Skip to main content
Log in

Use of microfluidic experiments to optimize MICP treatment protocols for effective strength enhancement of MICP-treated sandy soils

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microbially induced calcium carbonate (CaCO3) precipitation (MICP) has been extensively studied for soil improvement in geotechnical engineering. The quantity and size of calcium carbonate crystals affect the strength of MICP-treated soil. In this study, microfluidic chip experiments and soil column experiments were conducted to optimize MICP treatment protocols for effective strength enhancement of MICP-treated sandy soils. The microscale experiments reveal that, due to Ostwald ripening, longer injection intervals allow crystals to dissolve and reprecipitate into larger crystals regardless of the concentration of cementation solution. Even though a cementation solution input rate of 0.042 mol/l/h is sufficient to maintain a high chemical transformation efficiency, a further reduction in the input rate by about four times resulted in an increase in the size of crystals produced by the end of treatment from about 40 to 60 μm. These findings were applied in soil column experiments. Results showed that significantly larger crystals and higher soil strength were achieved when the normalized rate of cementation solution injection was reduced from 0.042 to 0.021 mol/l/h. Crystal size and soil strength increased slightly more when the normalized input rate was further reduced from 0.021 to 0.010 mol/l/h. This study demonstrates how data from microscale microfluidic experiments that examine the effects of injection intervals and concentration of cementation solution on the properties of calcium carbonate crystals can be used to optimize MICP treatment in macroscale sand soil column experiments for effective strength enhancement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Figure10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASTM (1986) D2938:390-391: Standard test method of unconfined compressive strength of intact rock core specimens. In: 1995 Annual Book of ASTM standards. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

  2. ASTM (2004) D7012-14e1: Compressive strength and elastic moduli of intact rock core specimens under varying states of stress and temperatures. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

  3. ASTM (2014) D4373–14: Standard test method for rapid determination of carbonate content of soils. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

  4. Al Qabany A, Soga K (2013) Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils. Géotechnique 63(4):331–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Al Qabany A, Soga K, Santamarina C (2012) Factors affecting efficiency of microbially induced calcite precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138(8):992–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, Y., Gao, Y., Ng, C. W. W., & Guo, H. (2021). Bio-improved hydraulic properties of sand treated by soybean urease induced carbonate precipitation and its application Part 1: Water retention ability. Transp Geotech, 27(September 2020), 100489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100489

  7. Chen, Y., Gao, Y., & Guo, H. (2021). Bio-improved hydraulic properties of sand treated by soybean urease induced carbonate precipitation and its application Part 2: Sand-geotextile capillary barrier effect. Transp Geotech 27(September 2020), 100484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100484

  8. Cheng L, Cord-Ruwisch R (2012) In situ soil cementation with ureolytic bacteria by surface percolation. Ecol Eng 42:64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng L, Shahin MA, Mujah D (2017) Influence of key environmental conditions on microbially induced cementation for soil stabilization. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143(1):04016083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cui M-J, Zheng J-J, Zhang R-J, Lai H-J, Zhang J (2017) Influence of cementation level on the strength behaviour of bio-cemented sand. Acta Geotech 12(5):971–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. DeJong JT, Fritzges MB, Nüsslein K (2006) Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(11):1381–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DeJong JT, Mortensen BM, Martinez BC, Nelson DC (2010) Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol Eng 36(2):197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. DeJong JT, Soga K, Kavazanjian E, Burns S, Van Paassen LA, Al Qabany A, Aydilek A, Bang SS, Burbank M, Caslake LF, Chen CY, Cheng X, Chu J, Ciurli S, Esnault-Filet A, Fauriel S, Hamdan N, Hata T, Inagaki Y, Jefferis S, Kuo M, Laloui L, Larrahondo J, Manning DAC, Martinez B, Montoya BM, Nelson DC, Palomino A, Renforth P, Santamarina JC, Seagren EA, Tanyu B, Tsesarsky M, Weaver T (2013) Biogeochemical processes and geotechnical applications: progress, opportunities and challenges. Géotechnique 63(4):287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dhami NK, Reddy MS, Mukherjee A (2013) Biomineralization of calcium carbonates and their engineered applications: a review. Front Microbiol 4(October):314

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gomez MG, Martinez BC, DeJong JT, Hunt CE, deVlaming L, A., Major, David W., Dworatzek, Sandra M, (2015) Field-scale bio-cementation tests to improve sands. Ground Improvement 168(3):206–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang NJ, Soga K, Kuo M (2017) Microbially induced carbonate precipitation for seepage-induced internal erosion control in sand-clay mixtures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143(3):04016100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim D H, Mahabadi N, Jang J and van Paassen L A (2020). Assessing the kinetics and pore‐scale characteristics of biological calcium carbonate precipitation in porous media using a microfluidic chip experiment. Water Resour Res, 56, e2019WR025420.

  18. Konstantinou C, Biscontin G (2021) Soil enhancement via microbially induced calcite precipitation. In: Geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground. CRC Press, pp 765–772. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429321559

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Konstantinou C, Biscontin G, Jiang NJ, Soga K (2021) Application of microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) to form bio-cemented artificial sandstone. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Konstantinou C, Wang Y, Biscontin G, Soga K (2021) The role of bacterial urease activity on the uniformity of carbonate precipitation profiles of bio-treated coarse sand specimens. Sci Rep 11:6161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85712-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Konstantinou C, Biscontin G, Logothetis F (2021) Tensile strength of artificially cemented sandstone generated via microbially induced carbonate precipitation. Materials 14(16):4735. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lai HJ, Cui MJ, Wu SF, Yang Y, Chu J (2021) Retarding effect of concentration of cementation solution on biocementation of soil. Acta Geotech 16(5):1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01149-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin H, Suleiman MT, Brown DG, Kavazanjian E Jr (2015) Mechanical behavior of sands treated by microbially induced carbonate precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 142:04015066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mahawish A, Bouazza A, Gates WP (2018) Improvement of coarse sand engineering properties by microbially induced calcite precipitation. Geomicrobiol J 35(10):887–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martinez BC, DeJong JT, Ginn TR, Montoya BM, Barkouki TH, Hunt C, Tanyu B, Major D (2013) Experimental optimization of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation for soil improvement. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139:587–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Phillips AJ, Lauchnor E, Eldring J, Esposito R, Mitchell AC, Gerlach R, Spangler LH (2013) Potential CO2 leakage reduction through biofilm-induced calcium carbonate precipitation. Environ Sci Technol 47(1):142–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Terzis D, Bernier-Latmani R, Laloui L (2016) Fabric characteristics and mechanical response of bio-improved sand to various treatment conditions. Géotech Lett 69(1):50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Terzis D, Laloui L (2018) 3-D micro-architecture and mechanical response of soil cemented via microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Sci Rep 8(1):1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Terzis, Dimitrios and Laloui, Lyesse. 2019. A decade of progress and turning points in the understanding of bio-improved soils: a review. Geomech Energy Environ 19: 100116.

  30. van Paassen L (2009) Biogrout: ground improvement by microbially induced carbonate precipitation. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology.

  31. van Paassen L, Ghose R, van der Linden TJM, van der StarWRL and van Loosdrecht MCM, (2010) Quantifying biomediated ground improvement by ureolysis: large-scale biogrout experiment. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(12):1721–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Y, Soga K, DeJong JT, Kabla A (2019) A microfluidic chip and its use in characterizing the particle-scale behaviour of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP). Géotechnique 69(12):1086–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Y, Soga K, DeJong JT, Kabla A (2019) Microscale visualization of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) processes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 145(9):04019045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang Y, Soga K and Jiang NJ (2017) Microbial induced carbonate precipitation (MICP): the case for microscale perspective. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, 1099–1102.

  35. Wang Y, Soga K, DeJong JT and Kabla A. (2021) Forthcoming. Effects of bacterial density on growth rate and characteristics of microbial-induced CaCO3 precipitates: a particle-scale experimental study. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng.https://doi.org/10.1016/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002509

  36. Weinhardt F, Class H, Vahid Dastjerdi S, Karadimitriou N, Lee D, Steeb H (2021) Experimental methods and imaging for enzymatically induced calcite precipitation in a microfluidic Cell. Water Resour Res 57(3):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Whiffin VS, van Paassen LA, Harkes MP (2007) Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvementtechnique. Geomicrobiol J 24(5):417–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Whitesides GM (2006) The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442(7101):368–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xiao Y, He X, Wu W, Stuedlein AW, Evans TM, Chu J, Liu H, van Paassen LA, Wu H (2021) Kinetic biomineralization through microfluidic chip tests. Acta Geotech 16(10):3229–3237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01205-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zehner J, Røyne A, Sikorski P (2021) A sample cell for the study of enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation at the grain-scale and its implications for biocementation. Sci Rep 11(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92235-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zehner J, Røyne A, Wentzel A, Sikorski P (2020) Microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation: an experimental toolbox forin situand real time investigation of micro-scale pH evolution. RSC Adv 10(35):20485–20493. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra03897k

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhao Q, Li L, Li C, Li M, Amini F, Zhang H (2014) Factors affecting improvement of engineering properties of MICP-treated soil catalyzed by bacteria and urease. J Mater Civ Eng 26(12):04014094. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou H, Xu S, Sun Z (2018) Real-time in situ observation of shear modulus evolution during Ostwald ripening of colloidal crystallization. J Cryst Growth 502(June):35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Y.W. acknowledges the support of the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52171262, 42141003), Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Shenzhen (Grant No. JCYJ20210324103812033) and Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou, Grant No. K19313901) for conducting this study. The authors would also like to acknowledge Dr. Fedir Kiskin for proofreading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuze Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Konstantinou, C., Soga, K. et al. Use of microfluidic experiments to optimize MICP treatment protocols for effective strength enhancement of MICP-treated sandy soils. Acta Geotech. 17, 3817–3838 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01478-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01478-9

Keywords

Navigation