Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Chinese Science Bulletin
  3. Article

The evidence for the evolution of interplanetary small flux ropes: Boundary layers

  • Article
  • Special Issue Basic Plasma Processes in Solar-Terrestrial Activities
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 February 2012
  • Volume 57, pages 1415–1420, (2012)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Chinese Science Bulletin
The evidence for the evolution of interplanetary small flux ropes: Boundary layers
Download PDF
  • HengQiang Feng1,2,3,
  • JieMin Wang1 &
  • DeJin Wu4 
  • 627 Accesses

  • 10 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

We have examined theWind data in 1996 and identified 21 small interplanetary magnetic flux ropes (SIMFRs), and all the 21 SIMFRs have boundary layer structures. The durations of the boundary layers varied from several minutes to 30 minutes. These boundary layers also have properties of high proton temperature, density, and plasma beta. These boundary layers are formed by magnetic reconnections. In addition, in three events magnetic reconnections were occurring inside the boundary layers. It indicates that the flux rope structures have propagated for some period of time, and their boundaries were still evolving through interaction with the background solar wind. Namely it is very possible that the SIMFRs came from the solar corona.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Small interplanetary magnetic flux rope

Article 27 June 2019

Magnetic Disconnections at the Boundary of a Small Interplanetary Magnetic Flux Rope Associated with a Reconnection Exhaust

Article 06 August 2018

Unraveling the Internal Magnetic Field Structure of the Earth-directed Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections During 1995 – 2015

Article 09 July 2019

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Intermediate filaments
  • Magnetospheric Physics
  • Solar Physics
  • Stellar evolution
  • Stress fibres
  • Heliospheric Physics
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. Moldwin M B, Phillips J L, Gosling J T, et al. Ulysses observation of a noncoronal mass ejection flux rope: Evidence of interplanetary magnetic reconnection. J Geophys Res, 1995, 100: 19903–19910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moldwin M B, Ford S, Lepping R, et al. Small-scale magnetic flux ropes in the solar wind. Geophys Res Lett, 2000, 27: 57–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feng H Q, Wu D J, Chao J K. Size and energy distributions of interplanetary magnetic flux ropes. J Geophys Res, 2007, 112: A02102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burlaga L F. Magnetic clouds and force-free fields with constant alpha. J Geophys Res, 1988, 93: 7217–7224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lepping R P, Burlaga L F, Jones J A. Magnetic field structure of interplanetary magnetic clouds at 1 AU. J Geophys Res, 1990, 95: 11957–11965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Farrugia C J, Osherovich V A, Burlaga L F. Magnetic flux rope versus the spheromak as models for interplanetary magnetic clouds. J Geophys Res, 1995, 100: 12293–12306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burlaga L F, Sittler E, Mariani F, et al. Magnetic loop behind an interplanetary shock: Voyager, Helios, and IMP 8 observations. J Geophys Res, 1981, 86: 6673–6684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bothmer V, Schwenn R. The structure and origin of magnetic clouds in the solar wind. Ann Geophys, 1998, 16: 1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Webb D F, Cliver EW, Crooker N U, et al. Relationship of halo coronal mass ejections, magnetic clouds, and magnetic storms. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105: 7491–7508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu D J, Chao J K, Lepping R P. Interaction between an interplanetary magnetic cloud and the Earth’s magnetosphere: Motions of the bow shock. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105: 12627–12638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu C C, Lepping R P, Gopalswamy N. Relationships among magnetic clouds, CMEs and geomagnetic storms. Sol Phys, 2006, 239: 449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Y, Hong M H, Chen G X, et al. Nightside field-aligned current during the April 6, 2000 superstorm. Chin Sci Bull, 2010, 55: 2175–2181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yuan C J, Zong Q G. Dynamic variations of the outer radiation belt during magnetic storms for 1.5–6.0 MeV electrons. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 431–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Y, Chen J Y, Feng X S. Predicting the shock arrival time using 1D-HD solar wind model. Chin Sci Bull, 2010, 55: 1053–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu S, Lu Q M, Cao Y, et al. The effects of the guide field on the structures of electron density depletions in collisionless magnetic reconnection. Chin Sci Bull, 2011, 56: 48–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cartwright M L, Moldwin M B. Comparison of small-scale flux rope magnetic properties to large-scale magnetic clouds: Evidence for reconnection across the HCS? J Geophys Res, 2008, 113: A09105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Feng H Q, Wu D J, Lin C C, et al. Interplanetary small- and intermediate-sized magnetic flux ropes during 1995–2005. J Geophys Res, 2008, 113: A12105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Feng H Q, Wu D J. Observations of a small interplanetary magnetic flux rope associated with a magnetic reconnection. Astrophys J, 2009, 705: 1385–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei F, Liu R, Fan Q, et al. Identification of the magnetic cloud boundary layers. J Geophys Res, 2003, 108: 1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gosling J T, Baker D N, Bame S G, et al. Bidirectional solar wind electron heat flux events. J Geophys Res, 1987, 92: 8519–8535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zwickl R D, Asbridge J R, Bame S J, et al. Plasma properties of driver gas following interplanetary shocks observed by ISWW-3, in Solar Wind Five. NASA Conf Publ, 1983, 2280: 711–717

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marsden R G, Sanderson T R, Tranquiller C, et al. ISEE-3 observations of low energy proton bidirectional events and their relation to isolated interplanetary magnetic structures. J Geophys Res, 1987, 92: 11009–11019

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gosling J T, Baker D N, Bame S J, et al. Bidirectional solar wind electron heat flux events. J Geophys Res, 1987, 92: 8519–8535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Burlaga L F, Skong R M, Smith C W, et al. Fast ejecta during the ascending phase of solar cycle 23: ACE observations, 1998–1999. J Geophys Res, 2001, 106: 20957–20978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin R P, Anderson K A, Ashford S, et al. A three-dimensional plasma and energetic particle investigation for the wind spacecraft. Space Sci Rev, 1995, 71: 125–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lepping R P, Acuna M H Burlaga L F, et al. The wind magnetic field investigation. Space Sci Rev, 1995, 71: 207–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Coleman P J. Wave-like phenomena in the interplanetary plasma: Mariner 2. Planet Space Sci, 1967, 15: 953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Coleman P J. Turbulence, viscosity, and dissipation in the solar wind plasma. Astrophys J, 1968, 153: 371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Belcher J W, Davis Jr L. Large-amplitude Alfvén waves in the interplanetary medium. J Geophys Res, 1971, 76: 3534–3563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Burlaga L F, Turner J M. Microscale ‘Alfvén waves’ in the solar wind at 1 AU. J Geophys Res, 1976, 81: 73–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gosling J T, Skoug R M, McComas D J, et al. Direct evidence for magnetic reconnection in the solar wind near 1 AU. J Geophys Res, 2005, 110: A01107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen Y, Li X, Song H Q, et al. Intrinsic instability of coronal ctreamers. Astrophys J, 2009, 191: 1936–1942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sheeley N R, Wang Y M, Hawley S H, et al. Measurements of flow speeds in the corona between 2 and 30 R ⊙. Astrophys J, 1997, 484: 472–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Song H Q, Kong X L, Chen Y, et al. A Statistical study on the morphology of rays and dynamics of blobs in the Wake of coronal mass ejections. Sol Phys, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11207-011-9848-9

  35. Song H Q, Chen Y, Liu K, et al. Quasi-periodic releases of streamer blobs and velocity variability of the slow solar wind near the Sun. Sol Phys, 2009, 258: 129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sterling A C, Hudson H S. YOHKOH SXT observations of X-ray “dimming” associated with a halo coronal mass ejection. Astrophys J, 1997, 491: L55–L58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ohyama M, Shibata K. X-ray plasma ejection associated with an impulsive flare on 1992 October 5: Physical conditions of X-ray plasma ejection. Astrophys J, 1998, 499: 934–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shibata K, Masuda S, Shimojo M, et al. Hot-plasma ejections associated with compact-loop solar flares. Astrophys J, 1995, 451: L83–L85

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Physics and Electronic Information, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang, 471022, China

    HengQiang Feng & JieMin Wang

  2. State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, Center for Space Science and Applied Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China

    HengQiang Feng

  3. Key Laboratory of Solar Activity, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China

    HengQiang Feng

  4. Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China

    DeJin Wu

Authors
  1. HengQiang Feng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. JieMin Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. DeJin Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to HengQiang Feng.

Additional information

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Rights and permissions

This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.

About this article

Cite this article

Feng, H., Wang, J. & Wu, D. The evidence for the evolution of interplanetary small flux ropes: Boundary layers. Chin. Sci. Bull. 57, 1415–1420 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4960-7

Download citation

  • Received: 06 September 2011

  • Accepted: 18 November 2011

  • Published: 19 February 2012

  • Issue Date: April 2012

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4960-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • interplanetary small flux ropes
  • boundary layer
  • magnetic reconnection exhaust
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

152.53.39.118

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature