driving forces. Landscape Ecology, 25(2): 299–313.Google Scholar
  113. Wulf M, Rujner H, 2011. A GIS-based method for the reconstruction of the late eighteenth century forest vegetation in the Prignitz region (NE Germany). Landscape Ecology, 26(2): 153–168.Google Scholar
  114. Ye Yu, Fang Xiuqi, Ren Yuyu et al., 2009. Arable land change in Northeast China over the past 300 years. Science in China, 39(3): 340–350. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  115. Yuan Yujiang, 1989. Reconstruct and forecast by the fodder grass output on the northern slope of Mount Tian tree-ring chronologies. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 3(1): 81–89.Google Scholar
  116. Zhang Shuwen, Zhang Yangzhen, Li Ying et al., 2006. Study on the Spatial Characteristics of Land Use/Cover Change in Northeast China. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  117. Zhang Xuezhen, Wang Wei-chyung, Fang Xiuqi et al., 2011a. Vegetation of Northeast China during the late seventeenth to early twentieth century as revealed by historical documents. Regional Environmental Change, 11(4): 869–882.Google Scholar
  118. Zhang Xuezhen, Wang Wei-chyung, Fang Xiuqi et al., 2011b. Natural vegetation pattern over Northeast China in late 17th century. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 31(2): 184–189. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  119. Zhu Feng, Cui Xuefeng, Miao Lijuan, 2012. China’s spatially-explicit historical land-use data and its reconstruction methodology. Progress in Geography, 31(2): 1563–1573. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuanyuan Yang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Shuwen Zhang
    • 2
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jiuchun Yang
    • 2
  • Liping Chang
    • 2
  • Kun Bu
    • 2
  • Xiaoshi Xing
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Earth ScienceJilin UniversityChangchunChina
  2. 2.Northeast Institute of Geography and AgroecologyCASChangchunChina
  3. 3.Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN)Columbia UniversityPalisadesUSA

Personalised recommendations