Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Chinese Science Bulletin
  3. Article

Dual effects of spatial updating in both real and virtual environments

  • Article
  • Psychological & Cognitive Sciences
  • Open access
  • Published: 08 March 2013
  • Volume 58, pages 898–906, (2013)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Chinese Science Bulletin
Dual effects of spatial updating in both real and virtual environments
Download PDF
  • ShuQing Liu1,
  • XianJun Sam Zheng1,
  • XianYun Liu2 &
  • …
  • KaiPing Peng1,3 
  • 1005 Accesses

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

When people move around in their environment, spatial updating, which is an automatic cognitive process, is essential to ensuring people can keep track of their relations between them and the surrounding objects, and to “recalculating” the relative position and orientation of those objects with regard to the current position of the persons. Despite the facilitating effect of spatial updating to people’s mental representation in most circumstances as demonstrated in most of the existing literature, the effect sometimes can be adversarial. For instance, some research suggested that even though people were asked to ignore their locomotion, it is difficult to suppress updating of the spatial representation during movement. The current two studies were conducted to systematically investigate the dual effects of spatial updating in both real and virtual environments. We used a typical spatial updating paradigm to explore the effects of scene familiarity (familiar vs. novel) and person’s locomotion (stationary vs. moving) on change detection accuracy (target object moved or not). The results indicated a facilitating effect of spatial updating in the novel scene condition, but an adversarial effect in the familiar scene condition—the dual effects, in both real and virtual environments.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Walking-related locomotion is facilitated by the perception of distant targets in the extrapersonal space

Article Open access 08 July 2019

Is the construction of spatial models multimodal? New evidences towards sensory-motor information involvement from temporary blindness study

Article 09 October 2020

Spatial attention is necessary for object-based attention: Evidence from temporal-order judgments

Article 27 December 2016

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Media Reception and Media Effects
  • Motion Perception
  • Placebo Effect
  • Spatial Demography
  • Spatial Economics
  • Virtual and Augmented Reality
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. Sancaktar İ, Demirkan H. Spatial updating of objects after rotational and translational body movements in virtual environments. Comput Human Behav, 2008, 24: 2682–2696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banta L P, Lecci S, Prętre V, et al. As the world turns: Short-term human spatial memory in egocentric and allocentric coordinates. Behav Brain Res, 2011, 219: 132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang R F, Brockmole J R. Simultaneous spatial updating in nested environments. Psychon Bull Rev, 2003, 10: 981–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang R F, Spelke E S. Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition, 2000, 77: 215–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang R F, Simons D J. Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 1999, 70: 191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Simons D J. In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychol Sci, 1996, 7: 301–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang R F. Spatial representations and spatial updating. Psychol Learning Motiv, 2003, 42: 109–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Farrell M J, Robertson I H. Mental rotation and automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 1998, 24: 227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Farrell M J, Thomson J A. Automatic spatial updating during locomotion without vision. Q J Exp Psychol A, 1998, 51: 637–654

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rieser J J. Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 1989, 15: 1157–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meilinger T, Vosgerau G. Putting egocentric and allocentric into perspective. In: Höolscher C, Shipley T F, Belardinelli M O, et al., eds. Spatial Cognition VII: Lect Notes in Computer Science, Vol 6222. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2010. 207–221

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Wan X I, Wang R F, Crowell J A. Spatial updating in superimposed real and virtual environments. Atten Percept Psychophys, 2009, 71: 42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Klatzky R L, Loomis J M, Beall A C, et al. Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychol Sci, 1998, 9: 293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Riecke B E, Cunningham D W, Bülthoff H H. Spatial updating in virtual reality: The sufficiency of visual information. Psychol Res, 2007, 71: 298–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. May M, Klatzky R L. Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 2000, 26: 169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wraga M, Creem-Regehr S H, Proffitt D R. Spatial updating of virtual displays. Mem Cognit, 2004, 32: 399–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Simons D J, Wang R F. Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychol Sci, 1998, 9: 315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang R F, Simons D J. Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 1999, 70: 191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang R F, Brockmole J R. Simultaneous spatial updating in nested environments. Psychon Bull Rev, 2003, 10: 981–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mou W, Mcnamara T P. Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 2002, 28: 162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mou W, Li X, Mcnamara T P. Body-and environmental-stabilized processing of spatial knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 2008, 34: 415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mou W, Mcnamara T P, Rump B, et al. Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 2006, 32: 1274–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Burgess N, Spiers H J, Paleologou E. Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: Dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory. Cognition, 2004, 94: 149–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Blascovich J, Loomis J, Beall A C, et al. Target article: Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychol Inq, 2002, 13: 103–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fox J, Arena D, Bailenson J N. Virtual reality: A survival guide for the social scientist. J Med Psychol Theor Methods Applica, 2009, 21: 95–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Loomis J M, Blascovich J J, Beall A C. Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behav Res Methods, 1999, 31: 557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Peng K P, Liu Y, Cao C M, et al. Virtual social psychology: Exploration and implication (in Chinese). Adv Psychol Sci, 2011, 19: 933–943

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lehmann A, Vidal M, Bülthoff H H. A high-end virtual reality setup for the study of mental rotations. Presence, 2008, 17: 365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mou W, Mcnamara T P, Valiquette C M, et al. Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 2004, 30: 142–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao M, Zhou G, Mou W, et al. Spatial updating during locomotion does not eliminate viewpoint-dependent visual object processing. Vis Cogn, 2007, 15: 402–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mou W, Xiao C, Mcnamara T P. Reference directions and reference objects in spatial memory of a briefly viewed layout. Cognition, 2008, 108: 136–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lloyd J, Persaud N V, Powell T E. Equivalence of real-world and virtual-reality route learning: A pilot study. Cyberpsychol Behav, 2009, 12: 423–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hu B, Ma L, Zhang W, et al. Predicting real-world ergonomic measurements by simulation in a virtual environment. Int J Ind Ergon, 2011, 41: 64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Parsons T D, Rizzo A A. Initial validation of a virtual environment for assessment of memory functioning: Virtual reality cognitive performance assessment test. Cyberpsychol Behav, 2008, 11: 17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bayraktar F, Amca H. Interrelations between virtual-world and real-world activities: Comparison of genders, age groups, and pathological and nonpathological Internet users. Cyberpsychol Behav, 2012, 15: 263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    ShuQing Liu, XianJun Sam Zheng & KaiPing Peng

  2. Academy of Psychology and Behaviour, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, 300074, China

    XianYun Liu

  3. Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA

    KaiPing Peng

Authors
  1. ShuQing Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. XianJun Sam Zheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. XianYun Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. KaiPing Peng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to XianJun Sam Zheng, XianYun Liu or KaiPing Peng.

Additional information

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Rights and permissions

This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, S., Zheng, X.S., Liu, X. et al. Dual effects of spatial updating in both real and virtual environments. Chin. Sci. Bull. 58, 898–906 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5676-7

Download citation

  • Received: 02 June 2012

  • Accepted: 14 December 2012

  • Published: 08 March 2013

  • Issue Date: March 2013

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5676-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • spatial updating
  • spatial representation
  • scene recognition
  • virtual environment
  • virtual reality
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

152.53.39.118

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature