Advertisement

Chinese Science Bulletin

, Volume 57, Issue 25, pp 3300–3311 | Cite as

Flashing light in sponges through their siliceous fiber network: A new strategy of “neuronal transmission” in animals

  • XiaoHong WangEmail author
  • XingTao Fan
  • Heinz C. Schröder
  • Werner E. G. MüllerEmail author
Open Access
Article Special Topic Omics in Marine Biotechnology
First Online:

Abstract

Sponges (phylum Porifera) represent a successful animal taxon that evolved prior to the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary (542 million years ago). They have developed an almost complete array of cell- and tissue-based interaction systems necessary for the establishment of a functional, multicellular body. However, a network of neurons, one cell/tissue-communication system is missing in sponges. This fact is puzzling and enigmatic, because these animals possess receptors known to be involved in the nervous system in evolutionary younger animal phyla. As an example, the metabotropic glutamate/GABA-like receptor has been identified and cloned by us. Recently, we have identified a novel light transmission/light responsive system in sponges that is based on their skeletal elements, the siliceous glass fibers, termed spicules. Two classes of sponges, the Hexactinellida and the Demospongiae, possess a siliceous skeleton that is composed of spicules. Studying the large spicules from hexactinellid sponges (>5 cm) revealed that these spicules are effective light-collecting optical fibers. Now we can report that the demosponge, Suberites domuncula, has a biosensor system consisting of the (organic) light producing luciferase and the (inorganic) light transducing silica spicules. The light transmission features of these smaller spicules (200 μm) has been demonstrated and the ability of the sponge tissue to generate light had been proven. Screening for a luciferase gene in S. domuncula was successful. In the next step, we searched for a protein potentially involved in light reception. Such a protein was identified, cloned and recombinantly expressed from S. domuncula. The protein sequence displays two domains characteristic of a cryptochrome, the N-terminal photolyase-related region and the C-terminal FAD-binding domain. The experimental data indicate that sponges may employ a network of luciferase-like proteins, a spicular system and a cryptochrome as the light source, optical waveguide and photosensor, respectively. Finally, we have identified a potential transcription factor involved in the control of the expression of luciferase and cryptochrome, a SOX-related protein. We assume that a flashing light signaling circuit exists, which may control the retinoic acid-induced differentiation of stem cells into pulsating and contracting sponge cells, and into pinacocytes and myocytes. Such a “nervous”-like signal transduction system has not been previously described.

Keywords

sponges Suberites domuncula “nervous”-like signal system light transmission siliceous spicules luciferase cryptochrome 
Download to read the full article text

References

  1. 1.
    Müller W E G, Li J, Schröder H C, et al. The unique skeleton of siliceous sponges (Porifera; Hexactinellida and Demospongiae) that evolved first from the Urmetazoa during the Proterozoic: A review. Biogeosciences, 2007, 4: 219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang X H, Hu S, Gan L, et al. Sponges (Porifera) as living metazoan witnesses from the Neoproterozoic: Biomineralization and the concept of their evolutionary success. Terra Nova, 2010, 22: 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Müller W E G, Wiens M, Adell T, et al. The Bauplan of the Urmetazoa: The basis of the genetic complexity of Metazoa using the siliceous sponges [Porifera] as living fossils. Int Rev Cytol, 2004, 235: 53–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Müller W E G, Wang X H, Cui F Z, et al. Sponge spicules as blueprints for the biofabrication of inorganic-organic composites and biomaterials. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2009, 83: 397–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang X H, Schröder H C, Müller W E G. Giant siliceous spicules from the deep-sea glass sponge Monorhaphis chuni: Morphology, biochemistry and molecular biology. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol, 2009, 273: 69–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morse D E. Silicon biotechnology: Harnessing biological silica production to construct new materials. Trends Biotechnol, 1999, 17: 230–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Müller W E G. Silicon Biomineralization: Biology-Biochemistry-Molecular Biology-Biotechnology. Berlin: Springer Press, 2003Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krasko A, Batel R, Schröder H C, et al. Expression of silicatein and collagen genes in the marine sponge Suberites domuncula is controlled by silicate and myotrophin. Europ J Biochem, 2000, 267: 4878–4887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wiens M, Belikov S I, Kaluzhnaya O V, et al. Axial (apical-basal) expression of pro-apoptotic and pro-survival genes in the Lake Baikal demosponge Lubomirskia baicalensis. DNA Cell Biol, 2006, 25: 152–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Müller W E G, Wendt K, Geppert C, et al. Novel photoreception system in sponges? Unique transmission properties of the stalk spicules from the hexactinellid Hyalonema sieboldi. Biosens Bioelectron, 2006, 21: 1149–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang X H, Li J, Qiao L, et al. Structure and characteristics of giant spicules of the deep sea hexactinellid sponges of the genus Monorhaphis (Hexactinellida: Amphidiscosida: Monorhaphididae). Acta Zool Sin, 2007, 53: 557–569Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harvey E N. Studies on bioluminescence. XIII. Luminescence in the coelenterates. Biol Bull, 1921, 41: 280–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Belas R, Mileham A, Cohn D, et al. Bacterial bioluminescence: Isolation and expression of the luciferase genes from Vibrio harveyi. Science, 1982, 218: 791–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hervant F, Mathieu J, Barre H. Comparative study on the metabolic responses of subterranean and surface-dwelling amphipods to longterm starvation and subsequent refeeding. J Exp Biol, 1999, 202: 3587–3595Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alieva N O, Konzen K A, Field S F, et al. Diversity and evolution of coral fluorescent proteins. PLoS One, 2008, 3: e2680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wiens M, Grebenjuk V A, Schröder H C, et al. Identification and isolation of a retrotransposon from the Lubomirskia baicalensis: Implication in rapid evolution of endemic sponges. Prog Mol Subcell Biol, 2009, 47: 207–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Müller W E G, Belikov S I, Kaluzhnaya O V, et al. Cold stress defense in the freshwater sponge Lubomirskia baicalensis: Role of okadaic acid produced by symbiotic dinoflagellates. FEBS J, 2006, 274: 23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilson T, Hastings J W. Bioluminescence. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 1998, 14: 197–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ridley S O, Dendy A. Report on the Monaxonida collected by H.M.S. ‘Challenger’. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of the H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76. Vol. 20. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1887Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leys S P, Mackie G O, Reiswig H M. The biology of glass sponges. Adv Mar Biol, 2007, 52: 1–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Müller W E G, Wang X H, Burghard Z, et al. Bio-sintering processes in hexactinellid sponges: Fusion of bio-silica in giant basal spicules from Monorhaphis chuni. J Struct Biol, 2009, 168: 548–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Strehler B L, McElroy W D. Purification of firefly luciferin. J Cell Physiol, 1949, 34: 457–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meighen E A. Molecular biology of bacterial bioluminescence. Microbiol Rev, 1991, 55: 123–142Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Greer L F, Szalay A A. Imaging of light emission from the expression of luciferase in living cells and organisms: A review. Luminescence, 2002, 17: 43–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Müller W E G, Kasueske M, Wang X H, et al. Luciferase a light source for the silica-based optical waveguides (spicules) in the demosponge Suberites domuncula. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2009, 66: 537–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Branchini B R, Ablamsky D M, Murtiashaw M H, et al. Thermostable red and green light-producing firefly luciferase mutants for bioluminescent reporter applications. Anal Biochem, 2007, 361: 253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gomi K, Kajiyama N. Oxyluciferin, a luminescence product of firefly luciferase, is enzymatically regenerated into luciferin. J Biol Chem, 2001, 276: 36508–36513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Müller W E G, Wiens M, Batel R, et al. Establishment of a primary cell culture from a sponge: Primmorphs from Suberites domuncula. Marine Ecol Prog Ser, 1999, 178: 205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Müller W E G, Wang X, Schröder H C, et al. A cryptochrome-based photosensory system in the siliceous sponge Suberites domuncula (Demospongiae). FEBS J, 2010, 277: 1182–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wiens M, Wang X, Unger A, et al. Flashing light signaling circuit in sponges: endogenous light generation after tissue ablation in Suberites domuncula. J Cell Biochem, 2010, 111: 1377–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Levy O, Dubinsky Z, Achituv Y. Photobehavior of stony corals: Responses to light spectra and intensity. J Exp Biol, 2003, 206: 4041–4049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Levy O, Appelbaum L, Leggat W, et al. Light-responsive cryptochromes from a simple multicellular animal, the coral Acropora millepora. Science, 2007, 318: 467–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sarma A S, Daum T, Müller W E G. Secondary metabolites from marine sponges: Part I: Origin and chemistry of new metabolites, and synthetic studies; Part II: Biological properties of new metabolites and physiological activities of avarol and related compounds isolated from Dysidea sp. Akademie gemeinnütziger Wissenschaften zu Erfurt. Berlin: Ullstein-Mosby Verlag, 1993. 1–168Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gehring W J, Ikeo K. Pax 6: Mastering eye morphogenesis and eye evolution. Trends Genet, 2009, 15: 371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Koopman P, Schepers G, Brenner S, et al. Origin and diversity of the Sox transcription factor gene family: Genome-wide analysis in Fugu rubripes. Gene, 2004, 328: 177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wegner M. From head to toes: The multiple facets of SOX proteins. Nucleic Acids Res, 1999, 27: 1409–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hagstrom S A, Pauer G J, Reid J, et al. SOX2 mutation causes anophthalmia, hearing loss, and brain anomalies. Am J Med Genet, 2005, 138: 95–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research Center for GeoanalysisChinese Academy of Geological SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.ERC Advanced Grant Research Group at the Institute for Physiological ChemistryUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg UniversityMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations