Skip to main content

A BEM investigation on the influence of underground cavities on the seismic response of canyons

Acta Geotechnica volume 11, pages 391–413 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Two-dimensional site effects caused by cavities under topographical functions can considerably impact the seismic reaction of the ground surface. Due to the complexity of scattering issues by topographical features above subterranean cavity, few studies have been done in this field. In the present study, the seismic response of semi-sine-shaped canyons above a subterranean cavity (hole) of different dimensions, depths and locations is examined. The medium is assumed to have a linear elastic constitutive behavior exposed to vertically propagating incident SV and P waves. All calculations are performed using the direct boundary element technique in the time domain. It is observed that a cavity below a canyon can considerably change the ground response of the surface in different periodic bands. The seismic interaction between canyon and cavity with respect to various geometrical parameters will lead to different amplification patterns in the center and edge of the canyon. One of the most important results is the increase in amplification of long periods compared with the case of a canyon without cavity. Moreover, parametric research shows the fact that the cavity detail and canyon height, the ratio of cavity to the canyon size and cavity location impact on the seismic amplification of the canyon surface. Finally, spectral amplification coefficients of the canyon surface led by the cavity are reported for different cases of the canyon–cavity interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

References

  1. Ahmad S, Banerjee PK (1988) Multi-domain BEM for two-dimensional problems of elastodynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 26:891–911

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Aki K, Larner K (1970) Surface motion of a layered medium having an irregular interface due to incident plane SH waves. J Geophys Res 75:933–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alielahi H (2012) Using time-domain BEM for evaluating seismic interaction between underground cavities and topographic features. PhD dissertation, Science and Research Branch Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

  4. Alielahi H, Kamalian M, Asgari Marnani J, Jafari MK, Panji M (2013) Applying a time-domain boundary element method for study of seismic ground response in the vicinity of embedded cylindrical cavity. Int J Civil Eng 11(1):45–54

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alielahi H, Kamalian M, Adampira M (2015) Seismic ground amplification by unlined tunnels subjected to vertically propagating SV and P waves using BEM. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 71:63–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aviles J, Perez-Rocha LE (1998) Site effects and soil structure interaction in the valley of Mexico. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 17:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beskos DE (1987) Boundary element methods in dynamic analysis. Appl Mech Rev 40(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Borcherdt RD (1994) Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification). Earthq Spectra 10:617–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouchon M (1973) Effect of topography on surface motion. Bull Seism Soc Am 63:615–632

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brebbia CA, Dominguez J (1989) Boundary elements an introductory course. Computational Mechanics Publication, Southampton

  11. Carrer JAM, Mansur WJ (2004) Alternative time-marching schemes for elastodynamic analysis with the domain boundary element method formulation. Comput Mech 34:387–399

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Chuhan Z, Yuntao R, Pekao OA, Feng J (2004) Time-domain boundary element method for underground structures in orthotropic media. J Eng Mech 130(1):105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crichlow JM (1982) The effect of underground structure on seismic motions of the ground surface. Geophys J R Astr SOC 70:563–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Barros FCP, Luco JE (1993) Diffraction of obliquely incident waves by a cylindrical cavity embedded in a layered viscoelastic half-space. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 12:159–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dineva P, Parvanova S, Vasilev G, Wuttke F (2014) Seismic soil-tunnels interaction via BEM part ii. Numerical results. J Theor Appl Mech 44(4):29–50

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Dominguez J, Gallego R (1991) The time domain boundary element method for elastodynamic problems. Math Comput Model 15(3–5):119–129

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Gazetas G, Dakoulas P (1992) Seismic analysis and design of rock fill dams: state-of-the-art. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 11:27–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gizzi FT, Masini N (2006) Historical damage pattern and differential seismic effects in a town with ground cavities: a case study from Southern Italy. Eng Geol 88:41–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grasso S, Maugeri M (2009) The road map for seismic risk analysis in a Mediterranean city. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:1034–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hadely PK, Askar A, Cakmak AS (1989) Scattering of waves by inclusions in a non-homogeneous elastic half space solved by boundary element method. Tech Rep NCEER 89:0027

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hatzigeorgiou GD, Beskos DE (2001) Transient dynamic response of 3-D elastoplastic structures by the D/BEM. In: Beskos DE, Brebbia CA, Katsikadelis JT, Manolis GD (eds) Proceedings of the XXIII international conference on the boundary element method, Lemnos, Greece

  22. Israil ASM, Banerjee PK (1990) Advanced time domain formulation of BEM for two-dimensional transient elastodynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 29:1421–1440

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Israil ASM, Banerjee PK (1990) Two-dimensional transient wave propagation by time domain BEM. Int J Solids Struct 26:851–864

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Israil ASM, Banerjee PK (1992) Advanced development of boundary element method for two-dimensional dynamic elasto-plasticity. Int J Solids Struct 29:1433–1451

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Jain DL, Kanwal RP (1979) Scattering of elastic P and SV waves by a rigid elliptic cylindrical inclusion. Int J Eng Sci 17:941–954

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Kamalian M, Gatmiri B, Sohrabi-Bidar A (2003) On time-domain two-dimensional site response analysis of topographic structures by BEM. J Seismol Earthq Eng 5:35–45

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kamalian M, Jafari MK, Sohrabi-Bidar A, Razmkhah A, Gatmiri B (2006) Time-domain two-dimensional site response analysis of non-homogeneous topographic structures by a hybrid FE/BE method. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26(8):753–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kamalian M, Gatmiri B, Sohrabi-Bidar A, Khalaj A (2007) Amplification pattern of 2D semi-sine-shaped valleys subjected to vertically propagating incident waves. Commun Numer Meth Eng 23:871–887

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Katsikadelis JT (2002) Boundary elements: theory and applications. Elsevier Science Ltd, New York

  30. Kawase H (1988) Time-domain response of a semi-circular canyon for incident P SV and Rayleigh waves calculated by the discrete wave number boundary element method. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78:1415–1437

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kawase H, Aki K (1989) A Study of the response of a soft basin for incident S P and Rayleigh waves with special reference to the long duration observed in Mexico City. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79:1361–1382

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kontoni DPN, Beskos DE (1993) Transient dynamic elastoplastic analysis by the dual reciprocity BEM. Eng Anal Bound Element 12:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee VW (1977) On deformations near a circular underground cavity subjected to incident plane SH-waves. In: Proceedings of the application of computer methods in engineering conference vol II. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, pp 951–962

  34. Lee VW (1988) Three-dimensional diffraction of elastic waves by a spherical cavity in an elastic half-space I: closed form solutions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 7(3):149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee VW, Karl J (1993) Diffraction of SV waves by underground circular cylindrical cavities. Int J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 11(8):445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee VW, Manoogian ME (1995) Surface motion above an arbitrarily shaped underground cavity for incident SH-waves. J Eur Assoc Earthq Eng 8:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lee VW, Trifunac MD (1979) Response of tunnels to incident SH-waves. J Eng Mech Div 105(4):643–659

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lee VW, Chen S, Hsu IR (1999) Antiplane diffraction from canyon above a subsurface unlined tunnel. ASCE J Eng Mech 25(6):668–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee VW, Manoogian ME, Chen S (2002) Antiplane SH-deformations near a surface rigid foundation above a subsurface rigid circular tunnel. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 1(1):27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Liang JW, Liu ZX (2009) Diffraction of plane SV waves by a cavity in poroelastic half-space. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 8(1):29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liang J, Zhang H, Lee VW (2003) A Series solution for surface motion amplification due to underground twin tunnels incident SV waves. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 2(2):289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu Q, Zhao M, Wang L (2013) Scattering of plane P SV or Rayleigh waves by a shallow lined tunnel in an elastic half space. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 49:52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Luco JE, De Barros FCP (1994) Dynamic displacements and stresses in the vicinity of a cylindrical cavity embedded in a half space. Earth Eng Struc Dyn 23:321–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Manoogian ME (2000) Scattering and diffraction of SH waves above an arbitrarily shaped tunnel. SET J Earthq Technol 37(1–3):11–26

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mansur WJ (1983) A time-stepping technique to solve wave propagation problems using the boundary element method. PhD Dissertation Southampton University

  46. Marrero M, Dominguez J (2003) Numerical behavior of time domain BEM for three-dimensional transient elastodynamic problems. Eng Anal Bound Elem 27:39–48

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Ohtsuki A, Harumi K (1983) Effect of topography and subsurface in homogeneities on seismic SV waves. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 11:441–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Partridge PW, Brebbia CA, Wrobel LC (1992) The dual reciprocity boundary element method. Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton and Boston

  49. Parvanova SL, Dineva PS, Manolis GD, Wuttke F (2014) Seismic response of lined tunnels in the half-plane with surface topography. Bull Earthq Eng 12(2):981–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Rodrıguez-Castellanos A, Luzónb F, Sanchez-Sesma FJ (2005) Diffraction of seismic waves in an elastic cracked half plane using a boundary integral formulation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:827–837

  51. Rodrıguez-Castellanos A, Sanchez-Sesma FJ, Luzon F, Martin R (2006) Multiple scattering of elastic waves by subsurface fractures and cavities. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(4A):1359–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sanchez-Sesma FJ (1985) Diffraction of elastic SH waves by wedges. Bull Seism Soc Am 75(5):1435–1446

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sanchez-Sesma FJ (1987) Site effects on strong ground motion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 6(2):124–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sanchez-Sesma FJ (1990) Elementary Solutions for response of a wedge-shaped medium to incident SH and SV waves. Bull Seism Soc Am 80(3):737–742

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sgarlato G, Lombardo G, Rigano R (2011) Evaluation of seismic site response nearby underground cavities using earthquake and ambient noise recordings: a case study in Catania area, Italy. Soil Eng Geol 122:281–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sica S, Russo AD, Rotili F, Simonelli AL (2014) Ground motion amplification due to shallow cavities in nonlinear soils. Nat Hazards 71:1913–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Smerzini C, Aviles J, Sanchez-Sesma FJ, Paolucci R (2008) Analytical solutions for the seismic response of underground structures under SH wave propagation. American Institute of Physics

  58. Smerzini C, Aviles J, Sanchez-Sesma FJ, Paolucci R (2009) Effect of underground cavities on surface earthquake ground motion under SH wave propagation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38(12):1441–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Soares D Jr, Mansur WJ (2007) An efficient stabilized boundary element formulation for 2D time-domain acoustics and elastodynamics. Comput Mech 40:355–365

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Sohrabi-Bidar A, Kamalian M, Jafari MK (2010) Seismic response of 3-D Gaussian-shaped canyons to vertically propagating incident waves. Geophys J Int 183:1429–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Trifunac MD (1972) Scattering of plane SH waves by a semi-cylindrical canyon. Earth Eng Struct Dyn 1:267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Wang G, Dai1 L, Liu D (2007) A study on the scattering field of SH-waves in a Topographical Area Consisting of a Semi-Cylindrical Hill and a Subsurface Horizontal Hole Proc IMechE Vol 221 Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics

  63. Wang L, Luo Y, Xu Y (2012) Numerical investigation of Rayleigh-wave propagation on topography surface. J Appl Geophys 86:88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wong HL, Trifunac MD (1974) Surface motion of a semi-elliptical alluvial canyon for incident plane SH waves. Bull Seism Soc Am 64:1389–1408

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wong HL, Trifunac MD (1974) Scattering of plane SH waves by a semi-elliptical canyon. Earth Eng Struct Dyn 3:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Yiouta-Mitra P, Kouretzis G, Bouckovalas G, Sofianos A (2007) Effect of underground structures in earthquake resistant design of surface structures Dynamic Response and Soil Properties Geo-Denver: New Peaks in Geotechnics

  67. Yu CH, Dravinski M (2009) Scattering of plane harmonic P SV or Rayleigh waves by a completely embedded corrugated cavity. Geophys J Int 178(1):479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhang C, Zhao C (1988) Effects of canyon topography and geological conditions on strong ground motion. Earth Eng Struct Dyn 16:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhao C, Valliappan S (1993) Incident P and SV wave scattering effects under different canyon topographic and geological conditions. Int J Num Anal Methods Geomech 17(2):73–94

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geotechnical Engineering Group, Department of Civil Engineering, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahid Mansoori St, Moallem St, 4515658145, Zanjan, Iran

    Hamid Alielahi

  2. Geotechnical Engineering Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

    Mohsen Kamalian

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Adampira

Authors
  1. Hamid Alielahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohsen Kamalian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Adampira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamid Alielahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alielahi, H., Kamalian, M. & Adampira, M. A BEM investigation on the influence of underground cavities on the seismic response of canyons. Acta Geotech. 11, 391–413 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0387-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0387-7

Keywords

  • Amplification pattern
  • Boundary element method (BEM)
  • Seismic response
  • Semi-sine-shaped canyon
  • Time domain
  • Underground cavity