A paper recently published by Bartelt and Buser (hereafter identified as “the authors”) aims to clarify relationships between granular dilatancy and dispersive pressure and to question the effective stress principle and its application to shallow granular avalanches (Bartelt and Buser in Act Geotech 11:549–557, 2). The paper also criticizes our own recent work, which utilizes the concepts of evolving dilatancy and effective stress to model the initiation and dynamics of water-saturated landslides and debris flows. Here we first explain why we largely agree with the authors’ views of dilatancy and dispersive pressure as they apply to depth-integrated granular avalanche models, and why we disagree with their views of effective stress and pore-fluid pressure. We conclude by explaining why the authors’ characterization of our recently developed D-Claw model is inaccurate.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bagnold RA (1954) Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a Newtonian fluid under shear. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 225:49–63
Bartelt P, Buser O (2016) The relation between dilatancy, effective stress and dispersive pressure in granular avalanches. Acta Geotech 11:549–557. doi:10.1007/s11440-016-0463-7
Boyer F, Guazzelli E, Pouliquen O (2011) Unifying suspension and granular rheology. Phys Rev Lett 107:188301
Chen C-L (1988) Generalized viscoplastic modeling of debris flow. J Hydraul Eng 114:237–258
de Boer R, Ehlers W (1990) The development of the concept of effective stresses. Acta Mech 83:77–92
Forterre Y, Pouliquen O (2008) Flows of dense granular media. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 40:1–24
George DL, Iverson RM (2014) A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. II. numerical predictions and experimental tests. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A. doi:10.1098/rspa.2013.0820
Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Rev Geophys 35:245–296
Iverson RM, Logan M, LaHusen RG, Berti M (2010) The perfect debris flow? Aggregated results from 28 large-scale experiments. J Geophys Res Earth Surf. doi:10.1029/2009JF001514
Iverson RM, George DL (2014) A depth-averaged debris-flow model that includes the effects of evolving dilatancy. I. Physical basis. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 470:20130819. doi:10.1098/rspa.2013.0819
Iverson RM, George DL (2016) Modeling landslide liquefaction, mobility bifurcation and the dynamics of the 2014 Oso disaster. Geotechnique 66:175–187. doi:10.1680/jgeot.15.LM.004
Iverson RM, Reid ME (1992) Gravity-driven groundwater flow and slope failure potential: 1. Elastic effective-stress model. Water Resour Res 28:925–938
Lade PV, de Boer R (1997) The concept of effective stress for soil, concrete and rock. Geotechnique 47:61–78
O’Brien J, Julien P, Fullerton W (1993) Two-dimensional water flood and mudflow simulation. J Hydraul Eng 119:244–261. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:2(244)
Passman SL, McTigue DF (1986) A new approach to the effective stress principle. In: Saxena SK (ed) Compressibility phenomena in subsidence. Engineering Foundation, New York, pp 79–91
Takahashi T (1978) Mechanical characteristics of debris flow. J Hydraul Div Am Soc Civ Eng 104:1153–1169
Takahashi T (1981) Debris flow. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 13:57–77
Terzaghi K (1925) Erdbaumechanik auf bodenphysikalischer Grundlage. F Deuticke, Leipzig
Wood DM (1990) Soil behavior and critical state soil mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
About this article
Cite this article
Iverson, R.M., George, D.L. Discussion of “The relation between dilatancy, effective stress and dispersive pressure in granular avalanches” by P. Bartelt and O. Buser (DOI: 10.1007/s11440-016-0463-7). Acta Geotech. 11, 1465–1468 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0502-4
- Debris flow
- Dispersive pressure
- Effective stress