Experimental and numerical investigation of a solar eductor-assisted low-pressure water desalination system


Greenhouse solar-energy driven desalination technology is potentially well suited for supplying water and small scale irrigation in remote and/or rural areas, and for avoiding over-exploitation of available water resources. The efficiency and productivity of these systems are however low, in part because the heat of evaporation has to be transferred as waste heat to ambient air during condensation. In order to maximize energy regeneration during condensation we propose an educator based system that lowers the evaporation process temperature by reducing pressure. The feasibility of the educator assisted passive solar desalination system is investigated using a detailed computational fluid dynamics analysis complemented by experiments. The study focuses in particular on the ability of the new design to lower the required evaporation temperature and thereby reduce the energy intensity of the process. Two configurations, with open and closed educator, are investigated and a detailed analysis of the thermofluid processes is presented. The configuration with a closed educator installed outside the evaporation chamber shows very promising performance. The proposed system can maintain the maximum temperature and pressure in the evaporation chamber below the desirable temperature and pressure thresholds (30 °C and 5 kPa). The analysis and experimental data also show it is possible to further reduce energy requirements by reducing the motive water flow rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19


  1. 1.

    UN Water (2014) The United Nations world water development report 2014: water and energy. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bogardi JJ, Dudgeon D, Lawford R et al (2012) Water security for a planet under pressure: interconnected challenges of a changing world call for sustainable solutions. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gössling S, Peeters P, Hall CM et al (2012) Tourism and water use: supply, demand, and security. An international review. Tour Manag 33:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kalogirou SA (2005) Seawater desalination using renewable energy sources. Prog Energy Combust Sci 31:242–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Burn S, Hoang M, Zarzo D et al (2015) Desalination techniques—a review of the opportunities for desalination in agriculture. Desalination 364:2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mahmoudi H, Spahis N, Abdul-Wahab SA et al (2010) Improving the performance of a seawater Greenhouse desalination system by assessment of simulation models for different condensers. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:2182–2188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Anderson MA, Cudero AL, Palma J (2010) Capacitive deionization as an electrochemical means of saving energy and delivering clean water. Comparison to present desalination practices: will it compete? Electrochim Acta 55:3845–3856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wang LK, Chen JP, Hung YT et al (2011) Membrane and desalination technology. In: Handbook of environmental engineering, vol 13. Humana Press, New York

  9. 9.

    Cipollina A, Micale G, Rizzuti L (2009) Seawater desalination: conventional and renewable energy processes. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    AlMarzooqi FA, Al Ghaferi AA, Saadat I et al (2014) Application of capacitive deionisation in water desalination: a review. Desalination 342:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bergen A, Djilali N, Fyles TM et al (2003) An experimental assessment of centrifugal membrane separation using spiral wound RO membrane elements. Desalination 154:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ghaffour N, Missimer TM, Amy GL (2013) Technical review and evaluation of the economics of water desalination: current and future challenges for better water supply sustainability. Desalination 309:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Semiat R (2008) Critical review energy issues in desalination processes. Environ Sci Technol 42:8193–8201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Borsani R, Rebagliati S (2005) Fundamentals and costing of MSF desalination plants and comparison with other technologies. Desalination 182:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Li C, Goswami Y, Stefanakos E (2013) Solar assisted sea water desalination: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 19:136–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Szacsvay T, Hofer-Noser P, Posnansky M (1999) Technical and economic aspects of small-scale solar-pond-powered seawater desalination systems. Desalination 122:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Agha KR (2009) The thermal characteristics and economic analysis of a solar pond coupled low temperature multi stage desalination plant. Sol Energy 83:501–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Al Hawaj O, Darwish MA (1994) A solar pond assisted multi-effect desalting system. Desalination 99:119–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Garmana MA, Muntasserb MA (2008) Sizing and thermal study of salinity gradient solar ponds connecting with the MED desalination unit. Desalination 222:689–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tahri K (2001) The prospects of fresh water supply for Tan Tan City from non-conventional water resources. Desalination 135:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    El-Nashar AM (1993) An optimal design of a solar desalination plant. Desalination 93:597–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    El-Nashar AM (2000) Validating the performance simulation program “SOLDES” using data from an operating solar desalination plant. Desalination 130:235–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Goosen MFA, Sablani SS, Paton C et al (2003) Solar energy desalination for arid coastal regions: development of a humidification-dehumidification seawater greenhouse. Sol Energy 75:413–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Mahmoudi H, Abdul-Wahab SA, Goosen MF et al (2008) Weather data and analysis of hybrid photovoltaic–wind power generation systems adapted to a seawater greenhouse desalination unit designed for arid coastal countries. Desalination 222:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gude VG, Nirmalakhandan N (2009) Desalination at low temperatures and low pressures. Desalination 244:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kneass SL (1894) Practice and theory of the injector. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Perry RH (2007) Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook. McGraw Hill, New York

  28. 28.

    Power RB (1994) Steam jet ejectors for the process industries. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Khaghani A, Date A, Akbarzadeh A (2013) Sustainable removal of non-condensable gases from geothermal waters. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 21:204–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Reed RJR, Forrest IS (1986) Performance of a steam eductor in a pilot brewery. J Inst Brew 92:370–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Antonio YM, Périlhon C, Descombes G et al (2012) Thermodynamic modelling of an ejector with compressible flow by a one-dimensional approach. Entropy 14:599–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Rogdakis ED, Alexis GK (2000) Design and parametric investigation of an ejector in an air-conditioning system. Appl Therm Eng 20:213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    El-Nashar AM (1984) Solar desalination using the vacuum freezing ejector absorption (VFEA) process. Desalination 49:293–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Chen JZ, Li YF, Li GH (2011) A new method for desalination of seawater with steam-ejector refrigeration plant. Appl Mech Mater 94–96:273–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Li C (2012) Innovative desalination systems using low-grade heat. Ph.D. Dissertation University of South Florida

  36. 36.

    Manninen M, Taivassalo V, Kallio S (1996) On the mixture model for multiphase flow. VTT Publications 288, Technical Research Centre of Finland

  37. 37.

    Schiller L, Naumann Z (1935) A drag coefficient correlation. VDI Zeitung 77:318–320

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hanjalic K, Kenjeres S (2008) Some developments in turbulence modeling for wind and environmental engineering. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96:1537–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Suksangpanomrung A, Djilali N, Moinat P (2000) Large eddy simulation of separated flow over a bluff plate. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 21:655–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lee WH (1979) A pressure iteration scheme for two-phase modeling. Technical Paper No. LA-UR-79-975, Los Alamos, NM

  41. 41.

    Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache P et al (2008) Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluids Eng 130:078001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Funding and technical support for this work was provided in part by the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under Grant No. (1-135-36-HiCi). The authors would also like to thank Dr. Amir Sharafian for his contributions to this study.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Bahrami.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmadi, M., Thimmaiah, P., Bahrami, M. et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of a solar eductor-assisted low-pressure water desalination system. Sci. Bull. 61, 959–973 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-016-1092-0

Download citation


  • Desalination
  • Solar energy
  • Evaporation
  • Humidification
  • Dehumidification
  • Regenerative heating