Skip to main content
Log in

Sparse current source reconstruction in MCG

  • Article
  • Life & Medical Sciences
  • Published:
Science Bulletin

Abstract

Cardiac current source reconstruction is investigated by a fast greedy sparse (FGS) method applied to simulated and real magnetocardiography (MCG) data measured using 61-channel superconducting quantum interference device. The approach reduces the size of the lead field matrix based on a priori knowledge of dipolar magnetic field map. Consequently, the computational demands and the accuracy of sparse source reconstruction are improved simultaneously. The simulation results demonstrate that the FGS method is capable of reconstructing sparse equivalent current sources using the magnetic field data generated by a single current source with varying orientation or multiple current sources generated randomly. In addition, we analyze the cardiac current source reconstructed with real MCG data at typical instants and discuss the electrical excitation conduction during the QRS complex based on moving sparse source imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaiboriboon K, Lüders HO, Hamaneh M et al (2012) EEG source imaging in epilepsy—practicalities and pitfalls. Nat Rev Neurol 8:498–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Peña J, Marroquin J (2011) Region-based current-source reconstruction for the inverse EEG problem. IEEE T Bio-Med Eng 58:1044–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hyde DE, Duffy FH, Warfield SK (2014) Voxel-based dipole orientation constraints for distributed current estimation. IEEE Bio-Med Eng 61:2028–2040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lamus C, Hämäläinen MS, Temereanca S et al (2012) A spatiotemporal dynamic distributed solution to the MEG inverse problem. NeuroImage 63:894–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen D, Hosaka H (1976) Part II Magnetic field produced by a current dipole. J Electrocardiol 9:409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hosaka H, Cohen D (1976) Part IV Visual determination of generators of the magnetocardiogram. J Electrocardiol 9:426–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Melis M, Tanaka K, Uchikawa Y (2010) Magnetocardiography signal reconstruction with reduced source space based on current source variance. IEEE Trans Magn 46:1203–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bing L, Wang WY, Jiang SQ et al (2013) MCG source reconstruction based on greedy sparse method. Acta Phys Sin-Ch Ed 62:550–558 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van Leeuwen P, Hailer B, Beck A et al (2011) Changes in dipolar structure of cardiac magnetic field maps after ST elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Noninvas Electrocardiol 16:379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baillet S, Mosher JC, Leahy RM (2001) Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 18:14–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blumensath T, Davis ME (2008) Gradient pursuits. IEEE Trans Signal Proces 56:2370–2382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Donoho DL, Tsaig Y, Drori I et al (2012) Sparse solution of underdetermined systems of linear equations by stagewise orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans Inform Theory 58:1094–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Needell D, Vershynin R (2009) Uniform uncertainty principle and signal recovery via regularized orthogonal matching pursuit. Found Comput Math 9:317–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Simelius K, Stenroos M, Reinhardt L et al (2003) Spatiotemporal characterization of paced cardiac activation with body surface potential mapping and self-organizing maps. Physiol Meas 24:805–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stroink G, Lant J, Elliott P et al (1992) Discrimination between myocardial infarct and ventricular tachycardia patients using magnetocardiographic trajectory plots and iso-integral maps. J Electrocardiol 25:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (60771030), the National High-Technology Research and Development Program of China (2008AA02Z308), the Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation (08JC1421800), Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project (B004), the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Function Materials for Information (Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiqin Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, M., Jiang, S., Bing, L. et al. Sparse current source reconstruction in MCG. Sci. Bull. 60, 1235–1240 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-015-0845-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-015-0845-5

Keywords

Navigation