Skip to main content
Log in

Variation behavior of pore-water pressure in warm frozen soil under load and its relation to deformation

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Containing a considerable amount of unfrozen water, frozen soil may produce excess pore-water pressure under external load, especially at temperatures near the thawing point. The variation of the pressure has a capability in influencing the deformation of frozen soils. In order to investigate the variation behavior of pore-water pressure in frozen soils and its relation to deformation, a series of pore-water pressure tests were conducted at subzero temperatures. A total of 13 frozen specimens were tested at various temperatures, and the pore-water pressures as well as the displacement were recorded. Then, variation behaviors of pore-water pressures and their effect on deformation were discussed. Results indicated that when a frozen soil sample is subjected to load, it responds with a slow increase in pore-water pressure in the early test stage up to a peak value, followed by subsequent extremely slow dissipation. The characteristic of pore-water pressure variations recorded in this study are closely correlated with temperature, soil type, and moisture content. Generally, the variation in pore-water pressure in frozen soils is caused by the coupled action of two opposing processes: an increasing process induced by solid matrix compression and a decreasing process induced by unfrozen water drainage. Thus, consolidation can be shown to occur as a component of compression and plays a significant role in the total deformation of warm frozen soils, although this effect decreases as decreasing soil temperature. However, it is difficult to distinguish the consolidation deformation from the creep deformation when taking into account the continuous variation in pore-water pressure throughout the test period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akagawa S, Hiasa S, Kanie S, and Huang SL (2008) Pore water and effective pressure in the frozen fringe during soil freezing. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on permafrost, Fairbanks, Alaska, 29 June–3 July 2008. University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, pp 13–18

  2. Andersland OB, Ladanyi B (2004) Frozen ground engineering. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arenson LU, Springman SM (2005) Mathematical descriptions for the behaviour of ice-rich frozen soils at temperatures close to 0 °C. Can Geotech J 42:431–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arenson LU, Springman SM (2005) Triaxial constant stress and constant strain rate tests on ice-rich permafrost samples. Can Geotech J 42:412–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arenson LU, Springman SM, Sego DC (2007) The rheology of frozen soils. Appl Rheol 17(1):12147-12114–12147-12141

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brodskaya AG (1965) Compressibility of frozen ground. DTIC document

  7. Burt TP, Williams PJ (1976) Hydraulic conductivity in frozen soils. Earth Surf Process 1:349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Das BM (2008) Advanced soil mechanics. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eigenbrod KD, Knutsson S, Sheng DC (1996) Porewater pressures in freezing and thawing fine-grained soils. J Cold Reg Eng 10(2):77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fukuda M (1983) The pore water pressure profile in porous rocks during freezing. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on permafrost, Fairbanks, Alaska, 17–22 July 1983. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp 322–327

  11. Harris C, Davies MCR (1998) Pressures recorded during laboratory freezing and thawing of a natural silt-rich soil. In: Proceedings of the 7th international permafrost conference, Yellowknife, Canada, 23–27 June 1998, pp 433–439

  12. Hazirbaba K, Zhang Y, Hulsey JL (2011) Evaluation of temperature and freeze–thaw effects on excess pore pressure generation of fine-grained soils. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:372–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hivon E, Sego D (1995) Strength of frozen saline soils. Can Geotech J 32(2):336–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kia M (2012) Measuring porewater pressures in partially frozen soils. Doctoral thesis, University of Alberta

  15. Ma XJ, Zhang JM, Chang XX, Zheng B, Zhang MY (2007) Experimental study on creep of warm and ice-rich frozen soil. Chin J Geotech Eng 29(6):848–852 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller RD (1973) Soil freezing in relation to pore water pressure and temperature. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on permafrost, Yakutsk, Siberia, 13–28 July 1973. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, pp 344–352

  17. Nixon JF (1991) Discrete ice lens theory for frost heave in soils. Can Geotech J 28:843–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qi JL, Sheng Y, Zhang JM, Wen Z (2007) Settlement of embankments in permafrost regions in the Qinghai–Tibet plateau. Norsk Geogr Tidsskr Nor J Geogr 61(2):49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qin YH, Zhang JM, Zheng B, Ma XJ (2009) Experimental study for the compressible behavior of warm and ice-rich frozen soil under the embankment of Qinghai–Tibet railroad. Cold Reg Sci Technol 57(2):148–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sayles F (1988) State of the art: mechanical properties of frozen soil. In: Fifth international symposium of ground freezing, Nottingham, pp 143–159

  21. Seto J, Konrad JM (1994) Pore pressure measurements during freezing of an overconsolidated clayey silt. Cold Reg Sci Technol 22(4):319–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Su K, Zhang JM, Liu SL, Zhang H, Ruan GF (2013) Compressibility of warm and ice-rich frozen soil. J Glaciol Geocryol 35(2):369–375 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vyalov S (1959) Rheological properties and bearing capacity of frozen soils. Academy of Science, Moscow (Translation, U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, SIPRE TL 74)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vyalov SS (2005) Rheology of frozen soils. China Railway Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang J (2017) Laboratory study on mechanical properties of frozen clay through state concept. Doctoral thesis, Hokkaido University

  26. Wang JC, Xu XZ, Zhang LX, Deng YS (1995) Experiment study of influence of soil type on ice formation and cryogenic structure of freezing soils. J Glaciol Geocryol 17(1):16–22 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang SH, Qi JL, Yin ZY, Zhang JM, Ma W (2014) A simple rheological element based creep model for frozen soils. Cold Reg Sci Technol 106–107:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Watanabe K, Osada Y (2016) Comparison of hydraulic conductivity in frozen saturated and unfrozen unsaturated soils. Vadose Zone J 15(5):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Watanabe K, Wake T (2008) Hydraulic conductivity in frozen unsaturated soil. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on permafrost, Fairbanks, Alaska, 29 June–3 July 2008. University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, pp 1927–1932

  30. Williams PJ (1966) Pore pressures at a penetrating frost line and their prediction. Geotech 16(3):187–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Williams PJ, Burt TP (1974) Measurement of hydraulic conductivity of frozen soils. Can Geotech J 11:647–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu GF, Wu W, Qi JL (2016) Modeling the viscous behavior of frozen soil with hypoplasticity. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 40(15):2061–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu GF, Wu W, Qi JL (2016) An extended hypoplastic constitutive model for frozen sand. Soils Found 56(4):704–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu GF, Peng C, Wu W, Qi JL (2017) Combined constitutive model for creep and steady flow rate of frozen soil in an unconfined condition. Can Geotech J 54(7):907–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yao XL, Qi JL, Wu W (2012) Three dimensional analysis of large strain thaw consolidation in permafrost. Acta Geotech 7(3):193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang LH, Ma W, Yang CS, Yuan C (2014) Investigation of the porewater pressures of coarse-grained sandy soil during open-system step-freezing and thawing tests. Eng Geol 181:233–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang H, Zhang JM, Zhang ZL, Chai MT (2016) Measurement of hydraulic conductivity of Qinghai–Tibet plateau silty clay under subfreezing temperatures. Chin J Geotech Eng 38(6):1030–1035 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang H, Zhang JM, Zhang ZL, Chai MT (2016) Investigation of the porewater pressure of saturated warm frozen soils under a constant load. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 138(6):062001-1–062001-6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41401087, 41471062, and 41471063), the State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering (No. SKLFSE-ZT-35). We thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hu Zhang or Ze Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z. et al. Variation behavior of pore-water pressure in warm frozen soil under load and its relation to deformation. Acta Geotech. 15, 603–614 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0736-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0736-4

Keywords

Navigation