Skip to main content
Log in

Distributed implementation of the genetic double-branch structure in Escherichia coli

  • Article
  • Computer Science & Technology
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

Because of the simplicity of cells, the key to building biological computing systems may lie in constructing distributed systems based on cell–cell communication. Guided by a mathematical model, in this study we designed, simulated, and constructed a genetic double-branch structure in the bacterium Escherichia coli. This genetic double-branch structure is composed of a control cell and two reporter cells. The control cell can activate different reporter cells according to the input. Two quorum-sensing signal molecules, 3OC12-HSL and C4-HSL, form the wires between the control cell and the reporter cells. This study is a step toward scalable biological computation, and it may have many potential applications in biocomputing, biosensing, and biotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nurse P (2008) Life, logic and information. Nature 454:424–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benenson Y (2012) Biomolecular computing systems: principles, progress and potential. Nat Rev Genet 13:455–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sipper M (1999) The emergence of cellular computing. Computer 32:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Purnick PEM, Weiss R (2009) The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:410–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Macia J, Posas F, Solé RV (2012) Distributed computation: the new wave of synthetic biology devices. Trends Biotechnol 30:342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nealson KH, Platt T, Hastings JW (1970) Cellular control of synthesis and activity of bacterial luminescent system. J Bacteriol 104:313–322

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miller MB, Bassler BL (2001) Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 55:165–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Camilli A, Bassler BL (2006) Bacterial small-molecule signaling pathways. Science 311:1113–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Waters CM, Bassler BL (2005) Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21:319–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. González JE, Marketon MM (2003) Quorum sensing in nitrogen-fixing rhizobia. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:574–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. González JE, Keshavan ND (2006) Messing with bacterial quorum sensing. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70:859–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. You LC, Cox RS, Weiss R et al (2004) Programmed population control by cell–cell communication and regulated killing. Nature 428:868–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Basu S, Gerchman Y, Collins CH et al (2005) A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation. Nature 434:1130–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tamsir A, Tabor JJ, Voigt CA (2011) Robust multicellular computing using genetically encoded nor gates and chemical ‘wires’. Nature 469:212–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gardner TS, Cantor CR, Collins JJ (2000) Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia Coli. Nature 403:339–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kramer BP, Viretta AU, Daoud-El-Baba M et al (2004) An engineered epigenetic transgene switch in mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol 22:867–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tan C, Marguet P, You LC (2009) Emergent bistability by a growth-modulating positive feedback circuit. Nat Chem Biol 5:842–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ham TS, Lee SK, Keasling JD et al (2008) Design and construction of a double inversion recombination switch for heritable sequential genetic memory. PLoS One 3:e2815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ham TS, Lee SK, Keasling JD et al (2006) A tightly regulated inducible expression system utilizing the fim inversion recombination switch. Biotechnol Bioeng 94:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Deans TL, Cantor CR, Collins JJ (2007) A tunable genetic switch based on RNAi and repressor proteins for regulating gene expression in mammalian cells. Cell 130:363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Halter M, Tona A, Bhadriraju K et al (2007) Automated live cell imaging of green fluorescent protein degradation in individual fibroblasts. Cytometry A 71A:827–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stricker J, Cookson S, Bennett MR et al (2008) A fast, robust and tunable synthetic gene oscillator. Nature 456:516–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Siuti P, Yazbek J, Lu TK (2013) Synthetic circuits integrating logic and memory in living cells. Nat Biotechnol 31:448–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sleight SC, Bartley BA, Lieviant JA et al (2010) In-Fusion BioBrick assembly and re-engineering. Nucleic Acids Res 38:2624–2636

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB329601 and 2013CB329602), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61127005, 60974112, 30970960, 60910002, 60971085, and 61100055).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mei Chen.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, M., Zhang, L. & Xu, J. Distributed implementation of the genetic double-branch structure in Escherichia coli . Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 4625–4630 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0516-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0516-y

Keywords

Navigation