Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inherent and stress-induced stiffness anisotropy of natural granite residual soil

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because of the weathering pedogenesis of natural granite residual soil (GRS), its mechanical responses are dominated by the parent rock and weathering process, a situation that differs fundamentally from that of sedimentary soil. Natural GRS is characterized by inherent anisotropy and anisotropic in situ stress conditions, but how this affects its stiffness behavior is not well understood. In this study, systematic bender-element and modified Hardin-type resonant-column tests were performed under various stress conditions (isotropic or anisotropic), thereby enabling the shear wave velocities and shear modulus in different directions to be measured. The degree of inherent stiffness anisotropy of natural GRS is quantified and compared with those of well-studied soils. Natural GRS is found to have apparent stiffness anisotropy, with the shear wave velocity in the vertical direction being higher than that in the horizontal direction. This unique stiffness anisotropy behavior can be attributed to the unique structural characteristics of natural GRS, in which cementation and minor fissures play important roles. Under stress anisotropy, natural GRS has the same shear wave velocity hierarchy as that under isotropic conditions, but vertical loading alters the soil structure as reflected by the change of soil fabric constants. In addition, a higher stress ratio corresponds to a larger shear modulus of both natural and reconstituted GRS, but it affects them differently, with cementation again playing an important role. This study provides a fundamental dataset regarding the stiffness anisotropy of natural residual soil and improves the understanding of its stiffness behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Allen JC, Stokoe KH (1982) Development of resonant column apparatus with anisotropic loading. Civil Engineering Department, University of Texas, Geotechnical Engineering Center

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bayat M, Ghalandarzadeh A (2020) Modified models for predicting dynamic properties of granular soil under anisotropic consolidation. Int J Geomech 20(3):04019197. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brosse AM, Jardine RJ, Nishimura S (2017) The undrained shear strength anisotropy of four Jurassic to Eocene stiff clays. Géotechnique 67(8):653–671. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Callisto L, Rampello S (2002) Shear strength and small-strain stiffness of a natural clay under general stress conditions. Géotechnique 52(8):547–560. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2002.52.8.547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clayton CRI, Priest JA, Bui M, Zervos A, Kim SG (2009) The Stokoe resonant column apparatus: effects of stiffness, mass and specimen fixity. Géotechnique 59(5):429–437. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.00096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fioravante V (2000) Anisotropy of small strain stiffness of Ticino and Kenya sands from seismic wave propagation measured in triaxial testing. Soils Found 40(4):129–142. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.40.4_129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gasparre A, Nishimura S, Minh NA, Coop MR, Jardine RL (2007) The stiffness of natural London Clay. Géotechnique 57(1):33–47. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.57.1.33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gasparre A, Nishimura S, Coop MR, Jardine RL (2007) The influence of structure on the behaviour of London Clay. Géotechnique 57(1):19–31. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.57.1.19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gu XQ, Li YH, Hu J, Shi ZH, Liang FY, Huang MS (2022) Elastic shear stiffness anisotropy and fabric anisotropy of natural clays. Acta Geotech 17:3229–3243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01468-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hardin BO, Drnevich VP (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves. J Soil Mech Found Div 98(7):667–692. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hight DW, Bennel JD, Chana B, Davis PD, Jardine RJ, Porovic E (1997) Wave velocity and stiffness measurements of the Crag and Lower London Tertiaries at Sizewell. Géotechnique 47(3):451–474. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.3.451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hosseini Kamal R (2012). Experimental study of the geotechnical properties of UK mudrocks. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London, London, UK

  13. Hossain MA, Yin JH (2010) Shear strength and dilative characteristics of an unsaturated compacted completely decomposed granite soil. Can Geotech J 47(10):1112–1216. https://doi.org/10.1139/t10-015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim T, Finno RJ (2012) Anisotropy evolution and irrecoverable deformation in triaxial stress probes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138(2):155–165. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li H, He H, Senetakis K (2018) Calibration exercise of a Hardin-type resonant column. Géotechnique 68(2):171–176. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Q, Ng CWW, Liu GB (2012) Determination of small-strain stiffness of Shanghai clay on prismatic soil specimen. Canadian Geotech J 49(8):986–993. https://doi.org/10.1139/t2012-050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jafarian Y, Javdanian H, Haddad A (2018) Dynamic properties of calcareous and siliceous sands under isotropic and anisotropic stress conditions. Soils Found 58(1):172–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2017.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jamiolkowski M, Lancellotta R, Lo Presti DCF (1995) Remarks on the stiffness at small strains of six Italian clays. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Prefailure Deformation of Geomaterials, Shibuya et al (eds), Sapporo, Japan, 2: 817–836

  19. Jardine RJ, Kuwano R, Zdravković L, Thornton C (1999) Some fundamental aspects of the pre-failure behaviour of granular soils. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Prefailure Deformation of Geomaterials, Jamiolkowski et al (eds), Torino, Italy, CRC Press, 2: 1077–1111

  20. Jovičić V, Coop MP (1998) The measurement of stiffness anisotropy in clays with bender element tests in the triaxial apparatus. Geotech Test J 21(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10419J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuwano R, Connolly TM, Kuwano J (1999) Shear stiffness anisotropy measured by multi-directional bender element transducers. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Prefailure Deformation of Geomaterials, Jamiolkowski et al (eds), Torino, Italy, CRC Press, 1: 205–212

  22. Ladd RS (1978) Preparing test specimens using undercompaction. Geotech Test J 1(1):16–23. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10364J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu XY, Zhang XW, Kong LW, Li XM, Wang G (2021) Effect of cementation on the small-strain stiffness of granite residual soil. Soils Found 61(2):520–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2021.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu XY, Zhang XW, Kong LW, An R, Xu GF (2021) Effect of inherent anisotropy on the strength of natural granite residual soil under generalized stress paths. Acta Geotech 16:3793–3812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01393-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu XY, Zhang XW, Kong LW, Wang G, Liu HH (2022) Formation mechanism of collapsing gully in southern China and the relationship with granite residual soil: a geotechnical perspective. CATENA 210(3):105890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu XY, Zhang XW, Kong LW, Chen C, Yin S (2023) Influence of Intermediate Principal Stress on Shear Strength of Natural Granite Residual Soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 149(5):06023003. https://doi.org/10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-10511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu XY, Zhang XW, Kong LW, Wang G, Li CS (2023) Multiscale structural characterizations of anisotropic natural granite residual soil. Can Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2022-0188(inpress)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lo KY, Leonards GA, Yuen C (1977) Interpretation and significance of anisotropic deformation behavior of soft clays, Norvegian Geotechnical Institute (No. Report No. 117 Monog Ser.)

  29. Lunne T, Powell JJ, Robertson PK (2002) Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. CRC Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Marchetti S (1980) In-situ tests by flat dilatometer. ASCE J Geotech Eng Div 106(GT3):299–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(80)90781-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mayne PW, Kulhawy FH (1990) Direct and indirect determinations of in situ K0 in clays. Transport Res Rec 1278:141–149

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mitaritonna G, Amorosi A, Cotecchia F (2014) Experimental investigation of the evolution of elastic stiffness anisotropy in a clayey soil. Géotechnique 64(6):463–475. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.13.P.191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ng CWW, Leung EH (2006) Small-strain stiffness of granitic and volcanic saprolites in Hong Kong. In: Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, 3:2507

  34. Ng CWW, Leung EH (2007) Determination of shear-wave velocities and shear moduli of completely decomposed tuff. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(6):630–640. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:6(630)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nishimura S (2006). Laboratory study on anisotropy of natural London Clay. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London, London, UK

  36. Nishio S, Katsura Y (1994) Shear wave anisotropy in Edogawa Pleistocene deposit In International symposium on pre-failure deformation characteristics of geomaterials. Balkema 1:169–174

    Google Scholar 

  37. Okewale IA, Coop MR (2020) A study of completely decomposed volcanic rocks with transitional mode of behaviour. Bull Eng Geol Env 79:4035–4050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01820-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Payan M, Khoshghalb A, Senetakis K, Khalili N (2016) Small-strain stiffness of sand subjected to stress anisotropy. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 88:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pennington DS, Nash DFT, Lings ML (1997) Anisotropy of G0 shear stiffness in Gault Clay. Géotechnique 47(3):391–398. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.3.391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pineda JA, Colmenares JE (2008) Anisotropy stiffness of unsaturated residual and saprolitic soils from a granodiorite, at very small strains. In: Deformational Characteristics of Geomaterials: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, 521–527

  41. Pineda JA, Colmenares JE, Hoyos LR (2014) Effect of fabric and weathering intensity on dynamic properties of residual and saprolitic soils via resonant column testing. Geotech Test J 37(5):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20120132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rahardjo H, Aung KK, Leong EC, Rezaur RB (2004) Characteristics of residual soils in Singapore as formed by weathering. Eng Geol 73:157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rampello S, Viggiani GMB, Amorosi A (1997) Small-strain stiffness of remolded clay compressed along constant triaxial effective stress ratio paths. Géotechnique 47(3):475–489. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1997.47.3.475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rinaldi VA, Santamarina JC (2008) Cemented soils: small strain stiffness. Deform Charact Geomater 1:267–273

    Google Scholar 

  45. Santamarina JC, Cascante G (1996) Stress anisotropy and wave propagation: a micromechanical view. Can Geotech J 33(5):770–782. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-102-323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Santos JA, Gomes Correia A (2000) Shear modulus of soils under cyclic loading at small and medium strain level. In 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand: 1–8

  47. Seed HB, Wong RT, Idriss IM, Tokimatsu K (1986) Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils. J Geotech Eng 112(11):1016–1032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:11(1016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shi J, Haegeman W, Cnudde V (2021) Anisotropic small-strain stiffness of calcareous sand affected by sample preparation, particle characteristic and gradation. Géotechnique 71(4):305–319. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.P.348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Stokoe KH II, Hwang SK, Lee JNK, Andrus RD (1995) Effects of various parameters on the stiffness and damping of soils at small to medium strains. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Prefailure Deformation of Geomaterials, Shibuya et al (eds), Sapporo, Japan, 2: 785–816

  50. Teachavorasinskun S, Lukkanaprasit P (2008) Stress induced and inherent anisotropy on elastic stiffness of soft clays. Soils Found 48(1):127–132. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.48.127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vaughan PR, Kwan CW (1984) Weathering, structure and in situ stress in residual soils. Géotechnique 34(1):43–59. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1984.34.1.43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Viggiani G, Atkinson JH (1995) Stiffness of fine-grained soil at very small strains. Géotechnique 45(2):249–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(96)86971-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J of Geotech Eng 117(1):89–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Watabe Y, Tanaka M, Tanaka H, Tsuchida T (2003) K0-consolidation in a triaxial cell and evaluation of in-situ K0 for marine clays with various characteristics. Soils Found 43(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.43.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Yimsiri S (2001) Pre-failure deformation characteristics of soils: anisotropy and soil fabric. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

  56. Zhang J, Andrus R, Hsein J (2005) Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(4):453–464. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:4(453)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang XW, Liu XY, Chen C, Kong LW, Wang G (2020) Engineering geology of residual soil derived from mudstone in Zimbabwe. Eng Geol 277:105785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang XW, Liu XY, An R, Li XM (2022) Site observations of weathered granitic soils subjected to cementation and partial drainage using SCPTU. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 15(4):984–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang XW, Liu XY, Kong LW, Chen C (2022) Role of free iron oxides in the physicochemical and mechanical properties of natural clay. Eng Geol 303:106665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Zuo L, Xu L, Baudet BA, Gao C, Huang C (2022) Small-strain shear stiffness anisotropy of a saturated clayey loess. Géotechnique (in press). https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.21.00179

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41972285, 42177148, and 12102312), Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hubei Province (2020CFA103), and CRSRI Open Research Program (CKWV2021884/KY), Key R & D projects of Hubei Province (2021BAA186) is thanked.

Funding

Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China, 41972285, Xianwei Zhang, 42177148, Xianwei Zhang, 12102312, Xianwei Zhang, Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hubei Province, 2020CFA103, Xianwei Zhang, CRSRI Open Research Program, CKWV2021884/KY, Xianwei Zhang, Key R & D projects of Hubei Province, 2021BAA186, Xianwei Zhang

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China

    Xinyu Liu, Xianwei Zhang, Lingwei Kong & Gang Wang

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Xinyu Liu & Gang Wang

  3. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, China

    Song Yin

Authors
  1. Xinyu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xianwei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lingwei Kong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Song Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianwei Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Zhang, X., Kong, L. et al. Inherent and stress-induced stiffness anisotropy of natural granite residual soil. Acta Geotech. 18, 5681–5699 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-02013-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-02013-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation