Advertisement

Acta Geotechnica

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 739–761 | Cite as

An experimental database for the development, calibration and verification of constitutive models for sand with focus to cyclic loading: part I—tests with monotonic loading and stress cycles

  • Torsten WichtmannEmail author
  • Theodoros Triantafyllidis
Research Paper

Abstract

For numerical studies of geotechnical structures under earthquake loading, aiming to examine a possible failure due to liquefaction, using a sophisticated constitutive model for the soil is indispensable. Such a model must adequately describe the material response to a cyclic loading under constant volume (undrained) conditions, amongst others the relaxation of effective stress (pore pressure accumulation) or the effective stress loops repeatedly passed through after a sufficiently large number of cycles (cyclic mobility, stress attractors). The soil behaviour under undrained cyclic loading is manifold, depending on the initial conditions (e.g. density, fabric, effective mean pressure, stress ratio) and the load characteristics (e.g. amplitude of the cycles, application of stress or strain cycles). In order to develop, calibrate and verify a constitutive model with focus to undrained cyclic loading, the data from high-quality laboratory tests comprising a variety of initial conditions and load characteristics are necessary. The purpose of these two companion papers was to provide such database collected for a fine sand. The database consists of numerous undrained cyclic triaxial tests with stress or strain cycles applied to samples consolidated isotropically or anisotropically. Monotonic triaxial tests with drained or undrained conditions have also been performed. Furthermore, drained triaxial, oedometric or isotropic compression tests with several un- and reloading cycles are presented. Part I concentrates on the triaxial tests with monotonic loading or stress cycles. All test data presented herein will be available from the homepage of the first author. As an example of the examination of an existing constitutive model, the experimental data are compared to element test simulations using hypoplasticity with intergranular strain.

Keywords

Cyclic triaxial tests Database Fine sand Monotonic triaxial tests Stress cycles 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Parts of the presented study have been performed within the framework of the project “Geotechnical robustness and self-healing of foundations of offshore wind power plants” funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Savety (BMU, project No. 0327618). Other parts were conducted within the framework of the project “Improvement of an accumulation model for high-cyclic loading” funded by German Research Council (DFG, Project No. TR218/18-1 / WI3180/3-1). The authors are grateful to BMU and DFG for the financial support. All tests have been performed by the technicians H. Borowski, P. Gölz and N. Demiral in the IBF soil mechanics laboratory.

References

  1. 1.
    Arangelovski G, Towhata I (2004) Accumulated deformation of sand with initial shear stress and effective stress state lying near failure conditions. Soils Found 44(6):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baki AL, Rahman MM, Lo SR, Gnanendran CT (2012) Linkage between static and cyclic liquefaction of loose sand with a range of fines contents. Can Geotech J 49:891–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baki MAL, Rahman MM, Lo SR (2014) Predicting onset of cyclic instability of loose sand with fines using instability curves. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 61–62(3):140–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bauer E (1996) Calibration of a comprehensive constitutive equation for granular materials. Soils Found 36:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Been K, Jefferies MG (1985) A state parameter for sands. Géotechnique 35(1):99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bishop AW, Green GE (1965) The influence of end restraint on the compression strength of a cohesionless soil. Géotechnique 15(3):243–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bouckovalas GD, Andrianopoulos KI, Papadimitriou AG (2003) A critical state interpretation for the cyclic liquefaction of silty sands. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 23:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boulanger RW (2003) High overburden stress effects in liquefaction analyses. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE 129(12):1071–1082MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen YC, Liao TS (1999) Studies of the state parameter and liquefaction resistance of sand. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 513–518Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chiaro G, Koseki J, Sato T (2012) Effects of initial static shear on liquefaction and large deformation properties of loose saturated Toyoura sand in undrained cyclic torsional shear tests. Soils Found 52(3):498–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dafalias Y, Papadimitriou A, Li X (2004) Sand plasticity model accounting for inherent fabric anisotropy. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 130(11):1319–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dafalias Y, Manzari M (2004) Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 130(6):622–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dash HK, Sitharam TG, Baudet BA (2010) Influence of non-plastic fines on the response of a silty sand to cyclic loading. Soils Found 50(5):695–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DIN 18126: Bestimmung der Dichte nichtbindiger Böden bei lockerster und dichtester Lagerung, 1996Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flora A, Lirer S, Silvestri F (2012) Undrained cyclic resistance of undisturbed gravelly soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 43:366–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fuentes W (2014) Contributions in mechanical modelling of fill material. Dissertation, Veröffentlichungen des Institutes für Bodenmechanik und Felsmechanik am Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Heft 179Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Georgiannou VN, Konstadinou M (2014) Effects of density on cyclic behaviour of anisotropically consolidated Ottawa sand under undrained torsional loading. Géotechnique 64(4):287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Georgiannou VN, Tsomokos A (2008) Comparison of two fine sands under torsional loading. Can Geotech J 45:1659–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghionna VN, Porcino D (2006) Liquefaction resistance of undisturbed and reconstituted samples of a natural coarse sand from undrained triaxial tests. J Geotech Geoenvir Eng ASCE 132(2):194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hatanaka M, Uchida A, Ohara J (1997) Liquefaction characteristics of a gravelly fill liquefied during the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu earthquake. Soils Found 37(3):107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hatanaka M, Feng L, Matsumura N, Yasu H (2008) A study on the engineering properties of sand improved by the sand compaction pile method. Soils Found 48(1):73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Herle I (1997) Hypoplastizität und Granulometrie einfacher Korngerüste. Promotion, Institut für Bodenmechanik und Felsmechanik der Universität Fridericiana in Karlsruhe, Heft Nr. 142Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huang A-B, Chuang S-Y (2011) Correlating cyclic strength with fines contents through state parameters. Soils Found 51(6):991–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hyodo M, Murata H, Yasufuku N, Fujii T (1991) Undrained cyclic shear strength and residual shear strain of saturated sand by cyclic triaxial tests. Soils Found 31(3):60–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hyodo M, Tanimizu H, Yasufuku N, Murata H (1994) Undrained cyclic and monotonic triaxial behaviour of saturated loose sand. Soils Found 34(1):19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hyodo M, Hyde AFL, Aramaki N (1998) Liquefaction of crushable soils. Géotechnique 48(4):527–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hyodo M, Hyde AFL, Aramaki N, Nakata Y (2002) Undrained monotonic and cyclic shear behaviour of sand under low and high confining stresses. Soils Found 42(3):63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kiyota T, Sato T, Koseki J, Abadimarand M (2008) Behavior of liquefied sands under extremely large strain levels in cyclic torsional shear tests. Soils Found 48(5):727–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kiyota T, Koseki J, Sato T (2013) Relationship between limiting shear strain and reduction of shear moduli due to liquefaction in large strain torsional shear tests. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 49:122–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kokusho T, Hara T, Hiraoka R (2004) Undrained shear strength of granular soils with different particle gradations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 130(6):621–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Konstadinou M, Georgiannou VN (2013) Cyclic behaviour of loose anisotropically consolidated Ottawa sand under undrained torsional loading. Géotechnique 63(13):1144–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Matsuoka H, Nakai T (1982) A new failure criterion for soils in three-dimensional stresses. In: Deformation and failure of granular materials. Proc. IUTAM Symp. in Delft. pp. 253–263Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Niemunis A (2003) Extended hypoplastic models for soils. Habilitation, Veröffentlichungen des Institutes für Grundbau und Bodenmechanik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Heft Nr. 34. Available from www.pg.gda.pl/~aniem/an-liter.html
  34. 34.
    Niemunis A (2008) Incremental Driver User’s manual. Available from www.pg.gda.pl/~aniem/an-liter.html
  35. 35.
    Niemunis A, Wichtmann T, Triantafyllidis T (2005) A high-cycle accumulation model for sand. Comput Geotech 32(4):245–263CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Niemunis A, Herle I (1997) Hypoplastic model for cohesionless soils with elastic strain range. Mech Cohes-Frict Mater 2:279–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Oda M, Kawamoto K, Suzuki K, Fujimori H, Sato M (2001) Microstructural interpretation on reliquefaction of saturated granular soils under cyclic loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 127(5):416–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oka F, Yashima A, Tateishi A, Taguchi Y, Yamashita S (1999) A cyclic elasto-plastic constitutive model for sand considering a plastic-strain dependence of the shear modulus. Géotechnique 49(5):661–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Porcino D, Caridi G, Ghionna VN (2008) Undrained monotonic and cyclic simple shear behaviour of carbonate sand. Géotechnique 58(8):635–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sharma SS, Ismail M (2006) Monotonic and cyclic behavior of two calcareous soils of different origins. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 132(12):1581–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sivathayalan S, Ha D (2011) Effect of static shear stress on the cyclic resistance of sands in simple shear loading. Can Geotech J 48:1471–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stamatopoulos CA, Stamatopoulos AC, Balla LN (2004) Cyclic strength of sands in terms of the state parameter. In: The 11th international conference on soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (11th ICSD) and the 3rd international conference on geotechnical earthquake engineeringGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stamatopoulos CA (2010) An experimental study of the liquefaction strength of silty sands in terms of the state parameter. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(2):662–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sze HY, Yang J (2014) Failure modes of sand in undrained cyclic loading: impact of sample preparation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 140(1):152–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tatsuoka F, Maeda S, Ochi K, Fujii S (1986) Prediction of cyclic undrained strength of sand subjected to irregular loadings. Soils Found 26(2):73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tatsuoka F, Toki S, Miura S, Kato H, Okamoto M, Yamada S-I, Yasuda S, Tanizawa F (1986) Some factors affecting cyclic undrained triaxial strength of sand. Soils Found 26(3):99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vaid YP, Chung EKF, Kuerbis RH (1989) Preshearing and undrained response of sands. Soils Found 29(4):49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vaid YP, Chern JC (1983) Effect of static shear on resistance to liquefaction. Soils Found 28(1):47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vaid YP, Sivathayalan S (2000) Fundamental factors affecting liquefaction susceptibility of sands. Can Geotech J 37:592–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Verdugo R, Ishihara K (1996) The steady state of sandy soils. Soils Found 36(2):81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    von Wolffersdorff P-A (1996) A hypoplastic relation for granular materials with a predefined limit state surface. Mech Cohes-Frict Mater 1:251–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wichtmann T (2015). www.torsten-wichtmann.de. Homepage
  53. 53.
    Wichtmann T, Niemunis A, Triantafyllidis T, Poblete M (2005) Correlation of cyclic preloading with the liquefaction resistance. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(12):923–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wichtmann T, Niemunis A, Triantafyllidis T (2013) On the “elastic stiffness” in a high-cycle accumulation model—continued investigations. Can Geotech J 50(12):1260–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wichtmann T, Triantafyllidis T (2014) An experimental data base for the development, calibration and verification of constitutive models for sand with focus to cyclic loading. Part II: tests with strain cycles and combined loading. Acta Geotechnica (submitted)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wichtmann T, Triantafyllidis T (2014) Stress attractors predicted by a high-cycle accumulation model confirmed by undrained cyclic triaxial tests. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 69(2):125–137Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wijewickreme D, Sriskandakumar S, Byrne P (2005) Cyclic loading response of loose air-pluviated Fraser River sand for validation of numerical models simulating centrifuge tests. Can Geotech J 42:550–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wong RT, Seed HB, Chan CK (1975) Cyclic loading liquefaction of gravelly soils. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 101(6):571–583Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Xenaki VC, Athanasopoulos GA (2003) Liquefaction resistance of sand–silt mixtures: an experimental investigation of the effects of fines. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23:183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Yamada S, Takamori T, Sato K (2010) Effects on reliquefaction resistance produced by changes in anisotropy during liquefaction. Soils Found 50(1):9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Yamashita S, Toki S (1993) Effects of fabric anisotropy of sand on cyclic undrained triaxial and torsional strengths. Soils Found 33(3):92–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yang J, Sze HY (2011) Cyclic behaviour and resistance of saturated sand under non-symmetrical loading conditions. Géotechnique 61(1):59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Yang J, Sze HY (2011) Cyclic strength of sand under sustained shear stress. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 137(12):1275–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yasuda S, Soga M (1984) Effects of frequency on undrained strength of sands (in Japanese). Proc 19th Nat Conf Soil Mech Found Eng, pp 549–550Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Yoshimi Y, Oh-Oka H (1975) Influence of degree of shear stress reversal on the liquefaction potential of saturated sand. Soils Found 15(3):27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zhang J-M, Shamoto Y, Tokimatsu K (1997) Moving critical and phase-transformation stress state lines of saturated sand during undrained cyclic shear. Soils Found 37(2):51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Zhang J-M, Wang G (2012) Large post-liquefaction deformation of sand, part I: physical mechanism, constitutive description and numerical algorithm. Acta Geotechnica 7:69–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Soil Mechanics and Rock Mechanics (IBF)Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations