Skip to main content
Log in

A hypoplastic macroelement model for shallow foundations under monotonic and cyclic loads

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, a macroelement for shallow foundations on sands has been developed based on the theory of hypoplasticity. The incrementally nonlinear constitutive equations of the macromodel are defined in terms of generalized forces and displacements and are constructed based on the general approach proposed by Niemunis (Extended Hypoplastic Models for Soils. Habilitation Thesis, Bochum University, 2002). A suitable vectorial internal variable—mimicking the concept of intergranular strain introduced by Niemunis and Herle (Mech Cohes Frict Mater 2:279–299, 1997) for continuum hypoplasticity—is employed to provide the model sufficient memory of past displacement history to be able to reproduce the observed behavior under cyclic loading paths. As compared to similar macroelements formulated within the framework of the theory of elastoplasticity, the proposed approach has the advantage of a much simpler mathematical structure, which allows a straightforward implementation in existing structural analysis FE codes. The model performance has then been evaluated by comparing the model predictions with available experimental results from a series of small-scale model tests reported by Nova and Montrasio (Géotechnique 41:243–256, 1991). Overall, the model captures reasonably well the observed response under nonproportional, complex loading paths. A series of simulations reproducing the tests performed by di Prisco et al. (Shallow footing under cyclic loading: experimental behaviour and constitutive modelling. Patron, Bologna, 2003) has also demonstrated the potential of the proposed model to simulate the observed behavior of footings under cyclic loading paths, at least from a qualitative point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brinch-Hansen J (1970) A revised and extended formula for bearing capacity. Danish Geotech Institute Bull 98:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  2. Byrne BW, Houlsby GT (2003) Foundations for offshore wind turbines. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 361:1257–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chatzigogos CT, Pecker A, Salencon J (2008) Macroelement modelling of shallow foundations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crémer C, Pecker A, Davenne L (2001) Cyclic macro-element for soil-structure interaction: material and geometrical non-linearities. Int J Num Anal Meth Geomech 25:1257–1284

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Crémer C, Pecker A, Davenne L (2002) Modelling of nonlinear dynamic behaviour of a shallow strip foundation with macro-element. J Earthq Eng 6:175–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Darve F (1978) Une formulation incrémentale des lois rhéologiques. application aux sols. PhD thesis, INP Grenoble

  7. di Prisco C, Massimino MR, Maugeri M, Nicolosi M, Nova R (2006) Cyclic numerical analysis of Noto Cathedral: soil-structure interaction modelling. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica 48:49–64

    Google Scholar 

  8. di Prisco C, Nova R, Sibilia A (2003) Shallow footing under cyclic loading: experimental behaviour and constitutive modelling. In: Maugeri M, Nova R (eds) Geotechnical analysis of the seismic vulnerability of historical monuments. Patron, Bologna, pp 99–122

  9. Gottardi G, Houlsby GT, Butterfield R (1999) The plastic response of circular footings on sand under general planar loading. Géotechnique 49:453–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grange S (2007) Modélisation simplifiée 3d de l’interaction sol-structure: application au génie parasismique. PhD thesis, INP Grenoble

  11. Grange S, Kotronis P, Mazars J (2008) A macro-element for a circular foundation to simulate 3d soil-structure interaction. Int J Num Anal Meth Geomech 32:1205–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Houlsby GT, Cassidy MJ (2002) A plasticity model for the behaviour of footings on sand under combined loading. Géotechnique 52:117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kolymbas D (1991) An outline of hypoplasticity. Arch Appl Mech 61:143–151

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Pape Y, Sieffert J-G (2001) Application of thermodynamics to the global modelling of shallow foundations on frictional material. Int J Num Anal Meth Geomech 25:1377–1408

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin CM, Houlsby GT (2001) Combined loading of spudcan foundations on clay: numerical modelling. Géotechnique 51:687–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Meyerhof GG (1951) The ultimate bearing capacity of foundations. Géotechnique 2:301–332

    Google Scholar 

  17. Milovic DM, Touzot G, Tournier JP (1970) Stresses and displacements in an elastic layer due to inclined and eccentric load over rigid strip. Géotechnique 20:231–252

    Google Scholar 

  18. Montrasio L, Nova R (1997) Settlements of shallow foundations on sand: geometrical effects. Géotechnique 47:49–60

    Google Scholar 

  19. Niemunis A (2002) Extended hypoplastic models for soils. Habilitation Thesis. Bochum University

  20. Niemunis A, Herle I (1997) Hypoplastic model for cohesionless soils with elastic strain range. Mech Cohes Frict Mater 2:279–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nova R, Montrasio L (1991) Analysis of settlements of shallow foundations on sand. In: 10th European conference on soil mechanics. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 505–509

  22. Nova R, Montrasio L (1991b) Settlements of shallow foundations on sand. Géotechnique 41:243–256

    Google Scholar 

  23. Poulos HG, Carter JP, Small JC (2001) Foundations and retaining structures—research and practice. In: Proceedings of 15th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1–80

  24. Tamagnini C, Viggiani G, Chambon R (2000a) A review of two different approaches to hypoplasticity. In: Kolymbas D (ed) Constitutive modelling of granular materials. Springer, Berlin, pp 107–146

  25. Tamagnini C, Viggiani G, Chambon R, Desrues J (2000b) Evaluation of different strategies for the integration of hypoplastic constitutive equations: application to the CLoE model. Mech Cohes Frict Mater 5:263–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vesic AS (1975) Bearing capacity of shallow foundations. In: Winterkorn HF, Fang HY (eds) Foundation engineering handbook. Van Nostrand, New York

  27. von Wolffersdorff PA (1996) A hypoplastic relation for granular materials with a predefined limit state surface. Mech Cohes Frict Mater 1:251–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu W, Kolymbas D (2000) Hypoplasticity then and now. In: Kolymbas D (ed) Constitutive modelling of granular materials. Springer, Berlin, pp 57–106

Download references

Acknowledgements

The help of Mr. Carmine Pacelli in calibrating the model and running the numerical simulations presented in the paper is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Salciarini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salciarini, D., Tamagnini, C. A hypoplastic macroelement model for shallow foundations under monotonic and cyclic loads. Acta Geotech. 4, 163–176 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-009-0087-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-009-0087-2

Keywords

Navigation