Seismic interaction of underground RC ducts and neighboring bridge piers in liquefiable soil foundation
A coupled system of an underground reinforced concrete (RC) duct and a neighboring bridge pier supported by group piles is numerically investigated in sandy soil at both drained and undrained liquefiable states under seismic ground excitations. Parametric studies are conducted to evaluate influencing factors on seismic performances of these neighboring interactive structural systems. The numerical simulations are performed with the finite element code COM3 (COncrete Model for 3D) (Maekawa, Pimanmas and Okamura in Nonlinear mechanics of reinforced concrete, 2003), which is capable of simulation of inelastic performance of RC structure and high nonlinearity of soil medium, especially on the liquefiable loose sand. It is mechanically pointed out that liquefaction-induced uplift of underground ducts is substantially influenced by the presence of on-ground bridges. Alternatively, inertial forces induced to the on-ground bridge pier are also noticeably affected by the presence of the neighboring underground RC duct. It is pointed in practice of design that these nonlinear interacting responses between these neighboring infrastructures are greatly magnified on liquefiable soil foundations.
KeywordsLiquefiable soil On-ground bridge pier Seismic performance Structure–soil–structure interaction Underground RC duct
This study was financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 23226011.
- 6.Foster S, Vecchio F, Maekawa K (2008) Practitioners’ guide for finite element modeling of reinforced structures. The state-of-art report, FIB bulletin no. 45, 1st edn. Sprint-Digital-Druck, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
- 10.Iguchi M (1978) Dynamic interaction of soil-structure with elastic rectangular foundation. In: Proceedings of the 5th Japanese earthquake engineering symposium, Tokyo, pp 457–464Google Scholar
- 11.Isoda S, Nakai N, Orense R, Towhata I (2001) Mitigation of liquefaction-induced uplift of underground structure by using sheet pile wall. In: Proceedings of the soil improvement conference, Singapore, pp 70–77Google Scholar
- 14.Kato B (1979) Mechanical properties of steel under load cycles idealizing seismic action. In: AICAP–CEB symposium: structural concrete under seismic action, CEB bulletin information, pp 7–27Google Scholar
- 16.Kita H, Iida T, Nishitani M, Noda S (1992) Experimental study on countermeasures for liquefaction by steel piles with drain. In: Proceedings of the 10th world conference in earthquake engineering, Rotterdam, pp 1701–1706Google Scholar
- 18.Li B, Maekawa K, Okamura H (1989) Contact density model for stress transfer across crack in concrete. J Fac Eng Univ Tokyo 40(1):9–52Google Scholar
- 21.Luco JE, Contesse L (1973) Dynamic structure–soil–structure interaction. Bull Seismol Soc Am 63(4):1289–1303Google Scholar
- 23.Maekawa K, Pimanmas A, Okamura H (2003) Nonlinear mechanics of reinforced concrete. Spon Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 28.Masing G (1926) Eigenspannungen and verfestigungbeim messing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international congress of the applied mechanics, Zurich, pp 332–335Google Scholar
- 29.Murakami H, Luco JE (1977) Seismic response of a periodic array of structures. J Eng Mech (ASCE) 103(5):965–977Google Scholar
- 35.Towhata I, Ishihara K (1985) Modeling soil behaviors under principal stress axes rotation. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on numerical method in geomechanics, Nagoya, pp 523–530Google Scholar
- 39.Wong HL, Trifunac MD (1975) Two-dimensional, antiplane, building–soil–building interaction for two or more buildings and for incident plane SH waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(6):1863–1885Google Scholar