Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in permeability of sand during triaxial loading: effect of fine particles production

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various mechanisms can affect the permeability of dense unconsolidated sands: Volumetric dilation can lead to permeability increase, whereas strain localization in shear bands may increase or decrease the permeability depending on the state of compaction and on the level of grains breakage inside the band. To investigate these various mechanisms, an experimental study has been performed to explore the effect of different factors such as grain size and grain shape, confining pressure, level of shear, stress path, and formation of one or several shear bands on the permeability of dense sands under triaxial loading. The experimental results show a reduction of permeability during the consolidation phase and during the volumetric contraction phase of shear loading, which can be related to the decrease of porosity. The experimental results also show that, depending on the confining pressure, the permeability remains stable or decreases during the volumetric dilation phase despite the increase of total porosity. This permeability reduction is attributed to the presence of fine particles, which result from grains attrition during pre-localization and grains breakage inside the shear band during the post-localization phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andò E, Viggiani G, Hall SA, Desrues J (2013) Experimental micro-mechanics of granular media studied by X-ray tomography: recent results and challenges. Géotech Lett 3:142–146. doi:10.1680/geolett.13.00036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benahmed N, Canou J, Dupla JC (2004) Structure initiale et propriétés de liquéfaction statique d’un sable. C R Méc 332(11):887–894

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Crawford BR, Gooch MJ, Webb DW (2004) Textural controls on constitutive behavior in unconsolidated sands: micromechanics and cap plasticity. Proceedings of 6th Int. Conf. North American Rock Mechanics Symposium (NARMS). American Rock Mechanics Association, ARMA/NARMS 04-611

  4. Feda J (2002) Notes on the effect of grain crushing on the granular soil behaviour. Eng Geol 63(1):93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feia S, Ghabezloo S, Bruchon JF, Sulem J, Canou J, Dupla JF (2014) Experimental evaluation of the pore-access size distribution of sands. Geotech Test J 37(4):1–8. doi:10.1520/GTJ20130126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen VH (2012) Compaction des roches réservoirs peu ou non consolidées: impacts sur les propriétés de transport. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Cergy-Pontoise, France

  7. Olson JE, Yaich E, Holder J (2009) Permeability changes due to shear dilatancy in uncemented sands. Proceedings of US Rock Mechanics/Geomechnics Symp. 28th June–1st July, Asheville, NC, US

  8. Rechenmacher AL, Finno RJ (2004) Digital image correlation to evaluate shear banding in dilative sands. Geotech Test J 27(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Scott J, Proskin S, Adhikary D (1994) Volume and permeability changes associated with steam stimulation in an oil sands reservoir. J Can Pet Technol. doi:10.2118/94-07-06

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wong RCK (2000) Shear deformation of locked sand in triaxial compression. Geotech Test J 23(2):158

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge TOTAL for supporting this research. They wish also to thank Irina Andria-Ntoanina, Sara Assandi and Pierre-François Marty for their assistance in the experimental program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sadok Feia.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Correction of the measured permeability taking into account the deformed specimen shape

In the performed constant head permeability tests, the hydraulic conductivity of the specimen is evaluated using Darcy’s law for a one-dimensional flow, k = QL/SΔH, where Q is the water discharge, S is the section of the specimen, ΔH is the hydraulic load, and L is the length of the specimen. During shearing phase, due to deformation and barreling of the specimen, the flow lines are modified and it is necessary to correct the evaluated permeability. This is done by introducing a correction factor obtained from a numerical modeling of the fluid flow in the deformed specimen. Figure 23 shows the geometry of the finite element axisymmetric model of the specimen with length L and a barrel shape defined by the radius R + e of the middle cross section (Fig. 23). The upper and lower sections of the specimen are assumed to keep the initial radius R. The material is assumed to be homogeneous and isotropic, i.e., k x  = k y  = k, k xy  = 0.

Fig. 23
figure 23

Geometry, finite element mesh, and flow lines in the deformed specimen

Several constant head permeability experiments have been simulated for different values of e, and the permeability k′ is calculated and compared with the real material permeability k. Figure 24 shows that the ratio k/k can be fitted with a linear trend:

Fig. 24
figure 24

Variation of the ratio of the measured permeability k′ on the actual permeability (corrected) k with e/R

$$ \frac{{k^{\prime } }}{k} = 1 + 1.25\frac{e}{R} $$
(2)

The above correction factor is applied to the measured permeabilities during the triaxial tests. From the measurement of the volume V of the deformed specimen given by the volumeter, the barreling parameter e is calculated from the following relation:

$$ V = \pi R^{2} L + \uppi{e}\left( {\frac{{e^{2} }}{3} + \frac{{L^{2} }}{4}} \right) $$
(3)

The correction of the measured permeability is of the order of 5 % with a maximum of 10 % at large strains.

Appendix 2: Strain–stress curves of the triaxial tests under constant confining pressure

Figure 25 presents the strain–stress curves of the triaxial tests under constant confining pressure.

Fig. 25
figure 25

Mechanical response for all specimens subjected to a classical triaxial path with constant confining pressure. a Deviatoric stress–axial strain curves. b Volumetric strain–axial strain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feia, S., Sulem, J., Canou, J. et al. Changes in permeability of sand during triaxial loading: effect of fine particles production. Acta Geotech. 11, 1–19 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0351-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0351-y

Keywords

Navigation