Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Chinese Science Bulletin
  3. Article

Uncertainties in assessing the effect of climate change on agriculture using model simulation and uncertainty processing methods

  • Review
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 March 2011
  • Volume 56, pages 729–737, (2011)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Chinese Science Bulletin
Uncertainties in assessing the effect of climate change on agriculture using model simulation and uncertainty processing methods
Download PDF
  • FengMei Yao1,
  • PengCheng Qin1,
  • JiaHua Zhang2,3,4,
  • ErDa Lin5 &
  • …
  • Vijendra Boken6 
  • 2384 Accesses

  • 45 Citations

  • 6 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Model simulation is an important way to study the effects of climate change on agriculture. Such assessment is subject to a range of uncertainties because of either incomplete knowledge or model technical uncertainties, impeding effective decision-making to climate change. On the basis of uncertainties in the impact assessment at different levels, this article systematically summarizes the sources and propagation of uncertainty in the assessment of the effect of climate change on agriculture in terms of the climate projection, the assessment process, and the crop models linking to climate models. Meanwhile, techniques and methods focusing on different levels and sources of uncertainty and uncertainty propagation are introduced, and shortcomings and insufficiencies in uncertainty processing are pointed out. Finally, in terms of how to accurately assess the effect of climate change on agriculture, improvements to further decrease potential uncertainty are suggested.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Pathways to identify and reduce uncertainties in agricultural climate impact assessments

Article 15 July 2024

Uncertainties in assessing climate change impacts and adaptation options with wheat crop models

Article 16 May 2022

Impact of climate change on crop yield and role of model for achieving food security

Article 14 July 2016

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Climate-Change Impacts
  • Computer Modelling
  • Model Building and Simulation
  • Numerical Simulation
  • Climate and Earth System Modelling
  • Probabilistic Methods, Simulation and Stochastic Differential Equations
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. Wang S W. The global warming debate. Chinese Sci Bull, 2010, 55: 1961–1962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ge Q S, Wang S W, Fang X Q. An uncertainty analysis of understanding on climate change (in Chinese). Geogr Res, 2010, 29: 191–203

    Google Scholar 

  3. Parry M, Rosenzweig C, Iglesias A, et al. Climate change and world food security: A new assessment. Glob Environ Change, 1999, 9(Suppl 1): S51–S67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yao F M, Xu Y L, Lin E D, et al. Assessing the impacts of climate change on rice yields in the main rice areas of China. Clim Change, 2007, 80: 395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tubiello F N, Soussana J F, Howden S M. Crop and pasture response to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104: 19686–19690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. IPCC. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability—Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yin C H, Yan X D, Shi Z G, et al. Simulation of the climatic effects of natural forcings during the pre-industrial era. Chinese Sci Bull, 2007, 52: 1545–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Murphy J M, Sexton D M H, Barnett D N, et al. Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature, 2004, 430: 768–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dubrovsky M, Zalud Z, Stastna M. Sensitivity of ceres-maize yields to statistical structure of daily weather series. Clim Change, 2000, 46: 447–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Challinor A J, Wheeler T R, Slingo J M, et al. Quantification of physical and biological uncertainty in the simulation of the yield of a tropical crop using present-day and doubled CO2 climates. Phil Trans R Soc B, 2005, 360: 2085–2094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Walker W E, Harremoës P, Rotmans J, et al. Defining uncertainty: A conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integr Assess, 2004, 4: 5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen P Q, Cheng B B, Wang F, et al. Discrimination on several key Issues of global climate change (in Chinese). Adv Earth Sci, 2010, 25: 69–75

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yin Y Y, Wang G X. Climate Change Impact Assessment: Methods and Applications (in Chinese). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2004. 1–311

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lin E D, Liu Y J. Advance in new scenarios of greenhouse gas emission and climate change (in Chinese). Sci Agr Sin, 2008, 41: 1700–1707

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang X Q, Peng L L, Lin Z H. Progress on the projections of future climate change with various emission scenarios (in Chinese). Adv Earth Sci, 2008, 23: 174–185

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moss R H, Edmonds J A, Hibbard K A, et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature, 2010, 463: 747–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo Y. Uncertainty in the science of climate change and futuristic priority research directions (in Chinese). Recent Develop World Seismol, 1997, 17: 2–6

    Google Scholar 

  18. Qin D H, Chen Z L, Luo Y, et al. Updated understanding of climate change sciences (in Chinese). Adv Clim Change Res, 2007, 3: 63–73

    Google Scholar 

  19. Du J. Present situation and prospects of ensemble numerical prediction (in Chinese). Quart J Appl Meteorl, 2002, 13: 16–28

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sun N. Application of crop growth modeling in assessing climate change impact on crop productivity (in Chinese). Earth Sci Front, 2002, 9: 232

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lin E D, Xiong W, Ju H, et al. Climate change impacts on crop yield and quality with CO2 fertilization in China. Phil Trans R Soc B, 2005, 360: 2149–2154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Long S P, Ainsworth E A, Leakey A D B, et al. Food for thought: Lower-than-expected crop yield stimulation with rising CO2 concentrations. Science, 2006, 312: 1918–1921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tubiello F N, Amthor J S, Boote K J, et al. Crop response to elevated CO2 and world food supply: A comment on “Food for Thought…” by Long et al. Science 312:1918–1921, 2006. Eur J Agron, 2007, 26: 215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leakey A D B, Ainsworth E A, Bernacchi C J, et al. Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: Six important lessons from FACE. J Exp Bot, 2009, 60: 2859–2876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang T, Zhu J, Yang X. Non-stationary thermal time accumulation reduces the predictability of climate change effects on agriculture. Agric For Meteorol, 2008, 148: 1412–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Todorovic M, Albrizio R, Zivotic L, et al. Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST Models in the simulation of sunflower growth under different water regimes. Agron J, 2009, 101: 509–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aggarwal P K, Mall R K. Climate change and rice yields in diverse agro-environments of India. II. Effect of uncertainties in scenarios and crop models on impact assessment. Clim Change, 2002, 52: 331–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bachelet D, Gay C A. The impacts of climate change on rice yield—comparison of 4 model performances. Ecol Model, 1993, 65: 71–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Challinor A J, Wheeler T R. Crop yield reduction in the tropics under climate change: Processes and uncertainties. Agric For Meteorol, 2008, 148: 343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ewert F, Rodriguez D, Jamieson P, et al. Effects of elevated CO2 and drought on wheat: Testing crop simulation models for different experimental and climatic conditions. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2002, 93: 249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Matthews R, Wassmann R. Modelling the impacts of climate change and methane emission reductions on rice production: A review. Eur J Agron, 2003, 19: 573–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mearns L O, Mavromatis T, Tsvetsinskaya E, et al. Comparative responses of EPIC and CERES crop models to high and low spatial resolution climate change scenarios. J Geophys Res Atmos, 1999, 104: 6623–6646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cipra B. Revealing uncertainties in computer models. Science, 2000, 287: 960–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sadras V O, Calviño P A, Quantification of grain yield response to soil depth in soybean, maize, sunflower, and wheat. Agron J, 2001: 577–583

  35. Wang J, Wang E L, Luo Q Y, et al. Modelling the sensitivity of wheat growth and water balance to climate change in Southeast Australia. Clim Change, 2009, 96: 79–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Easterling W E, Chen X F, Hays C, et al. Improving the validation of model-simulated crop yield response to climate change: An application to the EPIC model. Clim Res, 1996,: 263–273

  37. Carbone G J, Mearns L O, Mavromatis T, et al. Evaluating CROPGRO-Soybean performance for use in climate impact studies. Agron J, 2003, 95: 537–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lenz-Wiedemann V I S, Klar C W, Schneider K. Development and test of a crop growth model for application within a global change decision support system. Ecol Model, 2010, 221: 314–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Weiss A, Wilhelm W. The circuitous path to the comparison of simulated values from crop models with field observations. J Agric Sci, 2006, 144: 475–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gregory P J, Johnson S N, Newton A C, et al. Integrating pests and pathogens into the climate change/food security debate. J Exp Bot, 2009, 60: 2827–2838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. White J W, Boote K J, Hoogenboom G, et al. Regression-based evaluation of ecophysiological models. Agron J, 2007, 99: 419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lobell D B, Asner G P. Climate and management contributions to recent trends in US agricultural yields. Science, 2003, 299: 1032–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang Y, Fang X Q, Xu T. A method for calculating the climatic yield of grain under climate change (in Chinese). J Nat Resour, 2004, 19: 531–536

    Google Scholar 

  44. Aggarwal P K. Uncertainties in crop, soil and weather inputs used in growth-models—Implications for simulated outputs and their applications. Agric Sys, 1995, 48: 361–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Niu X, Easterling W, Hays C J, et al. Reliability and input-data induced uncertainty of the EPIC model to estimate climate change impact on sorghum yields in the U.S. Great Plains. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2009, 129: 268–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Baron C, Sultan B, Balme M, et al. From GCM grid cell to agricultural plot: Scale issues affecting modelling of climate impact. Phil Trans R Soc B, 2005, 360: 2095–2108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Xiong W, Yang J. Advances in linking crop models with climate models (in Chinese). Chin J Eco-Agric, 2008, 16: 249–252

    Google Scholar 

  48. Challinor A J, Ewert F, Arnold S, et al. Crops and climate change: Progress, trends, and challenges in simulating impacts and informing adaptation. J Exp Bot, 2009, 60: 2775–2789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bakker M M, Govers G, Ewert F, et al. Variability in regional wheat yields as a function of climate, soil and economic variables: Assessing the risk of confounding. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2005, 110: 195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Challinor A J, Osborne T, Morse A, et al. Methods and resources for climate impacts research: Achieving synergy. Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 2009, 90: 836–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Challinor A J, Wheeler T R, Craufurd P Q, et al. Design and optimisation of a large-area process-based model for annual crops. Agric For Meteorol, 2004, 124: 99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Osborne T M, Lawrence D M, Challinor A J, et al. Development and assessment of a coupled crop-climate model. Glob Change Biol, 2007, 13: 169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tao F, Yokozawa M, Zhang Z. Modelling the impacts of weather and climate variability on crop productivity over a large area: A new process-based model development, optimization, and uncertainties analysis. Agric For Meteorol, 2009, 149: 831–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Iizumi T, Yokozawa M, Nishimori M. Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis of a large-scale crop model for paddy rice: Application of a Bayesian approach. Agric For Meteorol, 2009, 149: 333–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Masutomi Y, Takahashi K, Harasawa H, et al. Impact assessment of climate change on rice production in Asia in comprehensive consideration of process/parameter uncertainty in general circulation models. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2009, 131: 281–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Reidsma P, Ewert F, Boogaard H, et al. Regional crop modelling in Europe: The impact of climatic conditions and farm characteristics on maize yields. Agric Sys, 2009, 100: 51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Challinor A J, Wheeler T R. Use of a crop model ensemble to quantify CO2 stimulation of water-stressed and well-watered crops. Agric For Meteorol, 2008, 148: 1062–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Shlyakhter A, James L, Valverde A, et al. Integrated risk analysis of global climate change. Chemosphere, 1995, 30: 1585–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. New M, Hulme M. Representing uncertainty in climate change scenarios: A Monte-carlo approach. Integr Assess, 2000, 1: 203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Tebaldi C, Lobell D B. Towards probabilistic projections of climate change impacts on global crop yields. Geophys Res Lett, 2008, 35: L08705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lobell D B, Burke M B. Why are agricultural impacts of climate change so uncertain? The importance of temperature relative to precipitation. Environ Res Lett, 2008, 3: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhao Z C. Lastest advances in global climate projections (in Chinese). Adv Clim Change Res, 2006, 2: 68–70, 97

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cui S H, Li F Y, Huang J, et al. Review of sensitivity research on the context of global change (in Chinese). Adv Earth Sci, 2009, 24: 1033–1041

    Google Scholar 

  64. Jones R N. Analysing the risk of climate change using an irrigation demand model. Clim Res, 2000, 14: 89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Dessai S, Hulme M. Assessing the robustness of adaptation decisions to climate change uncertainties: A case study on water resources management in the East of England. Glob Environ Change, 2007, 17: 59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Katz R W. Techniques for estimating uncertainty in climate change scenarios and impact studies. Clim Res, 2002, 20: 167–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Makowski D, Naud C, Jeuffroy M H, et al. Global sensitivity analysis for calculating the contribution of genetic parameters to the variance of crop model prediction. Reliab Eng Syst Safe, 2006, 91: 1142–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Wu J, Yu F S, Chen Z X, et al. Global sensitivity analysis of growth simulation parameters of winter wheat based on EPIC model(in Chinese). Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2008, 25: 136–142

    Google Scholar 

  69. Lamboni M, Makowski D, Lehuger S, et al. Multivariate global sensitivity analysis for dynamic crop models. Field Crops Res, 2009, 113: 312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Refsgaard J C, van der Sluijs J P, Brown J, et al. A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error. Adv Water Res, 2006, 29: 1586–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Peng S B, Huang J L, Sheehy J E, et al. Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101: 9971–9975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Sheehy J E, Mitchell P L, Ferrer A B. Decline in rice grain yields with temperature: Models and correlations can give different estimates. Field Crops Res, 2006, 98: 151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Lobell D B, Ortiz-Monasterio J I. Impacts of day versus night temperatures on spring wheat yields: A comparison of empirical and CERES model predictions in three locations. Agron J, 2007, 99: 469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Collins M. Ensembles and probabilities: A new era in the prediction of climate change. Phil Trans R Soc A, 2007, 365: 1957–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Lobell D B, Burke M B, Tebaldi C, et al. Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science, 2008, 319: 607–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Tao F L, Zhang Z, Liu J Y, et al. Modelling the impacts of weather and climate variability on crop productivity over a large area: A new super-ensemble-based probabilistic projection. Agric For Meteorol, 2009, 149: 1266–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Challinor A J, Wheeler T, Hemming D, et al. Ensemble yield simulations: crop and climate uncertainties, sensitivity to temperature and genotypic adaptation to climate change. Clim Res, 2009, 38: 117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Naylor R L, Battisti D S, Vimont D J, et al. Assessing risks of climate variability and climate change for Indonesian rice agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104: 7752–7757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. New M, Lopez A, Dessai S, et al. Challenges in using probabilistic climate change information for impact assessments: An example from the water sector. Phil Trans R Soc A, 2007, 365: 2117–2131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Jones R N. An environmental risk assessment/management framework for climate change impact assessments. Nat Hazards, 2001, 23: 197–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Luo Q Y, Bellotti W, Williams M, et al. Risk analysis of possible impacts of climate change on South Australian wheat production. Clim Change, 2007, 85: 89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Hanson J W, Jones J W. Scaling-up crop models for climate variability application. Agric Sys, 2000, 65: 43–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Mavromatis T, Boote K J, Jones J W, et al. Developing genetic coefficients from crop simulation models using data from crop performance trials. Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Challinor A J, Wheeler T R, Slingo J M, et al. Design and optimisation of a large-area process-based model for annual crops. Agric For Meteorol, 2004, 24: 199–120

    Google Scholar 

  85. de Wit A J W, van Diepen C A. Crop model data assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman filter for improving regional crop yield forecasts. Agric For Meteorol, 2007, 146: 38–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Ines A V M, Hansen J W. Bias correction of daily GCM rainfall for crop simulation studies. Agric For Meteorol, 2006, 138: 44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Baigorria G A, Jones J W, O’Brien J J. Potential predictability of crop yield using an ensemble climate forecast by a regional circulation model. Agric For Meteorol, 2008, 148: 1353–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Beven K. Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment. Proc R Soc A, 2002, 458: 2465–2484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Mo X, Beven K. Multi-objective parameter conditioning of a three-source wheat canopy model. Agric For Meteorol, 2004, 122: 39–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Blasone R-S, Vrugt J A, Madsen H, et al. Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. Adv Water Res, 2008, 31: 630–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. He J Q, Jones J W, Graham W D, et al. Influence of likelihood function choice for estimating crop model parameters using the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method. Agric Sys, 2010, 103: 256–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Zhang J H, Yao F M, Zheng L Y, et al. Evaluation of grassland dynamics in the Northern Tibetan Plateau of China using remote sensing and climate data. Sensor, 2007, 7: 3312–3328

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Earth Science, Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    FengMei Yao & PengCheng Qin

  2. Center for Earth Observation and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100094, China

    JiaHua Zhang

  3. Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China

    JiaHua Zhang

  4. School of Geoscience, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, 434025, China

    JiaHua Zhang

  5. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China

    ErDa Lin

  6. Department of Geography and Earth Science, University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, NE, 68849, USA

    Vijendra Boken

Authors
  1. FengMei Yao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. PengCheng Qin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. JiaHua Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. ErDa Lin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vijendra Boken
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JiaHua Zhang.

Additional information

This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Rights and permissions

This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.

About this article

Cite this article

Yao, F., Qin, P., Zhang, J. et al. Uncertainties in assessing the effect of climate change on agriculture using model simulation and uncertainty processing methods. Chin. Sci. Bull. 56, 729–737 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4374-6

Download citation

  • Received: 13 November 2010

  • Accepted: 20 December 2010

  • Published: 17 March 2011

  • Issue Date: March 2011

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4374-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • climate change
  • agriculture
  • impact assessment
  • uncertainty
  • model simulation
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

152.53.39.118

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature