Chinese Science Bulletin

, Volume 57, Issue 35, pp 4594–4599 | Cite as

An engraved artifact from Shuidonggou, an Early Late Paleolithic Site in Northwest China

  • Fei Peng
  • Xing Gao
  • HuiMin Wang
  • FuYou Chen
  • DeCheng Liu
  • ShuWen Pei
Open Access
Article Geology

Abstract

Cognition and symbolic thinking are viewed as important features of modern human behavior. Engraved objects are seen as a hallmark of cognition and symbolism, and even as evidence for language. Accumulated evidences including engraved bones, ochre, ostrich eggshells and stone artifacts were unearthed from Africa, Europe, Levant even Siberia Paleolithic sites. But the archaeological evidence for this, including beads, ornaments, burials, performed objects and engraved objects, is rarely discovered in the Pleistocene of East Asia. The present paper reports an engraved stone object unearthed in the Early Late Paleolithic levels about 30 ka BP at the Shuidonggou site (SDG) in northwestern China. It was unearthed in the 1980’s excavation from Lower culture unit of SDG1 but was identified in 2011 when the first author of this article observed the collection from the 1980’s excavations stored in the Institute of Archaeology of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region for further detailed lithic analysis. This lithic artifact is the first engraved non-organic object of the Paleolithic period found in China. In order to clarify the details of the incisions and to document the human intentional modifications, we used a KEYENCE VHX-600 Digital Microscope to measure and observe all the incisions in 3-dimensional perspective. Comparing the natural cracks and analyzing many details of the incisions, we argue that incisions on this stone artifact are the result of intentional behaviors by ancient humans. Also, we exclude the possible other causes including animal-induced damages, post-depositional phenomenon and unintentional by-products. Combining all these features, we suggest that the incisions were made by an intentional behavior and were probably of a non-utilitarian character. Because the nature of most other engraved objects in China is debate, we cannot get a clear scenario of the emergence and progress of modern human behavior in North China. But we infer the possible existence of a counting or recording system, or other symbolic behaviors, which reflect considerably evolved cognitive capacities or modern human behavior in the Early Late Paleolithic of East Asia.

Keywords

modern human behavior engraved artifact cognition and symbolism Shuidonggou Early Late Paleolithic 

References

  1. 1.
    McBrearty S, Brooks A S. The revolution that wasn’t: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. J Hum Evol, 2000, 39: 453–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    d’Errico F. The invisible frontier: A multiple species model for the origin of behavioral modernity. Evol Anthr, 2003, 12: 188–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henshilwood C S, Marean C W. The origin of modern human behavior. Curr Anthropol, 2003, 44: 627–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marshack A. Cognitive aspects of Upper Paleolithic engraving. Curr Anthropol, 1972, 13: 445–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marshack A. Some implications of the Paleolithic symbolic evidence for the origin of language. Curr Anthropol, 1976, 17: 274–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    d’Errico F, Henshilwood C, Lawon G, et al. Archaeological evidence for the emergence of language, symbolism, and music—An alternative multidisciplinary perspective. J Worl Preh, 2003, 17: 1–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Henshilwood C S, d’Errico F, Watts I. Engraved ochres from the Middle Stone Age levels at Blombos Cave, South Africa. J Hum Evol, 2009, 57: 27–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henshilwood C S, d’Errico F, Yates R, et al. Emergence of modern human behavior: Middle Stone Age engravings from South Africa. Science, 2002, 295: 1278–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hovers E, Vandermeersch B, Bar-Yosef O. A Middle Palaeolithic engraved artefact from Qafzeh Cave, Israel. Rock Art Res, 1997, 14: 79–87Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hovers E. Art in the Levantine Epi-Paleolithic: An engraved pebble from a Kebaran site in the Lower Jordan valley. Curr Anthropol, 1990, 31: 317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marshack A. A middle Paleolithic symbolic composition from the Golan Heights: The earliest known depictive image. Curr Anthropol, 1996, 37: 357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mackay A, Welz A. Engraved ochre from a Middle Stone context at Klein Kliphuis in the western Cape of South Africa. J Arc Sci, 2008, 35: 1521–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marshack A, Bandi H G, Christensen J, et al. Upper Paleolithic symbol systems of the Russian Plain: Cognitive and comparative analysis. Curr Anthropol, 1979, 20: 271–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    You Y Z. Preliminary study of a Palaeolithic bone engraving. Kexue Tongbao, 1984, 29: 80–82Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bednarik R G. The Pleistocene art of Asia. J Worl Preh. 1994, 8: 351–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gao X, Huang W B, Xu Z Q, et al. 120–150 ka human tooth and ivory engravings from Xinglongdong Cave, Three Gorges Region, South China. Chin Sci Bull, 2004, 49: 175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Norton C J, Jin J H. The evolution of modern human behavior in East Asia: Current perspectives. Evol Anthr, 2009, 18: 247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gao X, Norton C J. A critique of the Chinese ‘Middle Paleolithic’. Antiquity, 2002, 76: 397–412Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ningxia Provincial Institute of Archaeology. Shuidonggou-1980 Excavation Report (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 2003Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guan Y, Gao X, Wang H M, et al. Spatial analysis of intra-site use at a Late Paleolithic site at Shuidonggou, Northwest China. Chin Sci Bull, 2011, 56: 3457–3463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang H M, Pei S W, Ma X L, et al. A preliminary report on the excavations of Shuidonggou Localities 3, 4, 5 in Ningxia (in Chinese). Acta Anthropol Sin, 2007, 26: 206–221Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boule M, Breuil H, Licent E, et al. Le Paleolithique de la Chine. Paris: Archives de l’institut de Paleontologie Humaine, 1928, 4: 1–138Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jia L P, Gai P, Li Y X. The new material of Shuidonggou Paleolithic site (in Chinese). Vertebrata Palasiatica, 1964, 8: 75–83Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhou K, Hu J. Environment and stratigraphy at the Shuidonggou site (in Chinese). Acta Anthropol Sin, 1988, 7: 263–269Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu D C, Chen F Y, Zhang X L, et al. Preliminary comments on the Paleoenviroment of the Shuidonggou Locality 12 (in Chinese). Acta Anthropol Sin, 2008, 27: 295–303Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gao X, Yuan B, Pei S, et al. Analysis of sedimentary-geomorphologic variation and the living environment of hominids at the Shuidonggou Paleolithic site. Chin Sci Bull, 2008, 53: 2025–2032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gao X, Li J, Madsen D B, et al. New 14C dates for Shuidonggou and related discussions (in Chinese). Acta Anthropol Sin, 2002, 21: 211–218Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu D C, Wang X L, Gao X, et al. Progress in the stratigraphy and geochronology of the Shuidonggou site, Ningxia, North China. Chin Sci Bull, 2009, 54: 3880–3886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li X G, Liu G L, Xu G Y, et al. 14C dating to report(PV)I (in Chinese). In: 14C Geochronology Group of Quaternary Committee, ed. Proceedings of Quaternary Glacier and Quaternary Geology (Series 4). Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1987. 16–38Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen T M, Yuan S X, Gao S J. The study on Uranium-series dating of fossil bones and an absolute age sequence for the main palaeolithic sites of North China (in Chinese). Acta Anthropol Sin, 1984, 3: 259–269Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brantingham P J, Krivoshapkin A I, Li J Z, et al. The initial Upper Paleolithic in Northeast Asia. Curr Anthropo, 2001, 42: 735–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Binford L R. Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. New York: Academic Press, 1981Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shea J J, Klenck J D. An experimental investigation of the effects of trampling on the results of lithic use wear analysis. J Archaeol Sci, 1993, 20: 175–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    d’Errico F, Stringer C B. Evolution, revolution or saltation scenario for the emergence of modern cultures? Phil Trans R Soc B, 2011, 366: 1060–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    d’Errico F. Palaeolithic lunar calendars: A case of wishful thinking. Curr Anthropo, 1989, 30: 117–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pei W C. A preliminary report on the Late Paleolithic cave of Choukoutien. Bull Geol Soc Chin, 1934, 13: 327–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bednarik R G. Paleolithic art found in China. Nature, 1992, 356: 116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Guan Y, Gao X, Li F, et al. Modern human behaviors during the late stage of the MIS3 and the broad spectrum revolution: Evidence from a Shuidonggou Late Paleolithic site. Chin Sci Bull, 2012, 57: 379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fei Peng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xing Gao
    • 1
  • HuiMin Wang
    • 3
  • FuYou Chen
    • 1
  • DeCheng Liu
    • 1
  • ShuWen Pei
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Human Evolution, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and PaleoanthropologyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Institute of Archaeology of Ningxia Hui Autonomous RegionYinchuanChina

Personalised recommendations