Abstract
Canopy resistance estimation model based on the scaling-up leaf stomatal resistance is the focus of evapotrantion research, as there is a need to select the proper scaling-up model for winter wheat in typical areas of North China. Two years of field experimental data are used for the Leuning-Ball and Jarvis stomatal model calibration and validation, canopy resistance estimation models are established based on Leuning-Ball and Jarvis stomatal models, their application effects are compared and verified. Results show that daily variation of stomatal resistance of winter wheat is higher than that of canopy resistance, and there exists scale differences between leaf and canopy scale; Leuning-Ball stomatal model can be better explicated by the response of stomatal conductance towards environmental factors; Leuning-Ball canopy resistance estimation models turn out to be an effective canopy resistance simulation, and thus can be applied to research on the scaling-up of vapor transmission resistance of winter wheat in typical areas of North China.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Rana G, Katerji N, Mastrorilli M, et al. Validation of a model of actual evapotranspiration for water stressed soybeans. Agr Forest Meteorol, 1997, 86: 215–224
Shuttleworth W J, Wallace J S. Evaporation from sparse crops-An energy combination theory. Q J Royal Meteorol Soc, 1985, 111: 839–855
Brenner A J, Incoll L D. The effect of clumping and stomatal response on evaporation from sparsely vegetated shrublands. Agr Forest Meteorol, 1997, 84: 187–205
Shuttleworth W J. Towards one-step estimation of crop water requirements. T Asabe, 2006, 49: 925–935
Irmak S, Mutiibwa D, Irmak A, et al. On the scaling-up leaf stomatal resistance to canopy resistance using photosynthetic photon flux density. Agr Forest Meteorol, 2008, 148: 1034–1044
Kato T, Kimura R, Kamichika M. Estimation of evapotranspiration, transpiration ratio and water-use efficiency from a sparse canopy using a compartment model. Agr Water Manage, 2004, 65: 173–191
Rana G, Katerji N. Measurement and estimation of actual evapotranspiration in the field under mediterranean climate: A review. Euro J Agron, 2000, 13: 125–153
Anadranistakis M, Liakatas A, Kerkides P, et al. Crop water requirements model tested for crops grown in Greece. Agr Water Manage, 2000, 45: 297–316
Furon A, Warland J S, Wagner-Riddle C. Analysis of scaling-up resistances from leaf to canopy using numerical simulations. Agron J, 2007, 99: 1483–1491
Avissar R, Pielke R A. The impact of plant stomatal control on mesoscale atmospheric circulations. Agr Forest Meteorol, 1991, 54: 353–372
Yu G R, Nakayama K, Matsuoka N, et al. A combination model for estimating stomatal conductance of maize (Zea mays L.) leaves over a long term. Agr Forest Meteorol, 1998, 92: 9–28
Beven K. A sensitivity analysis of the penman-monteith actual evapotranspiration estimates. J Hydrol, 1979, 44: 169–190
Black T A. Estimation of Areal Evapotranspiration. Budapest: IAHS Press, 1989
Oltchev A, Ibrom A, Constantin J, et al. Stomatal and surface conductance of a spruce forest: Model simulation and field measurements. Phys Chem Earth, 1998, 23: 453–458
Raupach M R. Vegetation-atmosphere interaction and surface conductance at leaf, canopy and regional scales. Agr Forest Meteorol, 1995, 73: 151–179
Shen S H, Sun Z B, Chen J M, et al. Modeling of air CO2 concentration and flux in/above a boreal black spruce stand (in Chinese). Acta Meteorol Sin, 2005, 63: 6–17
Whitehead D, Okali D, Fasehun F E. Stomatal response to environmental variables in two tropical forest species during the dry season in Nigeria. J Appl Ecol, 1981, 18: 571–587
Zhang B Z, Kang S, Li F, et al. Comparison of three evapotranspiration models to bowen ratio-energy balance method for a vineyard in an arid desert region of northwest China. Agr Forest Meteorol, 2008, 148: 1629–1640
Zhou M C, Ishidaira H, Takeuchi K. Estimation of potential evapotranspiration over the yellow river basin: Reference crop evaporation or shuttleworth-wallace? Hydrol Process, 2007, 21: 1860–1874
Leuning R. A Critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosyn-thesis model for C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ, 1995, 18: 339–355
Yu Q, Wang T D. Photosynthesis effect—evaporation effect—coupling model of stomatal conductance and physical response of C3 plant leaf towards environmental factors (in Chinese). Bot J, 1998, 40: 740–754
Sellers P J, Randall D A, Collatz G J, et al. A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. Part I: Model formulation. J Climate, 1996, 9: 676–705
Webb E K, Pearman G I, Leuning R. Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapor transfer. Q J Royal Meteorol Soc, 1980, 106: 85–100
Liu G S. Study on measurement and calculation methods of crop evapotranspiration quantify (in Chinese). Dissertation of Masteral Degree. Baoding: Heibei Agricultural University, 2008
Guo J X, Mei X R, Lu Z G, et al. Eddy-covariance related techniques used to measure field evapotranspiration (in Chinese). China Agri Sci, 2004, 37: 1172–1176
Yu G R, Zhuang J, Yu Z L. An attempt to establish a synthetic model of photosynthesis-transpiration based on stomatal behavior for maize and soybean plants grown in field. J Plant Physiol, 2001, 158: 861–874
Yu G R, Nakayama K, Lu H Q. Modeling stomatal conductance in maize leaves with environmental variables. J Agr Meteorol, 1996, 52: 321–330
Zhang B Z, Liu Y, Xu D, et al. Canopy estimation models based on scaling-up of leaf stomatal conductance of summer maize (in Chinese). Agr Eng J, 2011, 27: 80–86
Ye Z P. A new model for relationship between irradiance and the rate of photosynthesis in oryza sativa. Photosynth, 2007, 45: 637–640
Meidner H, Mansfield T A. Physiology of Stomata. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill, 1968
Warland J S, Furon A C, Wagner-Riddle C. Analysis of scaling-up resistances from leaf to canopy using numerical simulations. Agron J, 2007, 99: 1483–1491
Kaufmann M R. Leaf conductance as a function of photosynthetic photon flux density and absolute humidity difference from leaf to air. Plant Physiol, 1982, 69: 1018–1022
Yu G R, Sun X M. Continental Ecosystem Flux Observation Principle and Method (in Chinese). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006
Mccuen R H, Knight Z, Cutter A G. Evaluation of the nash-sutcliffe efficiency index. J Hydrol Eng, 2006, 11: 597–602
Xu H F, Liu X T, Sha Z, et al. Study on the correlation between proline, chlorophyll and stoma block under shadings (in Chinese). Agr Sys Sci Compr Res, 2004, 20: 232–234
Xu D. A survey of scaling transformation in irrigation hydrological studies (in Chinese). Irrig J, 2006, 37: 141–149
Yu G R, Nakayama K, Matsuoka N, et al. A combination model for estimating stomatal conductance of maize (Zea mays L.) leaves over a long term. Agr Forest Meteorol, 1998, 92: 9–28
Egea G, Verhoef A, Vidale P L. Towards an improved and more flexible representation of water stress in coupled photosynthesisstomatal conductance Models. Agr Forest Meteorol, 2011, 151: 1370–1384
Zhang B Z, Liu Y, Xu D, et al. Evapotranspiraton estimation based on scaling up from leaf Stomatal conductance to canopy conductance. Agr Forest Meteorol, 2011, 151: 1086–1095
Rochette P, Pattey E, Desjardins R L, et al. Estimation of maize (Zea mays L.) canopy conductance by scaling up leaf stomatal conductance. Agr Forest Meteorol, 1991, 54: 241–261
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, Z., Liu, Y., Xu, D. et al. Application and comparison of winter wheat canopy resistance estimation models based on the scaling-up of leaf stomatal conductance. Chin. Sci. Bull. 58, 2909–2916 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5858-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5858-3