Correction to: Acta Geotechnica (2023) 18:3005–3025 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01764-6

In the original publication of the article figures 5, 6 and 18 have been published incorrectly. The correct figures are given below. The original article is corrected.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Plot of the CStaD loading-unloading potential pairs in axial stress radial stress space for \({p}_{c}=400 kPa\) and \({C}_{N}=3\)

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Plots of the CStaD plastic potential curves in s-t space for \({C}_{N}=3\). Geometric interpretation of dilatancy angle, identification of dilative and contractive regions. The solid lines are for shear loading (mobilizing away from stress isotropy) and the dotted lines are for shear unloading (mobilizing towards stress isotropy)

Full size image
Fig. 18
figure 18

GCStaD plastic potential curves described by Equation (65). Considering the likeness of the geometric form with the fish curve, the tails (broken lines) are valid for unloading in shear and manifest when the stress state mobilizes towards isotropic stress state and CS is phase transformation /critical state line. Both the unloading and the loading plastic potential curves are continued to space defined by \(-{q}/{C}_{M}^{\theta}\)

Full size image