Abstract
A flat submerged membrane combined with a TiO2/UV photocatalytic reactor (FSMPR) was employed in batch mode to remove humic acid (HA). HA removal efficiency was characterized by UV254 absorbance, UV-vis spectra, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration, specific UV absorbance (SUVA), and trihalomethane formation potential (THMFP). The FSMPR process was effective in removing more than 86% of DOC and nearly 100% of UV254 absorbance, while the THMFPs of samples were reduced to < 19 μg/L after 150 min of treatment. In addition, changes in transmembrane pressure (TMP) with and without UV were evaluated; TiO2/UV was effective at controlling membrane fouling by HA. Analysis of the molecular weight (MW) distributions and three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectra of HAs revealed that the effectiveness in membrane fouling control is a result of changes in HA molecular characteristics. The TiO2/UV photocatalytic reactor caused the degradation of high MW, hydrophobic humic-like molecules to low MW, hydrophilic protein-like molecules, although this fraction was not completely removed during 150 min of treatment and was less responsible for membrane fouling.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Gaffney J S, Marley N A, Clark S B. Humic and fulvic acids and organic colloidal materials in the environment. Acs Sym Ser, 1996, 651: 2–16
Jacangelo J G, Demarco J, Owen D M, et al. Selected processes for removing nom — an overview. J Am Water Works Ass, 1995, 87: 64–77
Vickers J C, Thompson M A, Kelkar U G. The use of membrane filtration in conjunction with coagulation processes for improved nom removal. Desalination, 1995, 102: 57–61
Huang X H, Leal M, Li Q L. Degradation of natural organic matter by TiO2 photocatalytic oxidation and its effect on fouling of low-pressure membranes. Water Res, 2008, 42: 1142–1150
Xi W M, Geissen S U. Separation of titanium dioxide from photocatalytically treated water by cross-flow microfiltration. Water Res, 2001, 35: 1256–1262
Fu J F, Ji M, Wang Z, et al. A new submerged membrane photocatalysis reactor (SMPR) for fulvic acid removal using a nanostructured photocatalyst. J Hazard Mater, 2006, 131: 238–242
Chin S S, Lim T M, Chiang K, et al. Hybrid low-pressure submerged membrane photoreactor for the removal of bisphenol A. Desalination, 2007, 202: 253–261
Chin S S, Lim T M, Chiang K, et al. Factors affecting the performance of a low-pressure submerged membrane photocatalytic reactor. Chem Eng J, 2007, 130: 53–63
Huang X, Meng Y, Liang P, et al. Operational conditions of a membrane filtration reactor coupled with photocatalytic oxidation. Sep Purif Technol, 2007, 55: 165–172
Choo K H, Chang D I, Park K W, et al. Use of an integrated photocatalysis/hollow fiber microfiltration system for the removal of trichloroethylene in water. J Hazard Mater, 2008, 152: 183–190
Huang H, Schwab K, Jacangelo J G. Pretreatment for low pressure membranes in water treatment: A review. Environ Sci Technol, 2009, 43: 3011–3019
Lee S A, Choo K H, Lee C H, et al. Use of ultrafiltration membranes for the separation of TiO2 photocatalysts in drinking water treatment. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2001, 40: 1712–1719
Choo K H, Tao R, Kim M J. Use of a photocatalytic membrane reactor for the removal of natural organic matter in water: Effect of photoinduced desorption and ferrihydrite adsorption. J Membrane Sci, 2008, 322: 368–374
Bai H, Zhang X, Pan J, et al. Combination of nano TiO2 photocatalytic oxidation with microfiltration (MF) for natural organic matter removal. Water Sci Technol: Water Supply, 2009, 9: 31–37
Xu S, Zhang X, Ng J, et al. Preparation and application of TiO2/Al2O3 microspherical photocatalyst for water treatment. Water Sci Technol: Water Supply, 2009, 9: 39–44
Zhang X, Pan J, Fu W, et al. TiO2 nanotube photocatalytic oxidation for water treatment. Water Sci Technol: Water Supply, 2009, 9: 45–49
Wiszniowski J, Robert D, Surmacz-Gorska J, et al. Photocatalytic decomposition of humic acids on TiO2 Part I: Discussion of adsorption and mechanism. J Photochem Photobiol A, 2002, 152: 267–273
Leenheer J A, Croue J P. Characterizing aquatic dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol, 2003, 37: 18a–26a
Drikas M, Chow C W K, Cook D. The impact of recalcitrant organic character on disinfection stability, trihalomethane formation and bacterial regrowth: An evaluation of magnetic ion exchange resin (MIEX (R)) and alum coagulation. J Water Supply Res T, 2003, 52: 475–487
Kim H C, Yu M J. Characterization of natural organic matter in conventional water treatment processes for selection of treatment processes focused on DBPs control. Water Res, 2005, 39: 4779–4789
Zhao Y, Taylor J, Hong S K. Combined influence of membrane surface properties and feed water qualities on RO/NF mass transfer, a pilot study. Water Res, 2005, 39: 1233–1244
Harrington G W, Bruchet A, Rybacki D, et al. Characterization of natural organic matter and its reactivity with chlorine. Water Disinfect Nat Org Matt, 1996, 649: 138–158
Liu S, Lim M, Fabris R, et al. TiO2 photocatalysis of natural organic matter in surface water: Impact on trihalomethane and haloacetic acid formation potential. Environ Sci Technol, 2008, 42: 6218–6223
Xiao Y T, Xu S S, Li Z H, et al. Progress of applied research on TiO2 photocatalysis-membrane separation coupling technology in water and wastewater treatments. Chinese Sci Bull, 2010, 55: 1345–1353
Belfort G, Davis R H, Zydney A L. The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in cross-flow microfiltration. J Membrane Sci, 1994, 96: 1–58
Ho C C, Zydney A L. A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration. J Colloid Interf Sci, 2000, 232: 389–399
Li H, Fane A G, Coster H G L, et al. Direct observation of particle deposition on the membrane surface during crossflow microfiltration. J Membrane Sci, 1998, 149: 83–97
Kim J S, Lee C H, Chang I S. Effect of pump smear on the performance of a crossflow membrane bioreactor. Water Res, 2001, 35: 2137–2144
Zhang X W, Pan J H, Du A J, et al. Combination of one-dimensional TiO2 nanowire photocatalytic oxidation with microfiltration for water treatment. Water Res, 2009, 43: 1179–1186
Yuan W, Zydney A L. Humic acid fouling during microfiltration. J Membrane Sci, 1999, 157: 1–12
Howe K J, Clark M M. Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters. Environ Sci Technol, 2002, 36: 3571–3576
Kimura K, Hane Y, Watanabe Y, et al. Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. Water Res, 2004, 38: 3431–3441
Coble P G, Del Castillo C E, Avril B. Distribution and optical properties of CDOM in the Arabian Sea during the 1995 Southwest Monsoon. Deep-Sea Res Part II, 1998, 45: 2195–2223
Stedmon C A, Markager S. Resolving the variability in dissolved organic matter fluorescence in a temperate estuary and its catchment using PARAFAC analysis. Limnol Oceanogr, 2005, 50: 686–697
Stedmon C A, Markager S. Tracing the production and degradation of autochthonous fractions of dissolved organic matter by fluorescence analysis. Limnol Oceanogr, 2005, 50: 1415–1426
Mayer L M, Schick L L, Loder T C. Dissolved protein fluorescence in two maine estuaries. Mar Chem, 1999, 64: 171–179
Baker A, Inverarity R. Protein-like fluorescence intensity as a possible tool for determining river water quality. Hydrol Process, 2004, 18: 2927–2945
Chen J, Gu B H, Leboeuf E J, et al. Spectroscopic characterization of the structural and functional properties of natural organic matter fractions. Chemosphere, 2002, 48: 59–68
Coble P G. Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation emission matrix spectroscopy. Mar Chem, 1996, 51: 325–346
Swietlik J, Dabrowska A, Raczyk-Stanislawiak U, et al. Reactivity of natural organic matter fractions with chlorine dioxide and ozone. Water Res, 2004, 38: 547–558
Korshin G V, Kumke M U, Li C W, et al. Influence of chlorination on chromophores and fluorophores in humic substances. Environ Sci Technol, 1999, 33: 1207–1212
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, Y., Chu, H., Dong, B. et al. Evaluation of humic acid removal by a flat submerged membrane photoreactor. Chin. Sci. Bull. 56, 3437–3444 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4712-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4712-8