Skip to main content
Log in

Vertical structure of longitudinal differences in electron densities at mid-latitudes

中纬电离层电子密度经度结构随高度的变化规律

  • Article
  • Earth Sciences
  • Published:
Science Bulletin

Abstract

By using Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate satellite observations, and Global Ionosphere and Thermosphere Model simulations, the altitudinal dependences of the longitudinal differences in electron densities Ne were studied at mid-latitudes for the first time. Distinct altitudinal dependences were revealed: (1) In the northern (southern) hemisphere, there were wave-1 variations mainly in the daytime in the altitudes below 180 km, but wave-2 (wave-1) variations over a whole day above 220 km; (2) a transition (or separation) layer occurred mainly in the daytime within 180 and 220 km, showing reversed longitudinal variation from that at lower altitudes. Solar illumination was one of the plausible mechanisms for the zonal difference of Ne at lower altitudes. At higher altitudes, both neutral winds and solar illumination played important roles. The neutral winds effects accounted for the longitudinal differences in Ne in the European–Asian sector. Neutral composition changes and neutral wind effects both contributed to the formation of the transition layer.

摘要

本文利用COSMIC(Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate)卫星观测数据以及全球电离层磁层模型(GITM)模拟首次对中纬度电子密度Ne经度差异随高度变化的现象及产生机制进行了研究,结果如下:(1)北(南)半球,在180 km高度以下,白天电子密度主要为单波结构变化,但在220 km以上,几乎全天都呈现双波(单波)结构变化;(2)这种波形过渡(或者说分离)主要发生在白天的180-220 km高度区域,在这一区域甚至显示出与低空相反的经度变化。太阳光照是导致低空电子密度经度差异的可能机制。而在高空区域,太阳光照和中性风均能对电子密度产生重要影响,在亚欧地区,中性风效应是产生电子密度经度差异的主要原因。中性成分的变化和中性风效应均是形成过渡层(分离层)的重要因素。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang S, Foster JC, Coster AJ et al (2011) East-West Coast differences in total electron content over the continental US. Geophys Res Lett 38:L19101

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang S, Foster JC, Holt JM et al (2012) Magnetic declination and zonal wind effects on longitudinal differences of ionospheric electron density at midlatitudes. J Geophys Res 117:A08329

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang S, Chen Z, Coster AJ et al (2013) Ionospheric symmetry caused by geomagnetic declination over North America. Geophys Res Lett 40:5350–5354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao B, Min W, Wang Y et al (2013) East–west differences in F-region electron density at midlatitude: evidence from the far east region. J Geophys Res 118:542–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu JS, Li XJ, Liu YW et al (2014) TEC differences for the mid-latitude ionosphere in both sides of the longitudes with zero declination. Adv Space Res 54:883–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Luan X, Dou X (2013) Seasonal dependence of the longitudinal variations of nighttime ionospheric electron density and equivalent winds at southern midlatitudes. Ann Geophys 31:1699–1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang H, Ridley AJ, Zhu J (2015) Theoretical study of zonal differences of electron density at midlatitudes with GITM simulation. J Geophys Res 120:2951–2966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brahmanandam PS, Chu YH, Wu KH et al (2011) Vertical and longitudinal electron density structures of equatorial E- and F-regions. Ann Geophys 29:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiong C, Lühr H (2014) The Mid-latitude Summer Night Anomaly as observed by CHAMP and GRACE: interpreted as tidal features. J Geophys Res 119:4905–4915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu H, Thampi SV, Yamamoto M (2010) Phase reversal of the diurnal cycle in the midlatitude ionosphere. J Geophys Res 115:A01305

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chang LC, Liu H, Miyoshi Y et al (2015) Structure and origins of the Weddell Sea Anomaly from tidal and planetary wave signatures in FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC observations and GAIA GCM simulations. J Geophys Res 120:1325–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. He M, Liu L, Wan W et al (2009) A study of the Weddell Sea anomaly observed by FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC. J Geophys Res 114:A12309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brahmanandam PS, Chu YH, Uma G et al (2011) A global comparative study on the ionospheric measurements between COSMIC radio occultation technique and IRI model. J Geophys Res 116:A02310

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang H, Liu DW (2015) Interpretation of longitudinal differences of electron density at mid-latitudes: CHAMP observation and GITM simulation. Chin Sci Bull 60:1–12 (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lei J, Syndergaard S, Burns AG et al (2007) Comparison of COSMIC ionospheric measurements with ground-based observations and model predictions: preliminary results. J Geophys Res 112:A07308

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schreiner W, Rocken C, Sokolovskiy S et al (2007) Estimates of the precision of GPS radio occultations from the COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 mission. Geophys Res Lett 34:L04808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ridley AJ, Deng Y, Tóth G (2006) The global ionosphere–thermosphere model. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 68:839–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weimer DR (2005) Improved ionospheric electrodynamic models and application to calculating Joule heating rates. J Geophys Res 110:A05306

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fuller-Rowell TJ, Evans DS (1987) Height-integrated Pedersen and Hall conductivity patterns inferred from the TIROS-NOAA satellite data. J Geophys Res 92(A7):7606–7618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hedin AE (1991) Extension of the MSIS thermosphere model into the middle and lower atmosphere. J Geophys Res 96(A2):1159–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bilitza D (2001) International reference ionosphere 2000. Radio Sci 36(2):261–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maus S, Macmillan S, Chernova T et al (2010) The 10th-generation international geomagnetic reference field. EOS Trans AGU 86(16):159–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yue D, Fuller-Rowell TJ, Akmaev RA et al (2001) Impact of the altitudinal Joule heating distribution on the thermosphere. J Geophys Res 116:A05313

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yiğit Erdal, Ridley Aaron J (2001) Effects of high-latitude thermosphere heating at various scale sizes simulated by a nonhydrostatic global thermosphere–ionosphere model. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 73:592–600

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pawlowski DJ, Ridley AJ (2009) Modeling the ionospheric response to the 28 October 2003 solar flare due to coupling with the thermosphere. Radio Sci 44:RS0A23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu J, Ridley AJ (2014) The effect of background conditions on the ionospheric response to solar flares. J Geophys Res 119:5060–5075

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Taiwan’s National Space Organization and University Corporation for Atmospheric Research in the USA for provision of COSMIC data via the CDAAC database. The solar wind and IMF data are from NASA/GSFC’s Space Physics Data Facility’s OMNI Web service. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) provides the hemispheric power data. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41222030, 41521063, 41431073).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Wang.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. S1

Geolongitudinal and magnetic local time variations of differences in the electron densities (∆Ne) simulated by GITM at September Equinox during solar minimum years at altitudes of 160 km, 200 km, and 300 km in the northern (a, b, c) and southern (d, e, f) hemispheres. Densities are given in 1010m−3. Supplementary material 1 (EPS 27 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (EPS 29 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (EPS 31 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (EPS 26 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (EPS 23 kb)

Supplementary material 6 (EPS 23 kb)

Fig. S2

Geographic longitudinal versus magnetic local time distribution of the electron density residuals (ΔNe) at 100 km altitude when using an ideal dipole field with zero tilt angle. a is in the northern hemisphere and b is in the southern hemisphere. Supplementary material 7 (EPS 34 kb)

Supplementary material 8 (EPS 35 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Liu, D. & Zhang, J. Vertical structure of longitudinal differences in electron densities at mid-latitudes. Sci. Bull. 61, 252–262 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-015-0993-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-015-0993-7

Keywords

Navigation