Skip to main content
Log in

Mesoscopic pullout behavior of geosynthetics–sand–clay layered reinforced structures using discrete element method

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The geosynthetics–sand–clay layered reinforced (GSCLR) structure has wide application prospects due to its massive adoption of the clay. To date, the coordination between the geosynthetics, sand, and clay is not thorough enough. In light of this, a series of discrete element method models were established for the pullout behavior of a GSCLR structure. The mesoscopic parameters such as the displacement vector, the contact force chain, and the local porosity were analyzed, and the mechanism for the load transfer between the geogrid, sand layer, and clay layer was examined. The thickness and porosity of the sand layer were also considered as the variables. The effects of the various factors on the strength index of the geogrid–sand interface were analyzed. The results showed obvious differences in the movement trend and mesoscopic parameters changes of the sand and clay layer in different regions. The thickness of the shear bands generated in the sand layer was affected by the upper and lower clay layers. At the same pullout displacement, the ultimate pullout resistance of the GSCLR structure did not enlarge continuously with an increase in the thickness of the sand layer, and there was an optimal thickness of the sand layer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AASHTO (2002) Standard specifications for highway bridges, 17th Ed., Washington, DC

  2. Abdi MR, Sadrnejad SA, Arjomand MA (2009) Clay reinforcement using geogrid embedded in thin layers of sand. Int J Civil Eng 7(4):224–235

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abdi MR, Zandieh AR (2014) Experimental and numerical analysis of large scale pull out tests conducted on clays reinforced with geogrids encapsulated with coarse material. Geotext Geomembr 42(5):494–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abufarsakh MY, Coronel J, Tao M (2007) Effect of soil moisture content and dry density on cohesive soil–geosynthetic interactions using large direct shear tests. J Mater Civ Eng 19(7):540–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Balakrishnan S, Viswanadham BVS (2019) Centrifuge model studies on the performance of soil walls reinforced with sand-cushioned geogrid layers. Geotextiles and Geomembranes

  6. Berg R, Christopher BR, Samtani NC (2009) Design of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes. Vol. I and II. Rep. No. FHWA-NHI-10–024, National Highway Institute, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC

  7. Biabani MM, Ngo NT, Indraratna B (2016) Performance evaluation of railway subballast stabilized with geocell based on pullout testing. Geotext Geomembr 44(4):579–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen C, McDowell GR, Thom NH (2012) Discrete element modelling of cyclic loads of geogrid-reinforced ballast under confined and unconfined conditions. Geotext Geomembr 35(35):76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elias V, Christopher BR, Berg R (2001) Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes design and construction guidelines. Rep. No. FHWA-NHI-00–043, National Highway Institute, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC

  10. Gao G, Meguid MA (2018) Effect of particle shape on the response of geogrid-reinforced systems: insights from 3D discrete element analysis. Geotext Geomembr 46(6):685–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gu M, Han J, Zhao M (2020) Three-dimensional DEM analysis of axially loaded geogrid-encased stone column in clay bed. Int J Geomech 20(3):04019180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lai HJ, Zheng JJ, CuiMJ ChuJ (2020) “Soil arching” for piled embankments: insights from stress redistribution behaviour of DEM modelling. Acta Geotech 15(8):2117–2136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lai HJ, Zheng JJ, Zhang RJ, Cui MJ (2018) Classification and characteristics of soil arching structures in pile-supported embankments. Comput Geotech 98:153–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu Y, Deng A, Jaksa M (2018) Three-dimensional modeling of geocell-reinforced straight and curved ballast embankments. Comput Geotech 102:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miao CX, Jia YF, Zhang J, Zhao JB (2020) DEM simulation of the pullout behavior of geogrid-stabilized ballast with the optimization of the coordination between aperture size and particle diameter. Constr Build Mater 255:119359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miao CX, Zheng JJ, Zhang RJ, Cui L (2017) DEM modeling of pullout behavior of geogrid reinforced ballast: the effect of particle shape. Comput Geotech 81:249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mirzaalimohammadi A, Ghazavi M, Roustaei M, Lajevardi SH (2019) Pullout response of strengthened geosynthetic interacting with fine sand. Geotext Geomembr 47(4):530–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. National Concrete Masonry Association (2010) Design manual for segmental retaining walls, Herndon, VA

  19. Ouria A, Karamzadegan S, Emami S (2021) Interface properties of a cement coated geocomposite. Constr Build Mater 266:121014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ouria A, Mahmoudi A (2018) Laboratory and numerical modeling of strip footing on geotextile-reinforced sand with cement-treated interface. Geotext Geomembr 46(1):29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pan YT, Liu Y, Tyagi A, Lee FH, Li DQ (2021) Model-independent strength-reduction factor for effect of spatial variability on tunnel with improved soil surrounds. Géotechnique 71(5):406–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sadat Taghavi SH, Mosallanezhad M (2016) Experimental analysis of large-scale pullout tests conducted on polyester anchored geogrid reinforcement systems. Can Geotech J 54(5):621–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sukmak K, Sukmak P, Horpibulsuk S, Han J, Shen SL, Arulrajah A (2015) Effect of fine content on the pullout resistance mechanism of bearing reinforcement embedded in cohesive-frictional soils. Geotext Geomembr 43(2):107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Toufigh V, Ouria A, Desai CS, Javid N, Toufigh V, Saadatmanesh H (2016) Interface behavior between carbon-fiber polymer and sand. J Test Eval 44(1):385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Unnikrishnan N, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR (2002) Behavior of reinforced clay under monotonic and cyclic loading. Geotext Geomembr 20(2):117–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Z, Jacobs F, Ziegler M (2016) Experimental and DEM investigation of geogrid-soil interaction under pullout loads. Geotext Geomembr 44(3):230–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang KH, Yalew WM, Nguyen M D (2015) Behavior of geotextile-reinforced clay with a coarse material sandwich technique under unconsolidated-undrained triaxial compression. Int J Geomech, 04015083

  28. Zhang B, Shi ML, Bai SW (2006) Investigation on reinforcement-sand-clay layer system using direct-shear test. J Southeast Univ Eng Ed 22(4):544–548

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang R, Zheng J, Bian X (2017) Experimental investigation on effect of curing stress on the strength of cement-stabilized clay at high water content. Acta Geotech 12(4):921–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Z, Zhang X, Qiu H, Daddow M (2016) Dynamic characteristics of track-ballast-silty clay with irregular vibration levels generated by high-speed train based on DEM. Constr Build Mater 125:564–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zheng JJ, Cao WZ, Zhou YJ (2017) Jiang JG (2017) Pull-out test study of interface behavior between triaxial geogrid and soil. Rock Soil Mech 38(2):317–324

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant numbers 52008285, 52178341, and 51809191), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (Grant number 2021A1515011682). The authors would like to acknowledge the financial supports.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoqiang Dong.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, M., Zheng, J., Cao, W. et al. Mesoscopic pullout behavior of geosynthetics–sand–clay layered reinforced structures using discrete element method. Acta Geotech. 17, 2533–2552 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01422-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01422-3

Keywords

Navigation