Abstract
When people move around in their environment, spatial updating, which is an automatic cognitive process, is essential to ensuring people can keep track of their relations between them and the surrounding objects, and to “recalculating” the relative position and orientation of those objects with regard to the current position of the persons. Despite the facilitating effect of spatial updating to people’s mental representation in most circumstances as demonstrated in most of the existing literature, the effect sometimes can be adversarial. For instance, some research suggested that even though people were asked to ignore their locomotion, it is difficult to suppress updating of the spatial representation during movement. The current two studies were conducted to systematically investigate the dual effects of spatial updating in both real and virtual environments. We used a typical spatial updating paradigm to explore the effects of scene familiarity (familiar vs. novel) and person’s locomotion (stationary vs. moving) on change detection accuracy (target object moved or not). The results indicated a facilitating effect of spatial updating in the novel scene condition, but an adversarial effect in the familiar scene condition—the dual effects, in both real and virtual environments.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Sancaktar İ, Demirkan H. Spatial updating of objects after rotational and translational body movements in virtual environments. Comput Human Behav, 2008, 24: 2682–2696
Banta L P, Lecci S, Prętre V, et al. As the world turns: Short-term human spatial memory in egocentric and allocentric coordinates. Behav Brain Res, 2011, 219: 132–141
Wang R F, Brockmole J R. Simultaneous spatial updating in nested environments. Psychon Bull Rev, 2003, 10: 981–986
Wang R F, Spelke E S. Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition, 2000, 77: 215–250
Wang R F, Simons D J. Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 1999, 70: 191–210
Simons D J. In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychol Sci, 1996, 7: 301–305
Wang R F. Spatial representations and spatial updating. Psychol Learning Motiv, 2003, 42: 109–156
Farrell M J, Robertson I H. Mental rotation and automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 1998, 24: 227–233
Farrell M J, Thomson J A. Automatic spatial updating during locomotion without vision. Q J Exp Psychol A, 1998, 51: 637–654
Rieser J J. Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 1989, 15: 1157–1165
Meilinger T, Vosgerau G. Putting egocentric and allocentric into perspective. In: Höolscher C, Shipley T F, Belardinelli M O, et al., eds. Spatial Cognition VII: Lect Notes in Computer Science, Vol 6222. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2010. 207–221
Wan X I, Wang R F, Crowell J A. Spatial updating in superimposed real and virtual environments. Atten Percept Psychophys, 2009, 71: 42–51
Klatzky R L, Loomis J M, Beall A C, et al. Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychol Sci, 1998, 9: 293–298
Riecke B E, Cunningham D W, Bülthoff H H. Spatial updating in virtual reality: The sufficiency of visual information. Psychol Res, 2007, 71: 298–313
May M, Klatzky R L. Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 2000, 26: 169–186
Wraga M, Creem-Regehr S H, Proffitt D R. Spatial updating of virtual displays. Mem Cognit, 2004, 32: 399–415
Simons D J, Wang R F. Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychol Sci, 1998, 9: 315–320
Wang R F, Simons D J. Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 1999, 70: 191–210
Wang R F, Brockmole J R. Simultaneous spatial updating in nested environments. Psychon Bull Rev, 2003, 10: 981–986
Mou W, Mcnamara T P. Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 2002, 28: 162–170
Mou W, Li X, Mcnamara T P. Body-and environmental-stabilized processing of spatial knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 2008, 34: 415–421
Mou W, Mcnamara T P, Rump B, et al. Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 2006, 32: 1274–1290
Burgess N, Spiers H J, Paleologou E. Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: Dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory. Cognition, 2004, 94: 149–166
Blascovich J, Loomis J, Beall A C, et al. Target article: Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychol Inq, 2002, 13: 103–124
Fox J, Arena D, Bailenson J N. Virtual reality: A survival guide for the social scientist. J Med Psychol Theor Methods Applica, 2009, 21: 95–113
Loomis J M, Blascovich J J, Beall A C. Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behav Res Methods, 1999, 31: 557–564
Peng K P, Liu Y, Cao C M, et al. Virtual social psychology: Exploration and implication (in Chinese). Adv Psychol Sci, 2011, 19: 933–943
Lehmann A, Vidal M, Bülthoff H H. A high-end virtual reality setup for the study of mental rotations. Presence, 2008, 17: 365–375
Mou W, Mcnamara T P, Valiquette C M, et al. Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 2004, 30: 142–157
Zhao M, Zhou G, Mou W, et al. Spatial updating during locomotion does not eliminate viewpoint-dependent visual object processing. Vis Cogn, 2007, 15: 402–419
Mou W, Xiao C, Mcnamara T P. Reference directions and reference objects in spatial memory of a briefly viewed layout. Cognition, 2008, 108: 136–154
Lloyd J, Persaud N V, Powell T E. Equivalence of real-world and virtual-reality route learning: A pilot study. Cyberpsychol Behav, 2009, 12: 423–427
Hu B, Ma L, Zhang W, et al. Predicting real-world ergonomic measurements by simulation in a virtual environment. Int J Ind Ergon, 2011, 41: 64–71
Parsons T D, Rizzo A A. Initial validation of a virtual environment for assessment of memory functioning: Virtual reality cognitive performance assessment test. Cyberpsychol Behav, 2008, 11: 17–25
Bayraktar F, Amca H. Interrelations between virtual-world and real-world activities: Comparison of genders, age groups, and pathological and nonpathological Internet users. Cyberpsychol Behav, 2012, 15: 263–269
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, S., Zheng, X.S., Liu, X. et al. Dual effects of spatial updating in both real and virtual environments. Chin. Sci. Bull. 58, 898–906 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5676-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5676-7