Abstract
Granular materials can behave as harmless sand dunes or as devastating landslides. A granular avalanche marks the transition between these distinct solid-like and fluid-like states. The solid-like state is typically described using plasticity models from critical state theory. In the fluid regime, granular flow is commonly captured using a visco-plastic model. However, due to our limited understanding of the mechanism governing the solid–fluid-like transition, characterizing the material behavior throughout the life cycle of an avalanche remains an open challenge. Here, we employ laboratory experiments of transient avalanches spontaneously generated by a rotating drum. We report measurements of dilatancy and grain kinematics before, during, and after each avalanche. Those measurements are directly incorporated into a rate-dependent plasticity model that quantitatively predicts the granular flow measured in experiments. Furthermore, we find that dilatancy in the solid-like state controls the triggering of granular avalanches and therefore plays a key role in the solid–fluid-like transition. With the proposed approach, we demonstrate that the life cycle of a laboratory avalanche, from triggering to run out, can be fully explained. Our results represent an important step toward a unified understanding of the physical phenomena associated with transitional behavior in granular media.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.




References
- 1.
Andrade JE, Chen Q, Le PH, Avila CF, Evans TM (2012) On the rheology of dilative granular media: bridging solid and fluid-like behavior. J Mech Phys Solids 60:1122–1136
- 2.
Courrech du Pont S, Fischer R, Gondret P, Perrin B, Rabaud M (2005) Instantaneous velocity profiles during granular avalanches. Phys Rev Lett 94:048003
- 3.
Daerr A, Douady S (1999) Two types of avalanche behaviour in granular media. Nature 399:241–243
- 4.
Evesque P (1991) Analysis of the statistics of sandpile avalanches using soil-mechanics results and concepts. Phys Rev A 43:2720–2740
- 5.
Fischer R, Gondret P, Perrin B, Rabaud M (2008) Dynamics of dry granular avalanches. Phys Rev E 78:021302
- 6.
Forterre Y, Pouliquen O (2008) Flows of dense granular media. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 40:1–24
- 7.
George DL, Iverson RM (2014) A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy II Numerical predictions and experimental tests. Proc R Soc A 470:20130820
- 8.
Gray JMNT (2001) Granular flow in partially filled slowly rotating drums. J Fluid Mech 441:1–29
- 9.
Iverson RM, George DL (2014) A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I physical basis. Proc R Soc A 470:20130819
- 10.
Jaeger HM, Nagel SR (1992) Physics of granular state. Science 255:1523–1531
- 11.
Jaeger HM, Nagel SR, Behringer RP (1996) Granular solids, liquid and gases. Rev Mod Phys 68:1259
- 12.
Jop P, Forterre Y, Pouliquen O (2005) Crucial role of side walls for granular surface flows: consequences for the rheology. J Fluid Mech 541:167–192
- 13.
Jop P, Forterre Y, Pouliquen O (2006) A constitutive law for dense granular flows. Nature 441:727–730
- 14.
Kabla AJ, Senden TJ (2009) Dilatancy in slow granular flow. Phys Rev Lett 102:28301
- 15.
Lowe DR (1976) Grain flow and grain flow deposits. J Sediment Petrol 46:188–199
- 16.
Midi GDR (2004) On dense granular flow. Eur Phys J E 14:341–365
- 17.
Orpe A, Khakhar DV (2001) Scaling relations for granular flow in quasi-two-dimensional rotating cylinders. Phys Rev E 64:031302
- 18.
Pailha M, Pouliquen O (2009) A two-phase flow description of the initiation of underwater granular avalanches. J Fluid Mech 633:115–136
- 19.
Pailha M, Nicolas M, Pouliquen O (2008) Initiation of underwater granular avalanches: influence of the initial volume fraction. Phys Fluids 20:11701
- 20.
Pan B, Qian K, Xie H, Asundi A (2009) Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review. Meas Sci Technol 20:062001
- 21.
Peng C, Guo X, Wu W, Wang Y (2016) Unified modelling of granular media with smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Acta Geotech 11:1231
- 22.
Pouliquen O, Renaut N (1996) Onset of granular flows on an inclined rough surface: dilatancy effects. J Phys II Fr 6:923–935
- 23.
Prime N, Dufour F, Darve F (2014) Solid-fluid transition modelling in geomaterials and application to a mudflow interacting with an obstacle. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 38:1341–1361
- 24.
Rajchenbach J (1990) Flow in powders: from discrete avalanches to continuous regime. Phys Rev Lett 65:2221–2224
- 25.
Reinsch CH (1967) Smoothing by spline functions. Numer Math 10:177–183
- 26.
Reynolds O (1885) On the dilatancy of media composed of rigid particle in contact. Philos Mag Ser 5(20):469–481
- 27.
Rowe PW (1962) The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact. Proc R Soc Lond A 269:500–527
- 28.
Schofield AN, Wroth P (1968) Critical state soil mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York City
- 29.
Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier H (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements: basic concepts theory and applications. Springer, Berlin
- 30.
Wood DM (1991) Soil behaviour and critical state soil mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Ryan Hurley for his fruitful comments. This work has been partially funded by Keck Institute for Space Studies (KISS) and the California Institute of Technology; this support is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Appendices
Appendices
Appendix 1: Determination of the governing equation of the flow
In this appendix, we show how the governing equation of the granular flow (5) is derived from the linear momentum balance equation:
Let us consider a granular flow along an inclined infinite slope. The position in the flow direction and in the flow depth direction is labeled x and y, respectively. The free surface of the flow makes an angle θ with the horizontal.
The local statement of linear momentum balance expressed in full gives:
Exploiting the infinite character of the problem, we assume that the stress components do not vary in the x-direction, such that: \(\frac{{\partial \sigma_{xx} }}{\partial x} = \frac{{\partial \sigma_{yx} }}{\partial x} = 0\). Hence, by writing \(\sigma_{yy} = \sigma\) and \(\sigma_{xy} = \tau ,\) we obtain:
The definition of dilatancy β is given by:
We know that in the fluid-like state the granular material reaches critical state so that β = 0. Therefore, we must have v y = 0 and a y = 0. Equation (7b) can be rewritten as:
Recalling Coulomb friction law and using the previous expression, we have:
Combining Eq. (7a) with Eq. (10) further gives:
By denoting the surface acceleration in the flow direction a x by a, we finally obtain the governing equation of the granular flow from (11):
Appendix 2: Determination of the difference between the angle of avalanche θ A and angle of repose θ R
Knowing that in the solid-like state the surface acceleration a = 0 and the mobilized friction \(\mu = \beta + \mu_{1}\), Eq. (1) can be expressed as:
Multiplying each side of Eq. (13) by cos θ R, we have:
Using the formula sin (x − y) = sin x cos y − cos x sin y, we obtain:
Moreover, we defined the parameter μ l to be \(\mu_{\text{l}} = \tan \theta_{R} ,\) such that:
Once the inclination angle is equal to the angle of avalanche θ A, the dilatancy reaches its peak value β*. Therefore, the previous equation can be rewritten as:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marteau, E., Andrade, J.E. A model for decoding the life cycle of granular avalanches in a rotating drum. Acta Geotech. 13, 549–555 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-017-0609-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
Keywords
- Avalanches
- Dilatancy
- Granular materials
- Plasticity
- Rate dependent
- Solid/fluid transition