Advertisement

Journal of Geographical Sciences

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 159–176 | Cite as

Urban carbon footprint and carbon cycle pressure: The case study of Nanjing

  • Rongqin Zhao
  • Xianjin Huang
  • Ying Liu
  • Taiyang Zhong
  • Minglei Ding
  • Xiaowei Chuai
Article

Abstract

Urban carbon footprint reflects the impact and pressure of human activities on urban environment. Based on city level, this paper estimated carbon emissions and carbon footprint of Nanjing city, analyzed urban carbon footprint intensity and carbon cycle pressure and discussed the influencing factors of carbon footprint through LMDI decomposition model. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) The total carbon emissions of Nanjing increased rapidly since 2000, in which the carbon emission from the use of fossil energy was the largest. Meanwhile, carbon sinks of Nanjing presented a declining trend since 2000, which caused the decrease of carbon compensation rate and the increase of urban carbon cycle pressure. (2) The total carbon footprint of Nanjing increased rapidly since 2000, and the carbon deficit was more than ten times of total land areas of Nanjing in 2009, which means Nanjing confronted high carbon cycle pressure. (3) Generally, carbon footprint intensity of Nanjing was on decrease and the carbon footprint productivity was on increase. This indicated that energy utilization rate and carbon efficiency of Nanjing was improved since 2000, and the policy for energy conservation and emission reduction taken by Nanjing’s government received better effects. (4) Economic development, population and industrial structure are promoting factors for the increase of carbon footprint of Nanjing, while the industrial carbon footprint intensity was inhibitory factor. (5) Several countermeasures should be taken to decrease urban carbon footprint and alleviate carbon cycle pressure, such as: improvement of the energy efficiency, industrial structure reconstruction, afforestation and environmental protection and land use control. Generally, transition to low-carbon economy is essential for Chinese cities to realize sustainable development in the future.

Keywords

carbon footprint carbon cycle pressure LMDI Nanjing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adom F, Maes A, Workman C et al., 2012. Regional carbon footprint analysis of dairy feeds for milk production in the USA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17: 520–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aichele R, Felbermayr G, 2012. Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63: 336–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakhshi A A, Demonsabert S M, 2012. Estimating the carbon footprint of the municipal water cycle. Journal American Water Works Association, 104: 81–82.Google Scholar
  4. Chang N B, Qi C, Yang Y J, 2012. Optimal expansion of a drinking water infrastructure system with respect to carbon footprint, cost-effectiveness and water demand. Journal of Environmental Management, 110: 194–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng K, Pan G X, Smith P et al., 2011. Carbon footprint of China’s crop production: An estimation using agro-statistics data over 1993–2007. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 142: 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chuai X W, Lai L, Huang X J et al., 2012. Temporospatial changes of carbon footprint based on energy consumption in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 22(1): 110–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duan X N, Wang X K, Lu F et al., 2008 Carbon sequestration and its potential by wetland ecosystems in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(2): 463–469. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fan J, Guo, X M, Marinova D et al., 2012. Embedded carbon footprint of Chinese urban households: Structure and changes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 33: 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang J Y, Liu G H, Xu S L, 1996. Carbon cycle and its global meaning of terrestrial ecosystem in China. In: Wang G C, Wen Y P. The Measurement of Greenhouse Gases and Their Release and Related Processes. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 129–139. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Filimonau V, Dickinson J, Robbins D et al., 2011. Reviewing the carbon footprint analysis of hotels: Life Cycle Energy Analysis (LCEA) as a holistic method for carbon impact appraisal of tourist accommodation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19: 1917–1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Global Footprint Network, 2012. Ecological Footprint Glossary. http://www.footprintnetwork.org/gfn_sub.php?content=glossary.Google Scholar
  12. Guan D S, Chen Y J, Huang F F, 1998. The storage and distribution of carbon in urban vegetation and its roles in balance and oxygen in Guangzhou. China Environmental Science, 18(5): 437–441. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. IPCC, 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.Google Scholar
  14. Kenny T, Gray N F, 2009. Comparative performance of six carbon footprint models for use in Ireland. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li K R, 2000. Land Use Change, Net Emission of Greenhouse Gases and the Carbon Cycle in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 260. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Pattara C, Raggi A, Cichelli A, 2012. Life cycle assessment and carbon footprint in the wine supply-chain. Environmental Management, 49: 1247–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schulz N B, 2010. Delving into the carbon footprints of Singapore: Comparing direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions of a small and open economic system. Energy Policy, 38: 4848–4855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sovacool B K, Brown M A, 2010. Twelve metropolitan carbon footprints: A preliminary comparative global assessment. Energy Policy, 38: 4856–4869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Strohbach M W, Arnold E, Haase D, 2012. The carbon footprint of urban green space: A life cycle approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104: 220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Teodoru C R, Bastien J, Bonneville M C et al., 2012. The net carbon footprint of a newly created boreal hydroelectric reservoir. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 26, doi: 10.1029/2011GB004187.Google Scholar
  21. Wells J R, Boucher J F, Laurent A B et al., 2012. Carbon footprint assessment of a paperback book: Can planned integration of deinked market pulp be detrimental to climate? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16: 212–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wiedmann T, Minx J, 2007. A Definition of Carbon Footprint. http://www.censa.org.uk/docs/ISA-UK_Report_07-01_carbon_footprint.pdf.Google Scholar
  23. World Wildlife Fund, 2008. Living Planet Report 2008. www.panda.org.Google Scholar
  24. Xie H Y, Chen X S, Lin K R, 2008. The ecological footprint analysis of fossil energy and electricity. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(4): 1729–1735. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. Ye D Z, Chen P Q, 1992. Study on Prediction of Global Change in China (2nd Part). Beijing: Earthquake Press, 232–245. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Zhao R Q, Huang X J, Peng B Z, 2012. Research on carbon cycle and carbon balance of Nanjing urban system. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(6): 758–770. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  27. Zhao R Q, Huang X J, Zhong T Y et al., 2011. Carbon footprint of different industrial spaces based on energy consumption in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 21(2): 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rongqin Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xianjin Huang
    • 1
  • Ying Liu
    • 3
  • Taiyang Zhong
    • 1
  • Minglei Ding
    • 2
  • Xiaowei Chuai
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Geographic and Oceanographic SciencesNanjing UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.College of Resources and EnvironmentNorth China University of Water Resources and Electric PowerZhengzhouChina
  3. 3.College of Civil Construction EngineeringZhengzhou Institute of Aeronautical Industry ManagementZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations