Abstract
The mechanics of water retention in unsaturated granular media is of critical importance to a broad range of disciplines including soil science, geotechnical engineering, hydrology and agriculture. Fundamental to water retention is the relationship between degree of saturation and suction, referred to as the water retention curve (WRC). The majority of WRC models are empirically based and seldom incorporate physically meaningful parameters. This study presents an analytical model for the WRC that considers separate contributions from fully filled pores and partially filled pores containing liquid bridges. A recently established unique k-gamma pore volume distribution function for randomly assembled monodisperse granular materials is adopted to determine the contributions of fully filled pores. Calculation of the contribution of residual pore water retained in partially filled pores is undertaken by representing pores as individual cells shaped as platonic shapes of various sizes and determining the volume of all liquid bridges suspended between particles within the pore cells. Weighting factors for the various cell types are obtained from the pore volume distribution to determine the relative contribution of different pore cell geometries to the total residual pore water. The combined model accurately describes experimental data for monodisperse spherical glass beads for both wetting and drying, even though the underlying assumptions do not reflect exactly the complex, interconnected and highly irregular geometry of the pore space. A single parameter provides the lateral shift between the wetting and drying curves. The results of this study provide a geometric understanding of the mechanisms of water retention in granular media.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aste T, Di Matteo T (2008) Emergence of Gamma distributions in granular materials and packing models. Phys Rev E 77(2):021309
Aste T, Di Matteo T, Saadatfar M, Senden TJ, Schröter M, Swinney HL (2007) An invariant distribution in static granular media. Europhys Lett 79(2):24003
Beckett CTS, Augarde CE (2013) Prediction of soil water retention properties using pore-size distribution and porosity. Can Geotech J 50(4):435–450
Bird NRA, Perrier E, Rieu M (2000) The water retention function for a model of soil structure with pore and solid fractal distributions. Eur J Soil Sci 51(1):55–63
Birle E, Heyer D, Vogt N (2008) Influence of the initial water content and dry density on the soil-water retention curve and the shrinkage behaviour of a compacted clay. Acta Geotech 3:191–200
Blonquist JM, Jones SB, Lebron I, Robinson D (2006) Microstructural and phase configurational effects determining water content: dielectric relationships of aggregated porous media. Water Resour Res 42(5):1–13
Brooks RH, Corey AT (1964) Hydraulic properties of porous media. Hydrology Paper No. 3, Civil Engineering Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
Casini F, Vaunat J, Romero E, Desideri A (2012) Consequences on water retention properties of double-porosity features in a compacted silt. Acta Geotech 7:139–150
Della Vecchia G, Dieudonné A-C, Jommi C, Charlier R (2015) Accounting for evolving pore size distribution in water retention models for compacted clays. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 39:702–723
Dury O, Fischer U, Schulin R (1998) Dependence of hydraulic and pneumatic characteristics of soils on a dissolved organic compound. J Contam Hydrol 33(1–2):39–57
Finney JL (1970) Random packings and the structure of simple liquids. I. The geometry of random close packing. Proc R Soc Lond 319:479–493
Fredlund DG, Sheng D, Zhao J (2011) Estimation of soil suction from the soil-water characteristic curve. Can Geotech J 48:186–198
Fredlund DG, Xing A (1994) Equations for the soil-water characteristic curve. Can J Geotechn Eng 31:521–532
Gimenez D, Perfect E, Rawls WJ, Packepsky Y (1997) Fractal models for predicting soil hydraulic properties: a review. J Eng Geol 48(3–4):161–183
Haines WB (1930) Studies in the physical properties of soil. V. The hysteresis effect in capillary properties and the modes of moisture distribution associated therewith. J Agric Sci 20(1):97–116
Hu R, Chen YF, Liu HH, Zhon CB (2013) A water retention curve and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity model for deformable soils: consideration of the change in pore-size distribution. Géotechnique 63(16):1389–1405
Kasangaki GJ, Medero GM, Ooi JY (2012) Factors influencing water retention characteristics of granular materials. In: Laloui L, Ferrari A (eds) Multiphysical testing of soils and shales. Springer, Berlin, pp 111–116
Khalili N, Habte MA, Zargarbashi S (2008) A fully coupled flow deformation model for cyclic analysis of unsaturated soils including hydraulic and mechanical hysteresis. Comput Geotech 35(6):872–889
Klein T et al (2014) Quantifying transpirable soil water and its relations to tree water use dynamics in a water-limited pine forest. Ecohydrology 7(2):409–419
Laloui L, Salager S, Rizzi M (2013) Retention behaviour of natural clayey materials at different temperatures. Acta Geotech 2013:537–546
Likos WJ (2009) Pore-Scale model for water retention in unsaturated sand. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol 1145, pp 907–910
Likos WJ, Jaafar R (2013) Pore-scale model for water retention and fluid partitioning of partially saturated granular soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139:724–737
Mah K-C, Tan Y-C, Chem C-H (2011) The influence of water retention curve hysteresis on the stability of unsaturated soil slopes. Hydrol Process 25:3563–3574
Megias-Alguacil D, Gauckler JL (2009) Capillary forces between two solid spheres linked by a concave liquid bridge: regions of existence and forces mapping. Wiley InterScience, Zurich
Millington RJ, Quirk JP (1959) Permeability of porous media. Nature 183:387–388
Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12(3):513–522
Nimmo JR (2004) Porosity and pore size distribution. In: Hillel D (ed) Encyclopedia of soils in the environment. Elsevier, London, pp 295–393
Nimmo JR, Miller EE (1986) The temperature dependence of isothermal moisture vs potential characteristics of soil. Soil Sci Soc Am 50:1105–1113
Or D, Tuller M (1999) Liquid retention and interfacial area in variably saturated porous media: upscaling from single-pore to sample-scale model. Water Resour Res 32(12):3591–3605
Russell AR (2010) Water retention characteristics of double porosity soils. Eur J Soil Sci 61(3):412–424
Russell AR, Buzzi O (2012) A fractal basis for soil water characteristic curves with hydraulic hysteresis. Géotechnique 62(3):269–274
Russell AR (2014) How water retention in fractal soils depends on particle and pore sizes, shapes, volumes and surface areas. Geotechnique 64(5):379–390
Sufian A, Russell A, Whittle A, Saadatfar M (2015) Pore shapes, volume distribution and orientations in monodisperse granular assemblies. Granul Matter 17(6):1–16
To HD, Scheuermann A, Williams DJ (2012) A new simple model for the determination of the pore constriction size distribution. In: International conference on scour and erosion, Paris
van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(5):892–898
Vincens E, Witt KJ, Homberg U (2015) Approaches to determine the constriction size distribution for understanding filtration phenomena in granular materials. Acta Geotech 10(3):291–303
Wang X, Li J (2015) A novel liquid bridge model for estimating SWCC and permeability of granular material. Powder Technol 275:121–130
Yang H, Khoshgalb A, Russell AR (2014) Fractal-based estimation of hydraulic conductivity from soil-water characteristic curves considering hysteresis. Goetech Lett 4:1–10
Acknowledgements
Thanks go to the Australian Research Council for funding through Grant DP150104123.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferraro, A., Sufian, A. & Russell, A.R. Analytical derivation of water retention for random monodisperse granular media. Acta Geotech. 12, 1319–1328 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-017-0546-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-017-0546-0