Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Investigation of the ozone formation potential for ethanol using a smog chamber
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open Access
  • Published: 06 August 2012

Investigation of the ozone formation potential for ethanol using a smog chamber

  • Long Jia1,
  • YongFu Xu1 &
  • YuZhen Shi1 

Chinese Science Bulletin volume 57, pages 4472–4481 (2012)Cite this article

  • 1167 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The ozone formation reactivity of ethanol has been studied using chamber experiments and model simulations. The computer simulations are based on the MCM v3.1 mechanism with chamber-dependent auxiliary reactions. Results show that the MCM mechanism can well simulate C2H5OH-NO x chamber experiments in our experimental conditions, especially on ozone formation. C2H5OH-NO x irradiations are less sensitive to relative humidity than alkane species under our experimental conditions. In order to well simulate the experiments under high relative humidity conditions, inclusion of N2O5+H2O=2HNO3 in the MCM mechanism is necessary. Under C2H5OH-limited conditions, the C2H5OH/NO x ratio shows a positive effect on d(O3-NO)/dt and RO2+HO2. High C2H5OH/NO x ratios enhance the production of organoperoxide radical and HO2 radical concentrations, which leads to a much quicker accumulation of ozone. By using ozone isopleths under typical scenarios conditions, the actual ozone formation ability of ethanol is predicted to be 2.3–3.5 part per billion (ppb) in normal cities, 3.5–146 ppb in cities where ethanol gas are widely used, and 0.2–3.2 ppb in remote areas. And maximum ozone formation potential from ethanol is predicted to be 4.0–5.8 ppb in normal cities, 5.8–305 ppb in cities using ethanol gas, and 0.2–3.8 ppb in remote areas.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

References

  1. Carter W P L, Atkinson R. An experimental study of incremental hydrocarbon reactivity. Environ Sci Technol, 1987, 21: 670–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xin J Y, Wang Y S, Tang G Q, et al. Variability and reduction of atmospheric pollutants in Beijing and its surrounding area during the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games. Chin Sci Bull, 2010, 55: 1937–1944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carter W P L. Development of ozone reactivity scales for volatile organic compounds. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 1994, 44: 881–899

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly N A, Chang T Y. An experimental investigation of incremental reactivities of volatile organic compounds. Atmos Environ, 1999, 33: 2101–2110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu S, Hao J M, Lu Z F, et al. Effect of ammonium sulfate aerosol on the photochemical reaction of toluene /NOx/air mixture. Chin J Environ Sci, 2007, 28: 1183–1187

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang K, Du L, Ge M F. Environmental chamber study of the photochemical reaction of ethyl methyl sulfide and NOx. J Environ Sci, 2009, 21: 137–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Monod A, Bonnefoy N, Kaluzny P, et al. Methods for sampling and analysis of tropospheric ethanol in gaseous and aqueous phases. Chemosphere, 2003, 52: 1307–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelly J T, Callahan P J, Pleil J, et al. Method development and field measurements for polar volatile organic compounds in ambient air. Environ Sci Technol, 1993, 27: 1146–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pereira P A D, Santos L M B, Sousa E T, et al. Alcohol- and gasohol-fuels: A comparative chamber study of photochemical ozone formation. J Brazil Chem Soc 2004, 15: 646–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobson M Z. Effects of ethanol (e85) versus gasoline vehicles on cancer and mortality in the United States. Environ Sci Technol, 2007, 41: 4150–4157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Howard C J, Yang W L, Green P G, et al. Direct measurements of the ozone formation potential from dairy cattle emissions using a transportable smog chamber. Atmos Environ, 2008, 42: 5267–5277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu Y F, Jia L, Ge M F, et al. A kinetic study of the reaction of ozone with ethylene in a smog chamber under atmospheric conditions. Chin Sci Bull, 2006, 51: 2839–2843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jia L, Xu Y F, Ge M F, et al. Kinetic study of the gas-phase ozonolysis of propylene. Acta Phys-Chim Sin, 2006, 22: 1260–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Du L, Xu Y F, Ge M F, et al. Smog chamber simulation of atmospheric photochemical reactions of acetylene and NOx (in Chinese). Chin J Environ Sci, 2007, 28: 482–488

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jia L, Xu Y F, Ge M F, et al. Smog chamber studies of ozone formation potentials for isopentane. Chin Sci Bull, 2009, 54: 4624–4632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carter W P L, Atkinson R, Winer A M, et al. Evidence for chamber-dependent radical source: Impact on kinetic computer models for air pollution. Int J Chem Kinet, 1981, 13: 735–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kleffmann J, Becker K H, Wieses P. Heterogeneous NO2 conversion processes on acid surfaces possible atmospheric implications. Atmos Environ, 1998, 32: 2721–2729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aumont B, Chervier F, Laval S. Contribution of HONO sources to the NOx/HOx/O3 chemistry in the polluted boundary layer. Atmos Environ, 2003, 37: 487–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rohrer F, Bohn B, Brauers T, et al. Characterisation of the photolytic HONO-source in the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR. Atmos Chem Phys, 2005, 5: 2189–2201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Carter W P L, Cocker III D R, Fitz D, et al. A new environmental chamber for evaluation of gas-phase chemical mechanisms and secondary aerosol formation. Atmos Environ, 2005, 39: 7768–7788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Meagher J F, Olszyna K J, Simonaitis R. Smog chamber study of H2O2 formation in ethane-NOx and propene-NOx mixtures. Int J Chem Kinet, 1990, 22: 719–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bloss C, Wagner V, Bonzanini A, et al. Evaluation of detailed aromatic mechanisms (MCMv3 and MCMv3.1) against environmental chamber data. Atmos Chem Phys, 2005, 5: 623–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China

    Long Jia, YongFu Xu & YuZhen Shi

Authors
  1. Long Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. YongFu Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. YuZhen Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to YongFu Xu.

Additional information

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Rights and permissions

This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.

About this article

Cite this article

Jia, L., Xu, Y. & Shi, Y. Investigation of the ozone formation potential for ethanol using a smog chamber. Chin. Sci. Bull. 57, 4472–4481 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-5375-9

Download citation

  • Received: 13 April 2012

  • Accepted: 28 May 2012

  • Published: 06 August 2012

  • Issue Date: December 2012

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-5375-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • ethanol
  • ozone
  • photochemical smog
  • MCM
  • smog chamber
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.