Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pseudo-dynamic stability of rock slope considering Hoek–Brown strength criterion

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rock slopes with planar joints or weak structural planes are vulnerable in nature, especially suffering from the natural hazards, instabilities of slopes are more prone to occur. Therefore, concerning to the influence of earthquakes, this paper performs a new procedure to evaluate slope stability in a geomaterial governed by Hoek–Brown strength criterion. A rotational failure mechanism determined by 21 dependent angle variables is introduced to respect the Hoek–Brown strength criterion. The earthquake load is characterized by a modified pseudo-dynamic method that does not violate the zero boundary condition and considers the damping properties of geomaterials. A slice approach is adopted to calculate the earthquake-induced inertial force work rate. The stability number of rock slope is considered to measure the safety. The stability number is formulated as a classical optimization problem controlled by 21 dependent angle variables and a time variable which need to be optimized by the genetic algorithm toolbox. Comparisons with the literature are made to prove rationality and accuracy of the proposed procedure. Parametric study is carried out to reveal the influence of dynamic properties. For engineering application, stability charts are provided for a quick assessment of slope safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker R (2003) Inter-relations between experimental and computational aspects of slope stability analysis. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 27(5):379–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellezza I (2014) A new pseudo-dynamic approach for seismic active soil thrust. Geotech Geol Eng 32(2):561–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonilla-Sierra V, Scholtes L, Donze FV, Elmouttie MK (2015) Rock slope stability analysis using photogrammetric data and DFN–DEM modelling. Acta Geotech 10(4):497–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cen DF, Huang D, Ren F (2017) Shear deformation and strength of the interphase between the soil-rock mixture and the benched bedrock slope surface. Acta Geotech 12(2):391–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deng DP (2020) Limit equilibrium solution for the rock slope stability under the coupling effect of the shear dilatancy and strain softening. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 134:104–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dong S, Feng WK, Yin YB, Hu R, Dai HC, Zhang GQ (2020) Calculating the permanent displacement of a rock slope based on the shear characteristics of a structural plane under cyclic loading. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53(10):4583–4598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghosh P, Kolathayar S (2011) Seismic passive earth pressure behind non vertical wall with composite failure mechanism: pseudo-dynamic approach. Geotech Geol Eng 29(3):363–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghosh S (2010) Pseudo-dynamic active force and pressure behind battered retaining wall supporting inclined backfill. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(11):1226–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. He Y, Liu Y, Hazarika H, Yuan R (2019) Stability analysis of seismic slopes with tensile strength cut-off. Comput Geotech 112:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. J Geotech Eng Div 106(9):1013–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek–Brown failure criterion-2002 edition. Proc NARMS-Tac 1:267–273

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Pearson, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar P (1998) Shear failure envelope of Hoek–Brown criterion for rockmass. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol 13(4):453–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Michalowski RL, Park D (2020) Stability assessment of slopes in rock governed by the Hoek–Brown strength criterion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 127:104–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nimbalkar SS, Choudhury D, Mandal JN (2006) Seismic stability of reinforced-soil wall by pseudo-dynamic method. Geosynth Int 13(3):111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pan QJ, Jiang YJ, Dias D (2017) Probabilistic stability analysis of a three-dimensional rock slope characterized by the Hoek–Brown failure criterion. J Comput Civ Eng 31(5):04017046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pan QJ, Dias D, Sun Z (2017) A new approach for incorporating Hoek–Brown failure criterion in kinematic approach-case of a rock slope. Int J Struct Stabil Dyn 17(7):177–1008

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Qin CB, Chian SC (2017) Kinematic analysis of seismic slope stability with a discretisation technique and pseudo-dynamic approach: a new perspective. Géotechnique 68(6):492–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qin CB, Chian SC (2018) Seismic ultimate bearing capacity of a Hoek–Brown rock slope using discretization-based kinematic analysis and pseudodynamic methods. Int J Geomech 18(6):04018054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Qin CB, Chian SC (2018) Seismic bearing capacity of non-uniform soil slopes using discretization-based kinematic analysis considering rayleigh waves. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 109:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Song DQ, Liu XL, Li B, Zhang J, Bastos JJV (2021) Assessing the influence of a rapid water drawdown on the seismic response characteristics of a reservoir rock slope using time-frequency analysis. Acta Geotech 16(4):1281–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Steedman RS, Zeng X (1990) The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall. Géotechnique 40(1):103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun ZB, Li JF, Pan QJ (2018) Discrete kinematic mechanism for nonhomogeneous slopes and its application. Int J Geomech 18(2):04018171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun ZB, Shu X, Dias D (2019) Stability analysis for nonhomogeneous slopes subjected to water drawdown. J Central South Univ 26(7):1719–1734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang XL, Li L, Yin JH (2004) Seismic and static stability analysis for rock slopes by a kinematical approach. Géotechnique 54(8):543–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Fundamental Research Funds for the central universities of Central South University (2020zzts642). The financial supports are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-Li Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

$$C_{{\text{S}}} = \cos \left( {y_{{{\text{s}}1}} } \right)\cosh \left( {y_{{{\text{s2}}}} } \right)$$
(28)
$$S_{{\text{S}}} = - \sin \left( {y_{{{\text{s}}1}} } \right)\sinh \left( {y_{{{\text{s2}}}} } \right)$$
(29)
$$C_{{{\text{SZ}}}} = \cos \left[ {\frac{{y_{{{\text{s1}}}} \left( {H - z} \right)}}{H}} \right]\cosh \left[ {\frac{{y_{{{\text{s2}}}} \left( {H - z} \right)}}{H}} \right]$$
(30)
$$S_{{{\text{SZ}}}} = - \sin \left[ {\frac{{y_{{{\text{s}}1}} \left( {H - z} \right)}}{H}} \right]\sinh \left[ {\frac{{y_{{{\text{s}}2}} \left( {H - z} \right)}}{H}} \right]$$
(31)
$$y_{{{\text{S1}}}} = \frac{2\pi H}{{\lambda_{{\text{s}}} }}\left[ {\frac{{\sqrt {1 + 4\xi^{2} } + 1}}{{2\left( {1 + 4\xi^{2} } \right)}}} \right]^{1/2}$$
(32)
$$y_{{{\text{S2}}}} = - \frac{2\pi H}{{\lambda_{{\text{s}}} }}\left[ {\frac{{\sqrt {1 + 4\xi^{2} } - 1}}{{2\left( {1 + 4\xi^{2} } \right)}}} \right]^{1/2}$$
(33)
$$\frac{H}{{r_{0} }} = e^{{\sum\nolimits_{k = 1}^{n} {\eta_{k} \tan \delta_{k} } }} \sin \theta_{n} - \sin \theta_{0}$$
(34)
$$\theta_{c} = \arctan \frac{{r_{n} \sin \theta_{n} - H}}{{r_{n} \cos \theta_{n} + H\cot \beta }}$$
(35)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhong, JH., Yang, XL. Pseudo-dynamic stability of rock slope considering Hoek–Brown strength criterion. Acta Geotech. 17, 2481–2494 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01425-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01425-0

Keywords

Navigation