Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the load response of closed-ended and open-ended pipe piles driven in gravelly sand

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Slow-maintained static load tests were performed on closed-ended and open-ended steel pipe piles driven side by side in a gravelly sand soil profile. The site investigation consisted of multiple cone penetration tests (CPTs) and standard penetration tests (SPTs), as well as laboratory tests on soil samples collected at various depths from the test site to determine basic soil properties. The test piles were densely instrumented with a combination of electrical-resistance and vibrating-wire strain gauges. The open-ended test pile was a specially fabricated double-wall, fully-instrumented pile, allowing for separation of the measurements of the inner and outer shaft resistances. Detailed comparison of the load test results, in terms of driving resistance, load response and profiles of unit shaft and base resistances for the two test piles, is presented and discussed. The applicability of three CPT-based pile design methods is assessed through a layer-by-layer comparison of the estimated resistances with those measured in the static load tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

(modified after [25])

Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASTM D1143/D1143 M-07 (2013) Standard test methods for deep foundations under static axial compressive load. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abu-Farsakh MY, Haque MN, Tsai C (2017) A full-scale field study for performance evaluation of axially loaded large-diameter cylinder piles with pipe piles and PSC piles. Acta Geotech 12:753–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0498-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alawneh AS, Malkawi AIH, Al-Deeky H (1999) Tension tests on smooth and rough model piles in dry sand. Can Geotech J 36:746–753. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-36-4-746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aoki N, Velloso DA (1975) An approximate method to estimate the bearing capacity of piles. In: Proceedings of the 5th Pan-American conference of soil mechanics and foundation engineering. International society of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, pp 367–376

  5. Axelsson G (2000) Long-term set-up of driven piles in sand. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  6. Basu D, Salgado R (2014) Closure to “load and resistance factor design of drilled shafts in sand” by D. Basu and Rodrigo Salgado. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140:07014002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Basu P, Loukidis D, Prezzi M, Salgado R (2014) The mechanics of friction fatigue in jacked piles installed in sand. In: From soil behavior fundamentals to innovations in geotechnical engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp 546–557

  8. Bałachowski L (2007) Size effect in centrifuge cone penetration tests. Arch Hydroeng Environ Mech 54:161–181

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bica AVD, Prezzi M, Seo H et al (2014) Instrumentation and axial load testing of displacement piles. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 167:238–252. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.12.00080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bolton MD, Gui MW, Garnier J et al (1999) Centrifuge cone penetration tests in sand. Géotechnique 49:543–552. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1999.49.4.543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bowman ET, Soga K (2005) Mechanisms of setup of displacement piles in sand: laboratory creep tests. Can Geotech J 42:1391–1407. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Briaud J, Tucker L (1984) Piles in sand: a method including residual stresses. J Geotech Eng 110:1666–1680. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:11(1666)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bullock PJ, Schmertmann JH, McVay MC, Townsend FC (2005) Side shear setup. I: results from Florida test piles. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:301–310. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:3(301)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi Y, O’Neill MW (1997) Soil plugging and relaxation in pipe pile during earthquake motion. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123:975–982. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:10(975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chow FC, Jardine RJJ, Brucy F, Nauroy JF (1998) Effects of time on capacity of pipe piles in dense marine sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124:254–264. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:11(1028.x)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Clausen CJF, Aas PM, Karlsrud K (2005) Bearing capacity of driven piles in sand, the NGI approach. In: Proceedings of international symposium on Frontiers in offshore geotechnics. Perth, pp 677–681

  17. Fellenius BH (2002) Determining the resistance distribution in piles: Part I. Notes on shift of no-load reading and residual load. Geotech News Mag 20:35–38

    Google Scholar 

  18. Finlay TCR, White DJ, Bolton MD, Nagayama T (2001) Press-in piling: the installation of instrumented steel tubular piles with and without driving shoes. In: 5th International conference on deep foundations practice. Singapore, pp 199–208

  19. Fleming K, Weltman A, Randolph M, Elson K (2008) Piling engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ganju E, Han F, Prezzi M, Salgado R (2019) Static load test on closed-ended pipe pile driven in gravelly sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng

  21. Gavin K, Lehane B (2003) The shaft capacity of pipe piles in sand. Can Geotech J 45:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1139/T02-093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gavin K, Lehane B (2007) Base load–displacement response of piles in sand. Can Geotech J 44:1053–1063. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grabe J, Heins E (2017) Coupled deformation–seepage analysis of dynamic capacity tests on open-ended piles in saturated sand. Acta Geotech 12:211–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0442-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hajduk EL, Paikowsky SG (2000) Performance evaluation of an instrumented test pile cluster. In: Performance confirmation of constructed geotechnical facilities. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp 124–147

  25. Han F, Ganju E, Prezzi M et al (2019) Axial resistance of open-ended pipe pile driven in gravelly sand. Géotechnique. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.p.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Han F, Ganju E, Salgado R, Prezzi M (2018) Effects of interface roughness, particle geometry, and gradation on the sand–steel interface friction angle. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 144(12):04018096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Han F, Lim J, Salgado R, Prezzi M, Zaheer M (2015) Load and resistance factor design of bridge foundations accounting for pile group–soil interaction (Joint Transportation Research Program Publication No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2015/24). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316009

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Han F, Prezzi M, Salgado R, Zaheer M (2017) Axial resistance of closed-ended steel-pipe piles driven in multilayered soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143:04016102. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Han F, Salgado R, Prezzi M, Lim J (2017) Shaft and base resistance of non-displacement piles in sand. Comput Geotech 83:184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Han F, Prezzi M, Salgado R (2018) Static and dynamic pile load tests on closed-ended driven pipe pile in Indiana, U.S. In: International foundations congress and equipment exposition (IFCEE 2018). Orlando, Florida

  31. Han F, Bisht V, Prezzi M, Salgado R (2019) Validation of pile design methods for closed-ended driven pipe piles. In: Geo-congress 2019. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp 98–110

  32. Han F, Ganju E, Salgado R, Prezzi M (2019) “Closure to ‘Effects of interface roughness, particle geometry, and gradation on the sand–steel interface friction angle’ by Fei Han, Eshan Ganju, Rodrigo Salgado, and Monica Prezzi.” J Geotech Geoenviron Eng (accepted)

  33. Henke S, Grabe J (2013) Field measurements regarding the influence of the installation method on soil plugging in tubular piles. Acta Geotech 8:335–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-012-0191-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Igoe DJP, Gavin KG, O’Kelly BC (2011) Shaft capacity of open-ended piles in sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137:903–913. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Iskander M (2011) On the design of instrumented double-wall model piles used to investigate plugging of open-ended pipe piles. Geotech Test J. https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj103096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jardine R, Chow F, Overy R et al (2005) ICP design methods for driven piles in sands and clays. Thomas Telford, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Jardine RJ, Standing JR, Chow FC (2006) Some observations of the effects of time on the capacity of piles driven in sand. Géotechnique 56:227–244. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2006.56.4.227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim D, Bica AV, Salgado R et al (2009) Load testing of a closed-ended pipe pile driven in multilayered soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135:463–473. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:4(463)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kolk HJ, Baaijens AE, Senders M (2005) Design criteria for pipe piles in silica sands. In: Proceedings of international symposium on Frontiers in offshore geotechnics. Perth, pp 711–716

  40. Lee W, Kim D, Salgado R, Zaheer M (2010) Setup of driven piles in layered soil. Soils Found 50:585–598. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.50.585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee J, Salgado R, Paik K (2003) Estimation of load capacity of pipe piles in sand based on cone penetration test results. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129:391–403. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:6(391)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lehane BM, Gavin KG (2001) Base resistance of jacked pipe piles in sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:473–480. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:6(473)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lehane BM, Jardine RJ, Bond AJ, Frank R (1993) Mechanisms of shaft friction in sand from instrumented pile tests. J Geotech Eng 119:19–35. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:1(19)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lehane BM, Randolph MF (2002) Evaluation of a minimum base resistance for driven pipe piles in siliceous sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128:198–205. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:3(198)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lehane BM, Schneider JA, Xu X (2005) The UWA-05 method for prediction of axial capacity of driven piles in sand. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on Frontiers in offshore geotechnics (IS-FOG 2005). Perth, pp 683–689

  46. Niazi FS, Mayne PW (2013) Cone penetration test based direct methods for evaluating static axial capacity of single piles. Geotech Geol Eng 31:979–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-013-9662-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Paik K, Lee S (1993) Behavior of soil plugs in open-ended model piles driven into sands. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 11:353–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641199309379929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Paik K, Salgado R (2003) Determination of bearing capacity of open-ended piles in sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129:46–57. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:1(46)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Paik K, Salgado R, Lee J, Kim B (2003) Behavior of open- and closed-ended piles driven into sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129:296–306. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:4(296)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Poulos HG (1987) Analysis of residual stress effects in piles. J Geotech Eng 113:216–229. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:3(216)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Randolph MF (2003) Science and empiricism in pile foundation design. Géotechnique 53:847–875. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.10.847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Salgado R (2008) The engineering of foundations. McGraw-Hills, New York

    Google Scholar 

  53. Salgado R, Han F, Prezzi M (2017) Axial resistance of non-displacement piles and pile groups in sand. Riv Ital Geotec 51:35–46. https://doi.org/10.19199/2017.4.0557-1405.35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Salgado R, Prezzi M (2007) Computation of cavity expansion pressure and penetration resistance in sands. Int J Geomech 7(4):251–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Song H, Saraswathy V (2007) Corrosion monitoring of reinforced concrete structures—a review. Int J Electrochem Sci 2:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wadell H (1932) Volume, shape, and roundness of rock particles. J Geol 40:443–451. https://doi.org/10.1086/623964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wadell H (1933) Sphericity and roundness of rock particles. J Geol 41:310–331. https://doi.org/10.1086/624040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. White DJ, Lehane BM (2004) Friction fatigue on displacement piles in sand. Géotechnique 54:645–658. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2004.54.10.645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. White DJ, Zhao Y (2006) A model-scale investigation into ‘set-up’ of displacement piles in sand. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on physical modelling in geotechnics ICPMG, vol 6, pp 889–894

    Google Scholar 

  60. Xu X, Schneider JA, Lehane BM (2008) Cone penetration test (CPT) methods for end-bearing assessment of open- and closed-ended driven piles in siliceous sand. Can Geotech J 45:1130–1141. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang Z, Wang YH (2015) Examining setup mechanisms of driven piles in sand using laboratory model pile tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141:04014114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001252

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented in this paper was funded by the Joint Transportation Research Program (JTRP) administered by the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) and Purdue University through Contract SPR-4040. The support of the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is gratefully acknowledged. The continuous support received from INDOT staff Mir Zaheer is gratefully appreciated. The authors are grateful for the help from Kevin Brower, Yohan Casiraghi, Maria Elisa Muller De Faria, Matheus Santanna Andrade, Brunno Godinho Vieira, Shahedur Rahman, Abhishek S.V., Vibhav Bisht for pile instrumentation and load tests. The authors also acknowledge the support from Jonathan Paauwe from INDOT for site investigation, and Jeff Carlson and Patric Tuuk from Superior Construction Company, Inc. for the field operations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Han.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, F., Ganju, E., Salgado, R. et al. Comparison of the load response of closed-ended and open-ended pipe piles driven in gravelly sand. Acta Geotech. 14, 1785–1803 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00863-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00863-1

Keywords

Navigation